==================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==================================


Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:51 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-04-02/fedora-qa.2012-04-02-15.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call  (adamw, 15:01:03)

* previous meeting follow-up  (adamw, 15:05:09)
  * kparal did not yet get a chance to propose split installation
    release criteria  (adamw, 15:07:33)
  * wwoods not around to report on status of his action item  (adamw,
    15:11:15)

* Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review  (adamw, 15:11:27)
  * we still haven't been able to spin an RC3 :( unaddressed blockers
    remain.  (adamw, 15:11:51)
  * on the good side, we have pretty good RC2 test coverage, just a
    couple of tests remain, we can knock those off today  (adamw,
    15:12:45)

* Fedora 17 blocker review:
  http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807510  (adamw, 15:13:59)
  * AGREED: more information needed on #807510 to reach a determination
    of blocker status, tflink will test with his similar hardware
    (adamw, 15:30:21)

* Fedora 17 blocker review:
  http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808029  (adamw, 15:30:52)
  * LINK:
    https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-November/104481.html
    has three +1 replies  (adamw, 15:32:56)
  * AGREED: 808029 is accepted as a beta blocker per the criteria as
    they stand; criteria modification proposal is pending but needs
    further discussion in light of the virt-install use case  (adamw,
    15:45:47)

* Fedora 17 blocker/NTH review -
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808378  (adamw, 15:46:23)
  * AGREED: #808378 is accepted as NTH because 3.4 fixes several known
    bugs and we obviously would prefer testing of final to testing of an
    obsolete beta  (adamw, 15:57:10)

* Fedora 17 blocker review -
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809052  (adamw, 15:58:16)
  * AGREED: 809052 is a blocker per the virtualization and 'installed
    system should boot to working desktop' criteria, for the
    sufficiently common case of VM using cirrus as the graphics driver
    (adamw, 16:17:11)

* 'Project' status  (adamw, 16:19:36)
  * AGREED: we're happy for QA to officially become a 'Fedora project',
    we will stick the drafted Governance section into the Wiki somewhere
    and let the board know we're happy to accept project status. This
    decision does not in any way influence the question of the
    QA/Bugzappers relationship  (adamw, 16:37:00)

* Test Day report  (adamw, 16:38:22)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-27_Kdump and
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-29_Gnome_Shell_Software_Rendering
    (adamw, 16:38:40)
  * kdump looks like it was a bit doa, likely due to late organization
    and lack of publicity  (adamw, 16:40:51)
  * shell software rendering seems to have gone off pretty nicely,
    decent amount of testing and some useful reports  (adamw, 16:40:58)

* Upcoming QA events  (adamw, 16:41:36)
  * we have a couple more test days this week,
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-04_Power_Management
    and
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-05_L10n_I18n_Installation
    (adamw, 16:44:38)
  * Go/No-Go #2 is scheduled for 04-04  (adamw, 16:44:46)

* AutoQA update  (adamw, 16:45:05)
  * no autoqa progress atm, too much Beta testing  (adamw, 16:48:19)

* Open Floor  (adamw, 16:48:26)

Meeting ended at 16:51:03 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (231)
* VICODAN (105)
* tflink (78)
* j_dulaney (52)
* kparal (47)
* brunowolff (27)
* Viking-Ice (8)
* zodbot (6)
* Southern_Gentlem (4)
* jskladan (3)
* pjones (2)
* ianweller (1)
* mkrizek (1)
* satellit_ (1)
* rbergeron (1)
* j_dulaney1 (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot