13:00:20 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 13:00:20 Meeting started Mon Sep 26 13:00:20 2011 UTC. The chair is Sparks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:23 #meetingname Fedora Docs 13:00:23 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 13:00:28 #topic Roll Call 13:00:33 * Sparks 13:00:37 * jjmcd 13:00:46 hi, I'm here 13:00:54 * suehle . 13:03:03 * fnadge too 13:03:15 * jhradilek is here 13:04:52 Okay, lets get started. 13:05:06 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 13:05:47 jjmcd: Send Project Wide-Final Release Notes Deadline 13:05:59 nope 13:06:17 #action jjmcd to send Project Wide-Final Release Notes Deadlines 13:06:36 #action zoglesby to send reminder to Trans that Final Guides POT files are coming 13:06:49 #topic F16 Schedule 13:06:57 #link http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-docs-tree-tasks.html 13:07:25 F16 release slipped by two weeks which means we have that much more time to get the guides squared away. 13:07:41 Still no RN POTs to tx 13:07:45 i changed the name for the fedora docs release set from f15 to just fedora documentation, so that's solved now 13:07:56 pkovar: +1 13:08:01 jjmcd: ? 13:08:04 All ready to go and still can't push 13:08:09 Why not? 13:08:12 the pots for the user guide are on tx as well 13:08:19 I was going to ask someone else to push 13:08:25 but it might not be that simple 13:08:43 Why can't you push the pots? 13:08:47 Release notes don't have all the same pieces release to release 13:08:54 Right... 13:08:58 Some sort of credentials thing 13:09:05 With no clue why 13:09:20 my .txconfig looks exactly like nathant says it should 13:09:26 Okay. Let's meet up in #transifex after the meeting and see if we can get it all straightened out. 13:09:29 jmcd: did you follow our wiki docs? 13:09:38 pkovar, yup 13:10:00 #info jjmcd is having problems with Transifex and is unable to push Release Notes POT files. 13:10:02 will be in #transifex as well after the meeting 13:10:13 Okay, anything else regarding the F16 release? 13:10:37 yes 13:10:47 go 13:10:49 I notice folks are translating the f15 docs 13:11:04 I assume they think they are f16 13:11:24 jjmcd: which guides do you mean? 13:11:31 Release notes 13:11:34 Well, with the exception of the RN, the F16 docs are the F15 docs with a few additions so we should be able to use the F15 for F16 13:11:51 Yeah, but not the RN which are totally new 13:11:55 Yeah, the RNs need to be removed from Transifex at some point. 13:12:05 Or have releases noted 13:12:06 but when do we draw the line? 13:12:17 In the old tx there were releases 13:12:23 jjmcd: for now, you could post an announcement on the rn project page 13:12:28 * Sparks could see branching the RNs in Transifex 13:13:02 i was thinking about several branches in tx too, but don't know the exact procedure to do that yet 13:13:16 Perhaps a F16 Release Notes project 13:13:31 For RN's there is almost nothing that carries over 13:13:33 though i asked on #tx last week, but got no answer 13:13:38 Just the license nonsense 13:14:19 jjmcd: or you can just delete the resources for now from the rn project 13:14:30 so that the project is empty 13:14:36 for the time being 13:14:45 Yeah, prolly should do a pull into f15 first just to keep that work 13:15:51 jjmcd: shall i delete the resources for you if you have problems with credentials? 13:16:02 Let me do a pull first 13:16:10 jjmcd: ok 13:16:32 Okay, anything else on the F16 release? 13:16:35 If we can't resolve online quickly perhaps you could also push f16 13:16:48 Should be good to go except for the tx push 13:17:05 Okay, lets move on... 13:17:10 #topic FUDcon Blacksburg 13:17:18 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Blacksburg_2012 13:17:43 Docs is planning on holding a couple of classes at FUDCon Blacksburg in January. 13:17:48 #info Docs is planning on holding a couple of classes at FUDCon Blacksburg in January. 13:18:21 #info The first class will be an introduction to Fedora Docs and the second will be an introduction to DocBook XML and Publican. 13:18:36 If anyone would like to help with either of these classes please let me know. 13:18:52 If there's something useful I can do, I'd help with that. 13:19:02 jsmith is heading up the DocBook XML / Publican class and I believe jjmcd is helping him with that. 13:19:11 I'm also working on bringing more of the Brand team with me to Blacksburg, so that might be a neat way to get them involved. 13:19:16 I'm heading up the introduction class and definitely need some help with that. 13:19:17 No, I am doing Milan with jhradilek 13:19:33 jjmcd: You aren't coming to Blacksburg? 