#fedora-meeting: fedora-qa
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:14 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll call (adamw, 15:00:22)
- Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:03:36)
- "adamw to review F17 retrospective and come up
with an action plan" - this is mostly complete and some parts will
be discussed today (adamw,
15:04:35)
- "adamw to work with rbergeron to make sure
housekeeping gets done for f16/f17/f18" - adam contacted robyn and
spot, did not yet receive replies (adamw,
15:05:13)
- "tflink to fix up blocker bug page for new
bugzilla, probably as fedora-hosted static HTML rather than in MW" -
work is in progress, hitting some 'proxy errors' from bugzilla but
this is likely an error on the server end not in the script
(adamw,
15:08:47)
- "tflink to set up QA git account" - this has
been done, see
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/browser/QA%20git (adamw,
15:10:29)
- http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=fedora-qa.git
(kparal,
15:11:56)
- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/gitfedora-qa
(kparal,
15:13:16)
- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/gitfedora-qa
(tflink,
15:14:22)
- to get write access to git, apply to the
gitfedora-qa group in FAS, and probably let adamw/tflink/kparal know
why you need it. (adamw,
15:15:08)
- ARM as a primary arch (adamw, 15:15:30)
- http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/arm-nightlies/
(adamw,
15:19:42)
- supported ARM implementations are pandaboard,
trimslice, highbank, beagleboard, kirkwood and Raspberry Pi;
currently QA has a pandaboard and a trimslice, and some Pis on
order. Also an XO 1.75, which is not listed (adamw,
15:30:56)
- j_dulaney and nb believe there is budget
available to get more hardware (adamw,
15:31:13)
- question arises as to whether, with ARM as a
primary arch, we hold an entire release due to one ARM
implementation being broken (adamw,
15:32:08)
- Fedora 17 retrospective (adamw, 15:39:40)
- AGREED: there is a
consensus that we liked doing go/no-go on Thursdays and would like
to schedule it that way for F18 (adamw,
15:45:15)
- AGREED: group agrees
that we should aim to roll RCs as soon as possible after change
deadline rather than schedule a specific day for them (adamw,
15:54:13)
- ACTION: adamw to
start a list thread for further discussion of the blocker review
meeting time topic (adamw,
16:02:24)
- ACTION: adamw to
start a list thread about ways to analyze the corpus of blocker
bugs (adamw,
16:08:10)
- AutoQA update (adamw, 16:08:46)
- Open Floor (kparal, 16:10:00)
- http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2u-weN31BFs/SJ8EEVM5sBI/AAAAAAAAAkc/87BYNgPz7BU/s400/hold-a-meeting.jpg
(jskladan,
16:13:27)
Meeting ended at 16:22:20 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- adamw to start a list thread for further discussion of the blocker review meeting time topic
- adamw to start a list thread about ways to analyze the corpus of blocker bugs
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to start a list thread for further discussion of the blocker review meeting time topic
- adamw to start a list thread about ways to analyze the corpus of blocker bugs
People present (lines said)
- adamw (134)
- j_dulaney (61)
- tflink (38)
- rbergeron (28)
- kparal (19)
- akshayvyas (13)
- jskladan (6)
- zodbot (4)
- Cerlyn (4)
- brunowolff (3)
- nb (3)
- nirik (2)
- mkrizek (1)
- pschindl (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.