13:59:50 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 13:59:50 Meeting started Mon Oct 1 13:59:50 2012 UTC. The chair is bcotton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:03 #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:00:03 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:00:13 #topic Roll Call 14:00:30 * jjmcd sort of 14:00:51 * randomuser nods resolutely 14:01:01 * iambryan is mostly here 14:01:21 * Capesteve waves 14:01:46 * Capesteve is going out in 15 mins 14:02:30 #chair jjmcd 14:02:30 Current chairs: bcotton jjmcd 14:02:55 * LoKoMurdoK here 14:02:59 * LoKoMurdoK late 14:05:22 okay, let's do this 14:05:26 #topic Follow up on last week's action items 14:05:30 no sparks :-( 14:05:39 #action Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures 14:05:48 i don't think i saw a pkovar either 14:06:09 so i can't have him confirm that i have the TX info in the Doc Guide correct, but i think it is 14:06:46 #topic Fedora 18 schedule 14:06:51 #undo 14:06:51 Removing item from minutes: 14:06:54 * pkovar1 is late 14:06:59 oh, hey, pkovar1 i was just talking about you 14:07:12 bcotton: great :-) 14:07:27 * jhradilek sneaks in. 14:07:48 pkovar1: did you see the email i sent re: TX in the Doc Guide? I believe it is correct per the wiki link you referenced last week 14:07:49 * randomuser considers filing bug against documentation guide for zanata info and assigning to jreed 14:08:03 randomuser: i am not opposed to this :-) 14:08:24 * bcotton would like to see the Documentation Guide be the go-to source for how to do docs work 14:09:01 bcotton: sorry, haven!t had time yet to reply, but i will compare the instructions in the guide and on that wiki page 14:09:06 and will let you know 14:09:56 pkovar1: okay great 14:10:01 i think that those lang codes that we include in the tx config file might be outdated in the guide 14:10:09 but need to check first 14:10:22 i only keep them up-to-date on the wiki now 14:10:25 i _think_ i updated those. but who knows 14:10:40 bcotton: oh, ok, great 14:10:55 #topic Fedora 18 schedule 14:11:04 #link http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html 14:11:09 #info Guides scheduled to be branched 2 October 14:11:14 #info POT files for guides due 2 October 14:11:20 oh golly, that's tomorrow! 14:12:28 any guide owners in the room who want to own up to their readiness for this? 14:13:33 okay, any general discussion of the schedule? 14:13:34 we might consider a pragmatic approach, and slip the schedule 14:13:44 agreed 14:14:22 randomuser: by how much? we can always ask jreznik to edit his taskjuggler file for us 14:14:37 (though, as i told jreed on the list, the schedule has always been more of a suggestion) 14:14:38 * jreznik is listening :) 14:14:50 * iambryan tentatively ready... is there a time for for Oct 2 branching? 14:15:11 bcotton, i don't have enough experience to gauge that, but I did note that there hasn't been all that much commit traffic 14:16:06 iambryan: sometime on Oct 2 :-) 14:16:24 bcotton: :P Thanks 14:16:27 pkovar1: you sit on the translation side, too. how much of a slip is too much? 14:17:00 btw. trac to report schedule adjustments https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-project-schedule/ - and of course, you can ping me anytime :) 14:17:08 * jreznik is going to announce it soon 14:17:38 that really depends on the individual guides i think 14:17:43 and their maintainers 14:17:51 who can decide to commit f18 updates later 14:17:51 jreznik: NEAT! 14:17:57 eg just before the release 14:18:20 but generally, four or three weeks should be enough 14:18:36 pkovar1: 3-4 weeks from release or 3-4 weeks of slip? 14:18:53 3-4 weeks from release i mean 14:19:02 okay, great 14:19:16 Isn't it 3-4 weeks before the RPM is due? 14:19:39 which always seems to be long before the release 14:19:43 jjmcd: that's just for the RN though, right? 14:19:54 Oh right, nobody else does RPMs 14:20:59 so 4 weeks before GA is 30 October 14:20:59 right 14:21:08 which is a 4 week slip 14:21:16 so i guess i didn't need to ask pkovar1 for a clarification :-) 14:21:39 that's a plenty of time 14:21:45 :-) 14:22:34 since pkovar1 promises that translators won't complain about the schedule change (i think most guides come in around then anyway, so it's effectively not a real change)... 14:22:35 AFAIK we need more time for some guides like sys admin guide anyway 14:22:39 bcotton, rather than a slip, we could remove the initial 'push pot' schedule entry, so the schedule reads 'push your pots against beta, and again before GA' 14:22:58 bcotton: actually, i can't promise anything :-) 14:23:08 pkovar1: would it be easier for translators to have multiple POT pushes, or a single one that's more final? 14:23:17 that's my estimation 14:23:41 Keep in mind that the beta POT push is supposed to be the main one - release should be just minor changes 14:23:49 if ther is a lost of content, i'd say more pushes are more helpful 14:23:58 * a lot of content 14:25:14 ideally, we should only make minor changes 3-4 weeks before ga 14:25:44 but then there's the reality 14:26:04 so how about i fork jreznik's schedule and we heavily edit it between now and next week's meeting 14:26:22 bcotton: sounds good 14:26:24 and we can get input from the translators and the docs contributors who can't make the meeting 14:26:45 yes, let's CC translators ML on this 14:27:01 #action bcotton to set up strawman schedule to propose slip for guides due dates 14:27:47 #info we will decide the future of the guides schedule at the 8 October meeting 14:29:19 and I can merge it back to the main schedule once you're done 14:29:34 excellent 14:29:44 anything else on the schedule? 14:30:36 #topic Release Notes 14:30:43 #info wiki freeze 2 October 14:30:55 that's also tomorrow (and less likely to be pushed back a month) 14:31:39 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats 14:32:25 #help There are a lot of beats not marked as good yet. If you have time today, please write a few 14:34:27 anything to discuss re: release notes? 14:34:49 i pushed a draft technical notes that could help beats writers with focus 14:35:02 #info randomuser pushed a draft technical notes that could help beats writers with focus 14:36:41 anything else? 14:36:58 randomuser: do you have the url handy? 14:37:30 http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Technical_Notes/index.html 14:37:46 Thanks 14:37:52 #link http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Technical_Notes/index.html 14:39:44 #topic Outstanding BZ Ticket 14:39:54 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 14:41:04 #topic Open floor discussion 14:41:23 #help Volunteer needed to lead the 8 October meeting (bcotton will not be available) 14:42:11 * randomuser wants to help, but isn't going to 14:42:25 unpredictable $DAYJOB responsibilities 14:43:39 bcotton: so should we discuss the schedule changes in two weeks then? 14:43:44 maybe I can find Sparks later and make him do it 14:44:12 pkovar1: i'd rather get it decided sooner, even if i'm not around. i'll be available via email, but i won't be able to IRC 14:47:19 anythign else for today's meeting? 14:48:50 * bcotton bangs gavel 14:48:53 thanks everyone! 14:48:54 #endmeeting