#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:51 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (adamw, 15:01:03)
- previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:05:09)
- kparal did not yet get a chance to propose
split installation release criteria (adamw,
15:07:33)
- wwoods not around to report on status of his
action item (adamw,
15:11:15)
- Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review (adamw, 15:11:27)
- we still haven't been able to spin an RC3 :(
unaddressed blockers remain. (adamw,
15:11:51)
- on the good side, we have pretty good RC2 test
coverage, just a couple of tests remain, we can knock those off
today (adamw,
15:12:45)
- Fedora 17 blocker review: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807510 (adamw, 15:13:59)
- AGREED: more
information needed on #807510 to reach a determination of blocker
status, tflink will test with his similar hardware (adamw,
15:30:21)
- Fedora 17 blocker review: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808029 (adamw, 15:30:52)
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-November/104481.html
has three +1 replies (adamw,
15:32:56)
- AGREED: 808029 is
accepted as a beta blocker per the criteria as they stand; criteria
modification proposal is pending but needs further discussion in
light of the virt-install use case (adamw,
15:45:47)
- Fedora 17 blocker/NTH review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808378 (adamw, 15:46:23)
- AGREED: #808378 is
accepted as NTH because 3.4 fixes several known bugs and we
obviously would prefer testing of final to testing of an obsolete
beta (adamw,
15:57:10)
- Fedora 17 blocker review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809052 (adamw, 15:58:16)
- AGREED: 809052 is a
blocker per the virtualization and 'installed system should boot to
working desktop' criteria, for the sufficiently common case of VM
using cirrus as the graphics driver (adamw,
16:17:11)
- 'Project' status (adamw, 16:19:36)
- AGREED: we're happy
for QA to officially become a 'Fedora project', we will stick the
drafted Governance section into the Wiki somewhere and let the board
know we're happy to accept project status. This decision does not in
any way influence the question of the QA/Bugzappers
relationship (adamw,
16:37:00)
- Test Day report (adamw, 16:38:22)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-27_Kdump
and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-29_Gnome_Shell_Software_Rendering
(adamw,
16:38:40)
- kdump looks like it was a bit doa, likely due
to late organization and lack of publicity (adamw,
16:40:51)
- shell software rendering seems to have gone off
pretty nicely, decent amount of testing and some useful
reports (adamw,
16:40:58)
- Upcoming QA events (adamw, 16:41:36)
- we have a couple more test days this week,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-04_Power_Management
and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-05_L10n_I18n_Installation
(adamw,
16:44:38)
- Go/No-Go #2 is scheduled for 04-04 (adamw,
16:44:46)
- AutoQA update (adamw, 16:45:05)
- no autoqa progress atm, too much Beta
testing (adamw,
16:48:19)
- Open Floor (adamw, 16:48:26)
Meeting ended at 16:51:03 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (231)
- VICODAN (105)
- tflink (78)
- j_dulaney (52)
- kparal (47)
- brunowolff (27)
- Viking-Ice (8)
- zodbot (6)
- Southern_Gentlem (4)
- jskladan (3)
- pjones (2)
- ianweller (1)
- mkrizek (1)
- satellit_ (1)
- rbergeron (1)
- j_dulaney1 (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.