13:17:54 #startmeeting famsco 11-11-12 13:17:54 Meeting started Sat Nov 12 13:17:54 2011 UTC. The chair is yn1v. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:17:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:18:12 #topic roll call 13:18:19 .fas yn1v 13:18:20 yn1v: yn1v 'Neville A. Cross' 13:18:20 .fas igorps 13:18:23 igorps: igor 'Igor Pires Soares' 13:18:41 .fas gbraad 13:18:42 gbraad-china: gbraad 'Gerard Braad (吉拉德)' 13:19:11 shall we go along the agenda? 13:19:30 .fasinfo kaio 13:19:31 kaio: User: kaio, Name: Caius Chance (かいお), email: me@kaio.net, Creation: 2008-09-10, IRC Nick: kaio, Timezone: Australia/Brisbane, Locale: en, Extension: 5114286, GPG key ID: 17BEFCFA, Status: active 13:19:35 kaio: Unapproved Groups: art 13:19:39 kaio: Approved Groups: cla_fedora cla_done fedorabugs hgflies packager cla_redhat ambassadors l10n-commits @packager-zh famsco cvsl10n freemedia 13:20:04 (as .fas kaio has many me came up~ 13:20:46 #agenda following agenda 13:20:51 gbraad, what's the status in the proposal for subdomain fc.o ? 13:21:13 kaio is the one answering this. at the moment still technical deatils 13:21:36 however, I was approached by a community member about the status of another domain 13:21:46 I saw a new request for domain in the mailing list 13:21:46 is it at least moving forward? 13:22:09 followed up, no responses yet, pinging infra after meeting 13:22:11 gbraad-china, another domain for China? 13:22:14 pls move forward 13:22:43 3 subdomains are pending, need to kick off w/ infra 13:22:56 #action kaio to ping infra about subdomain fc.o 13:23:02 ++ 13:24:00 igorps: not really. more an inquiry why the domain exists and who owns it. 13:24:05 next item is for igorps about liaisons, we saw it last meeting and we made suggestions. 13:24:20 igorps: I am also slightly confused, but I know many domain names exists in the Chinese community. 13:24:31 igorps: curious also about the legal status of these 13:25:07 gbraad-china, is that something we should worry about? 13:25:55 we need to make sure they follow the trademark guidelines 13:26:16 yn1v, you can skip that topic 13:26:42 I'll only finish that page after closing this month report 13:27:17 as practical approach what fedora would like is to have some prominent link to the fp.o web site and the ability to take over in case of problems like misconduct, abandon or hacked 13:27:26 the subdomains from fedoracommunity.org is just for directing visitors from fc.o to chinese community 13:28:11 just as the other domains currently chinese group have 13:28:35 we are discussing about pointing them to fedora wiki 13:28:57 (the "zh" directory page on fp wiki) 13:29:02 #info igorps will close monthly report 13:29:23 the question is: can we have more than one domain per county in fedoracommunity.org? 13:29:39 igorps, I guess not. 13:30:03 igorps, as per the ans I received from jsmith the other day 13:30:18 I guess we can, but I can not think in which scenario that will be useful 13:30:28 as alias may be yes 13:30:52 it looks like not, indeed. So you guys need to take care to choose the more appropriated one 13:30:59 anyth smaller than country-wise may be too micro-mgmt 13:31:13 +1 13:31:40 against unity also 13:31:41 IMHO it's good to have only one per country, so we avoid fragmentation 13:32:34 igorps: +1 13:32:43 there is flexibility anyways 13:33:01 no need to make that so rigid 13:33:07 kaio: micromgmt and politics... hk? 13:33:16 gbraad, s/hk/tw. 13:33:17 * gbraad-china just wonders... 13:33:40 * gbraad-china didn't dare to go there even 13:33:55 I meant to say, HK is considered to be part of the CN domain. 13:34:05 gbraad-china, for shopping you can. :P 13:34:13 but how about the linguistic aspect, traditional Chinese 13:34:25 gbraad-china, the conclusion at the moment is: 13:34:51 hk might lead to micromanagement, but can aid in selection of targeted news 13:35:05 cn.fc.o for China, zh.fc.o as CNAME of cn.fc.o, zht for anywhere using Chinese (Traditional). 13:35:14 well I think that's a great example where we need to deal with exceptions, but that is not the case for the most of the world 13:35:17 ok, 13:35:49 which zht has no implications on anyth politically, which is the best solution IMHO 13:35:52 yn1v: I notice the way this is handled is different for the projeto fedora 13:35:59 kaio: +1 13:36:30 maybe pointing them to the wiki as kaio suggested could solve this 13:37:05 the 3 subdomains may point to a directory page on fp wiki, I personally prefer 13:37:24 sounds good, kaio 13:37:41 inquiring on the chinese list now, will finalize by next week 13:37:41 kaio: agree 13:37:59 yes, there is some infraestructure for latinamerica and some for Brazil... happened before I joined the project 13:38:07 so we can have them aggregated in one place 13:38:15 then we save resources and put them back on people and tech 13:39:00 In LATAM we have one community domain per country 13:39:03 yes, I like that of 3 subdomaing pointing the same place 13:39:21 in some countries are more than one community website 13:39:49 but we point to the ones represented by Fedora Ambassadors 13:40:09 we are pushing our comm channel from group forum, group blogs, group planet; to ask.fp.o, cloud microblog, and fp main planet. 13:41:11 making the chinese group lean but powerful 13:41:31 it looks like this is moving to a good direction 13:41:42 "cloud age" 13:41:59 #chair kaio igorps gbraad yn1v 13:41:59 Current chairs: gbraad igorps kaio yn1v 13:42:32 ok, so next week more progress will follow. next topic? 13:42:34 China is a big country with its specific characteristics we should deal with 13:42:57 igorps: we are dealing with it, however the issue also remains in getting contributors 13:43:07 I think we should talk about the schedule a bit 13:43:07 If nobody has something else, I will suggest look for tickets 13:43:13 this figure remained stable (in almost all communities) for several years 13:43:24 gbraad-china, +1 13:43:32 ++ pls move on 13:43:54 igorps, go ahead 13:43:55 thats good we have a few FADs this year 13:44:04 I would like to suggest a public meeting before the end of this term 13:44:05 #topic schedule 13:44:09 which has not happened before 13:44:44 although all our meetings are public 13:44:46 I like the idea. Let call for public meeting 13:45:14 but the idea is to answer questions about we have done this term and so on 13:45:42 is next week good for you guys? 13:45:57 ++ 13:46:26 If everything goes as planned I will be travelling back from Costa Rica 13:47:05 igorps: + 13:47:08 so, what about on the 26th 13:47:25 igorps: + 13:47:27 that will be fine with me 13:47:41 yn1v, good! 13:48:14 who is gonna invite/announce ? 13:48:14 ok 13:48:24 yn1v, I can do that 13:48:56 #action igorps to announce next FAmSCo public meeting on 26th 13:49:12 Another thing: 13:49:41 It's time to push media and material requests on regional communities 13:50:16 just a reminder for the regional meetings and mailing lists 13:50:26 good 13:50:42 yn1v, I'm done. :) 13:50:48 please move on 13:51:43 #idea remind about requesting materials in regional meetings 13:52:00 mether: welcome 13:52:04 shall we look at tickets? 13:52:26 mether: anything to add to our FAmSCo meeting? 13:53:08 I have a question. does anyone when the bidding for next APAC FUDCon starts? I would like to help out 13:53:52 mether: honestly do not know 13:54:01 thats alright. just checking 13:54:25 at the moment more involved in smaller scale events for Fedora in China 13:54:37 getting ready for having a FUDCon 13:54:38 I thought it was in SEPT, when I made the bid back then. :) 13:54:58 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_bid_process 13:54:59 kaio: I remember something about March. 13:55:04 mether, congratulations for FUDCon Pune. It seemed to be a great event. 13:55:13 igorps: +1 13:55:17 suppose to be 12month before the fudcon 13:55:28 igorps, thanks. yes it has gone exceptionally well 13:55:30 gbraad-china, ++ I hope it will happen in China, but if I am FAmSCo again I will analyse independently again... 