13:19:35 Someone else is helping at Blacksburg, don't recall who 13:19:37 suehle: Awesome! 13:19:38 YEs I am 13:19:57 jjmcd: So I hear that you will be helping jsmith with the class... :) 13:20:19 jsmith indicated he would help out jhradilek and me at Milan 13:20:27 Okay 13:20:36 I had no plans for Blacksburg, but no issue with helping, either 13:20:47 Seemed like someone else was onboard there, tho 13:21:00 suehle: We having branding that goes into Publican so it might be good to get them involved. :) 13:21:39 * Sparks should probably create a wiki page for planning those classes 13:22:15 (the Red Hat brand team if that wasn't clear to people who don't know me) 13:22:36 suehle: You aren't bringing your personal branding team? 13:23:19 I was considering that maybe not everybody in the world knows where I work. :) 13:23:20 * Sparks notes suehle also has her own theme music 13:23:29 :) 13:23:32 But I'll work on getting a personal branding team. They can start with my shoe wardrobe. 13:24:00 It's still a bit early for FUDCon Blacksburg but it will be here before you know it. 13:24:05 Anything else? 13:24:53 #topic Docs QA 13:25:01 Okay, I have failed big time on this... 13:25:25 #action Sparks to send a message to the Docs list discussing the QA discussion at OLF. 13:25:55 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2011-September/013736.html 13:26:55 We discussed this at the Docs FAD at OLF earlier this month and came up with a reasonably shaky gameplan. It definitely needs work and I think I'm going to have to work on getting folks involved. 13:27:21 Anyone have anything they want to discuss on this topic? 13:27:40 jhradilek ? :-) 13:28:24 Well, I expressed my concerns in #fedora-docs two weeks ago. And I am still going to send a reply to the mailing list. 13:28:42 jhradilek: If it didn't happen on the list then it didn't happen. 13:28:57 Sparks: Yep, I know. :-) 13:29:34 I believe everyone agrees we need a QA team to review our guides... 13:29:45 Definitely. 13:29:56 I don't think everyone knows the goals, though, and are looking too hard at the tools in which to implement the process. 13:30:19 So perhaps we should rework this entire thing and start with getting the goals lined up, then the process, then the tools. 13:30:30 Agreed. 13:30:43 agreed 13:30:55 excellent idea 13:30:56 And personally, I think we already have all the tools we need. Well, except a build server perhaps. 13:31:08 A build server? 13:31:20 a staging server? 13:31:28 That's what I meant. 13:31:38 Doing it manually is still a bit cumbersome. 13:31:59 #action Sparks to work on the Docs QA wiki page to start with goals, then process, then tools. 13:32:21 jhradilek: You have your very own staging server right in front of you. Build the source and review it. 13:32:42 Sparks: That's not exactly what I meant. 13:33:08 Sparks: I was thinking about publishing drafts, because for me, that is a thing we are missing at the moment. 13:33:45 jhradilek: We can publish drafts now. We do it at docs.fp.o under Draft Documentation 13:33:54 And even though people publish drafts from time to time, they are still way behind the development version. 13:34:26 Sparks: right, we only have the draft section, that is. i can see some documentation is already published under f16 though 13:34:50 so the process, if any, is not followed with every docs 13:34:53 pkovar: Yep, I published the Security Guide under F16 because nothing changed. 13:35:07 Sparks: Yeah, but to do it, you need to: pull the docs.fedoraproject.org repo, manually build the book, install it, commit the changes and wait. 13:35:09 We really don't have a process. 13:35:18 Sparks: aha, that makes sense, thanks for the clarification 13:35:24 jhradilek: Okay... 13:36:02 jhradilek: that's exactly why i think that translators won't be able to do publish the books themselves 13:36:10 Sparks: ^ 13:36:23 it's too complicated right now 13:36:31 pkovar: Why not? I don't have any super powers. 13:37:17 Sparks: yet you need to care aonly about docs 13:37:33 image that transl guys have a lot more work 13:37:49 many more tools that they need to learn and use 13:37:56 how so? 13:38:14 It is only five steps to publish a guide to the web 13:38:22 anyhow, why not just tell them use only git for the fedora docs 13:38:39 because transifex is then quite redundant 13:38:43 pkovar: We generally only use git. The RH folks in Brisbane are the problems. 