21:04:39 #startmeeting 21:04:39 Meeting started Tue Jan 31 21:04:39 2012 UTC. The chair is pcalarco. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:04:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 21:04:46 #topic Insight 21:05:24 hello :) 21:05:29 #topic roll call 21:05:36 #meetingname Insight 21:05:36 The meeting name has been set to 'insight' 21:05:37 hey tatica :) 21:05:39 * tatica here 21:05:48 is here 21:05:56 Hi tatica! 21:05:57 * asrob is here 21:07:04 okay, welcome all. asrob, do you know if the gobby notes are on the wiki anywhere? 21:07:14 from FUDCon, that is 21:07:22 pcalarco, no, I do not 21:07:35 I do 21:08:01 tatica: awesome! We should link to them from the Insight page 21:08:03 I think... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Insight_notes_from_FUDCon_Blacksburg_2012-01-15 21:08:16 oh, cool, thanks tatica 21:08:31 yay, thank you! 21:09:02 however, I made a short list 21:09:05 let me upload it somewhere 21:10:18 we can link to it from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Insight_use_cases_for_calendar 21:11:01 #info Notes from FUDCon Blacksburg are at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Insight_notes_from_FUDCon_Blacksburg_2012-01-15 21:13:34 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tatica/Insight 21:14:43 #info Summary notes from FUDCon Insight calendar discussion are at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tatica/Insight 21:14:57 tatica: wonderful, thanks 21:15:07 np 21:15:30 awesome 21:15:31 Perhaps I can turn it over to you to talk a bit about the mockups, tatica? 21:15:50 I bookmarked it 21:15:57 well, those mockups are only to show how layers might look 21:16:15 since I was checking a previous design that mizmo did for insight and i would like to keep it 21:16:19 #topic calendar mockups 21:16:35 however, she told me that there is not actually a theme packaged, so I might work on that this-next week 21:16:52 I have a couple of contributors from design that might be willing to help with this task 21:17:32 this is mizmo mockup http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:FooBar.png 21:17:55 tatica, ok, then I'll delete this theme, because this is adaptivetheme, http://drupal.org/project/adaptivetheme 21:18:14 Great. I am going to link your mockups in the minutes too 21:18:18 #link http://publictest04.fedoraproject.org/artboard/post/view/110 21:18:19 our old theme is ninesixty, http://drupal.org/project/ninesixty 21:18:30 #link http://publictest04.fedoraproject.org/artboard/post/view/111 21:18:40 #link http://publictest04.fedoraproject.org/artboard/post/view/112 21:18:43 yes, I think at some point I help a bit with the previous css 21:19:43 so, if I remember we would like to set up a schedule 21:19:58 however, I can only talk about design and theming, not about code 21:20:16 tatica, ninesixty drupal theme is not packaged, do I package that? 21:20:31 what would work better for you guys, a completely drupal based theme, or start with an html/css one? 21:21:06 I think if we could start with a Drupal theme, that would help maintainability 21:21:14 in the long run 21:21:30 I think it would be good a completely new drupal 7 theme based on ninesixty/adaptivetheme/whatever 21:21:37 yep 21:21:54 +1 21:22:45 ok 21:23:40 tatica, if you need help I'll be able to help you, there are some changes in drupal 7 theming 21:23:46 yeah 21:24:07 asrob: based on tatica's mockups, which do you see as easier to work with in terms of themes? Ninesixty, adaptive, or something else? 21:25:18 I think the mockups look pretty intuitive from what was discussed 21:25:29 pcalarco, actually, adaptive is 960 width theme but that is a little bit more 21:25:57 pcalarco, you know, HTML 5, responsive design and some cool things 21:26:04 the nice thing about adaptive is that it is mobile-ready, which is one of our longer term goals 21:26:12 yes, exactly 21:26:37 yeah 21:27:01 nice 21:27:15 tatica, what do you think? I think you should choose one ;) 21:27:47 yeah, I will take a look to those options and taking a look to the structure will pick one 21:30:11 ok, I'll package ninesixty and adaptivetheme as well 21:30:27 great, thanks asrob 21:30:34 :D 21:32:08 one of the next steps from Blacksburg was starting to document data models, content types and taxonomies; where to start on this, do you think? 