13:55:54 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Premier_Fedora_events#Recurring_Premier_Fedora_Events 13:56:17 FUDCon APAC is schedule to March 1st - May 31st 13:56:54 I thought that the bid process was already opened 13:57:05 hmm 13:57:06 considering the dates 13:57:25 yes, there is an agreement to avoid having all the events close on dates 13:57:35 should avoid peak season of apac air fares 13:58:17 yes, there was a change in the FUDCon schedule 13:59:00 please ping jsmith about that 13:59:11 we have bids already: 13:59:12 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:APAC_2012_Bid_Malaysia 13:59:13 I think if a region has a good proposal then, it can be negotiable to switch with another region. The idea is to spread events on the whole year 13:59:47 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Bid_for_Beijing_2012 14:00:58 igorps: someone just renamed the page? 14:02:15 gbraad-china, it looks like they were updated from this year proposals 14:02:34 igorps: there is no official proposal from me and grace (RH Beijing) 14:02:48 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Bid_for_Beijing_2012 14:03:08 * kaio cloned and updated from 2011 wiki :P 14:04:04 Now the mystery is solved :) 14:04:25 kaio: I see, but Grace, Harish and I have decided to focus on FAD events first 14:04:33 there is always a wiki history avail 14:04:41 of course we can go for a big, but will likely result in a denial 14:05:02 * gbraad-china noticed the first commit was by an IP, the rest of the updates were kaio ;-) 14:05:14 s/big/bid 14:07:09 shall we move on ? 14:07:17 this is something you guys need to discuss regionally in order to decide to move forward with the proposal or not 14:07:32 yn1v, yes 14:07:45 igorps: +1 14:07:49 yn1v: +1 14:07:54 shall we look at tickets? or there is another topic? 14:08:09 yn1v, although I'll not bug you with tickets this week 14:08:23 nothing else from me 14:09:52 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/226 is open... 225 is the same, but 226 has more info 14:10:26 need more info about when, and links 14:12:10 there is https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/229 requesting materilas for sri lanka 14:12:14 Harish added a comment on 226 asking for more information 14:13:17 I wrote on 226 to post link to event page 14:14:46 The amount for #229 is 420 USD? 14:15:17 I not sure how 229 is actionable. 14:15:29 It does not said currency. 14:15:57 yep, needs more info as well 14:16:16 yn1v: incomplete information, ask for info, simple 14:17:18 done 14:18:04 anything more for this meeting? 14:18:08 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/230 14:18:31 hanoi release party 14:18:39 seems good 14:19:30 I'm not sure if those are USD too 14:19:32 I have personal interest in two tickets and as I am requesting I would like to somebody else to look at those 14:20:08 yn1v, which ones? 14:20:36 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/233 14:20:38 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/234 14:21:31 * igorps is taking a look 14:22:39 yn1v, no need to use PayPal this time? 14:22:53 I am avoiding using paypal at all cost 14:23:05 yn1v, +1 14:23:23 sounds reasonable to me 14:24:10 since you can pay directly for them everything will be pretty straightforward 14:24:15 +1 14:24:20 * jsmith joins the meeting late 14:24:51 kaio, gbraad objections? 14:25:13 jsmith, welcome! 14:26:06 no objection 14:26:57 yn1v, please move on with those and keep us updated :) 14:27:23 great. 14:27:27 no objections 14:27:46 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/231 is overdue 14:29:09 sadly nothing to do with that :( 14:29:22 https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/232 it is a reimbursement, for some shipment... we should suggest to jsimon to proceed with this 14:29:35 yn1v, +1 14:29:54 Also look if reimbursement is possible by this time 14:31:55 I have commented on both tickets. 14:32:08 Anything else? 14:32:34 jsmith, who is election wrangler ? 14:32:42 yn1v: I am 14:32:59 yn1v: Unfortuanately, I've been out most of the last week due to travel, etc. 14:33:24 I will sending my answers to the questionnaire shortly 14:33:43 Me too 14:33:57 anything else for this meeting ? 14:34:12 nothing else from me, yn1v 14:34:20 thanks for chairing 14:34:26 yn1v, igorps: Thanks... I'll be sending out a reminder email to those who may have forgotten to send their answers 14:35:24 jsmith, thanks, we were only in doubt about who was the wrangler 14:35:39 I will end this meeting in one minute 14:36:34 end meeting in 30 secs 14:37:39 thanks mether, gbraad , kaio, igorps, jsmith for participating on the meeting 14:38:18 #endmeeting