13:39:13 If the translators don't need transifex... why are they using it? 13:39:36 They already have access to the repositories... they can pull the pot files directly now. 13:39:38 Sparks: they need it to translate fedora software 13:39:51 I'm talking about Docs 13:40:00 Sparks: i believe that's the case for some of them only 13:40:26 ALL of our repositories can be read without permissions. 13:40:39 If you are talking about commit access then all they have to do is ask. 13:40:45 for now, they don't need to deal with git at all, and thats a big advantage 13:40:48 I have no problem giving translators commit access. 13:41:06 so what's the problem? We are already pushing things to Transifex 13:42:00 * Sparks is confused 13:42:13 yep, so why not finish the whole process with the last step, that is publishing 13:42:29 if is it a big deal for guide owners 13:42:40 then it will be for translators too 13:42:49 Not exactly, it doesn't scale the same way. 13:43:20 Because the guide owner has to do each language individually. So forty languages takes a while. 13:43:22 Just as a side note: It is not a problem for me personally, but I agree with Petr that it is unnecessarily complicated at the moment. 13:43:37 jhradilek: It's five steps. 13:43:48 hrmm, let's think about it like it was sofware release and we would be telling translators to roll tarballs for us 13:43:53 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Publishing_a_document_with_Publican#Publishing_a_document 13:44:02 Sparks: And 6.9GB transferred over a network. ;-) 13:44:10 jhradilek: Just the first time 13:44:18 pkovar: This isn't software. 13:44:23 Sparks: well, but it's about running one butch command 13:44:29 pkovar: The translators are literally creating a new guide. 13:44:33 batch, i mean :-) 13:44:34 Sparks: Still a requirement to publish a book. 13:44:59 jhradilek: There isn't anything special about my computer... 13:45:14 Huh? 13:45:19 This has gotten way off topic... 13:45:28 :-) 13:45:33 okey :-) 13:45:57 We discussed this at the FAD. No one there showed any concerns and no one called in to voice any concerns. 13:46:34 Sparks: unfortunately, i wasn't there 13:46:38 Having translators publish their own work solves so many problems and reduces the work load on the docs writer. 13:46:42 pkovar: You could have called in. 13:47:20 Okay, anything else on the QA topic? 13:47:26 right, but i know from working with translator communities that this process draft has some problems that i am concerned about 13:47:37 that's it,anyway :-) 13:47:54 #topic Guide Status 13:48:22 #info Security Guide has been published for F16. No major changes since F14 version. Some chapters were rearranged. 13:48:32 Anyone have any updates for their guide(2)? 13:50:03 the brach for the user guide has been created 13:50:21 i mean the f16 branch 13:50:41 Has the UG been updated for GNOME 3? 13:51:04 fnadge: ? 13:51:56 fnadge told me that the kde chapter still needs some work 13:52:03 note sure about xfce 13:52:29 pkovar: Okay, since we have a couple more weeks before the release perhaps more work could be done before branching. 13:53:14 Sparks: people can always work on master and then merge back with the f16 branch, no problem 13:53:37 pkovar: Right. 13:53:47 Anything else? 13:54:19 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 13:54:33 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 13:54:56 * Sparks opens the link to determine how many outstanding bugs we have open. 13:55:47 Okay, network is being slow today. 13:56:08 Please review the open bugs for any guides you are working on and close what you can. 13:56:16 i'll close the oprofile bug against dg soon 13:56:17 #info 149 open bugs 13:56:25 have been working on it 13:56:29 :) 13:56:30 Okay 13:56:40 #topic Open floor discussion 13:56:53 Anyone have anything they want to talk about in the four minutes we have left? 13:58:11 Sparks: so until we agree with trans guys on a new process.. 13:58:31 i guess we are all supposed to follow the old procedure, right? 13:58:40 pkovar: What procedure? 13:58:41 with publishing and such 13:59:09 I don't think we have a procedure in place 13:59:27 because translators count with that, i mean that we will publish the docs for them 13:59:44 There isn't anything that says what you have to do with your work. We have procedures that allow you to do things, like publish and package. 13:59:46 for this release,at least 14:00:25 so what is our message to translators then? for this upcoming release 14:00:38 diy? 14:01:01 I don't know. 14:01:20 And that's an hour. 14:01:22 we should know, the release is approaching :-) 14:01:34 We can continue this conversation over in #fedora-docs and on the list. 14:01:41 Thanks, everyone, for coming out. 14:01:47 #endmeeting