21:32:41 that's good question 21:33:27 content types, I think we need plus one, its name is Event, for example 21:33:49 so we have to filter by that with Views module 21:34:18 yes 21:34:23 as you can see it on insight02.dev server 21:35:08 there is a "Filters based on location" requirement 21:35:22 #link https://insight02.dev.fedoraproject.org/ 21:35:41 I think this is a custom field in content type settings 21:36:49 I wonder with location if there are two attributes: Fedora Region and then country 21:37:16 so like LATAM and Nicaragua 21:37:51 hm 21:37:58 how do we handle this?! 21:38:44 I would think it would be fine to only have Fedora region, if it makes it easier from a data model standpoint 21:39:11 okay 21:39:20 there are few enough events in a single region that this should be fine 21:40:28 we could add a pop-up on start that makes you choose your location, or go general 21:40:31 just like airlines do 21:40:47 so do we start documenting all of the fields that we'd expect for each content type? How do you usually approach this, asrob? 21:40:48 and then if you need to change your geo-location, just go to your profile 21:40:56 +1 tatica 21:41:27 pcalarco, yes, we do 21:42:02 okay, we can start some wiki subpages for this 21:42:24 perhaps we can discuss here and then transfer to wiki after the meeting 21:42:32 sure 21:42:51 so what fields would we have for an Event? 21:43:01 event name 21:43:07 of course 21:43:10 date 21:43:21 time in UTC 21:43:40 title, date, body, location? 21:43:48 time could also be a range, for a conference 21:44:31 yes, location and body/description 21:44:41 owner 21:44:46 maybe on a 2nd stage we could add a schedule for that event. But since there is a lot to do, perhaps a timeset could work 21:45:43 the owner should point to a wiki User page 21:46:38 pcalarco, you just enter/link owner's name or something else? 21:46:50 should there be a separate field for URL of the event, or just include this in description? 21:47:02 http://publictest04.fedoraproject.org/artboard/post/view/112 21:47:08 yes, owner like /wiki/User:asrob 21:48:13 okay, but when you fill a new event out then you enter owner's name or that would be good, if it would be an autocomplete field or something like this? 21:48:33 some evnts are entered before they have an owner 21:48:45 ahh, got it, thanks 21:49:18 like a lot of the big Linux conferences; we just know that it is coming up, and then an Ambassador team forms around it to take ownership/responsibility 21:50:16 any other fields for Event, or move on to Meetings? 21:50:37 * tatica trying to do a mockup while you guys talk 21:50:54 pcalarco, team or interest field 21:50:59 and that's all 21:51:02 I guess 21:52:17 yes,possibly; most events get owned by Ambassadors, but occasionally there are events that are owned by other teams, like Design for the SXSW expo that Fedora had a booth for 21:53:02 well, can be own by anyone with a FAS account 21:53:03 we could add that in and see what makes sense for all 21:53:06 no need to be ambassador 21:53:14 tatica: correct, yes 21:53:27 so maybe just FAS name? 21:53:28 but an owner -should- at least have a FAS account 21:53:52 even if he's not the one who organize it, he'll be in charge of fedora image in there 21:53:57 whethere they have a wiki user page is nice, but perhaps not required? 21:54:00 I am not sure 21:54:02 so, a small requirement should be done 21:54:13 pcalarco, that could also work 21:54:19 commitment, we need that 21:54:34 we can ask stickster on the list for confirmation 21:54:58 so, okay that is Events, how about Meetings next? 21:55:07 meetings? 21:55:41 we can handle this with Event together 21:55:57 or is it completely different? 21:57:25 sorry folks, I got disconnected from freenode 21:57:37 #topic data models 21:57:59 http://publictest04.fedoraproject.org/artboard/post/view/114 21:58:44 ah, twitter feeds yes good idea 21:58:56 awesome 21:59:02 I like these ideas :) 21:59:16 maybe add some photos and blog post rss too, but that might be more complicated 21:59:19 twitter seems easier 21:59:34 +1 21:59:37 +1 22:00:40 looks great, tatica 22:01:01 pls don't see it as -design-, more as layout 22:01:27 okay, we are officially at time 22:02:06 that is a very good start, maybe next week we can review these and analyze meetings next 22:02:31 and then start building content types 22:02:41 yeap 22:02:59 yeah 22:03:00 excellent discussion, thank you tatica and asrob! 22:03:12 thank you tatica and pcalarco 22:03:21 np, thx you guys 22:03:28 make it easy to contribute :) 22:03:28 and thank you for your layout/design wizardry, tatica! 22:03:36 whatever! 22:03:59 it is easier to talk about when you see a visual strawman I think 22:04:05 ok, so who will send logs? 22:04:12 I will 22:04:17 #endmeeting