#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:53 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call (adamw, 15:00:57)
- Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 15:05:33)
- "adamw to report recommendation to fesco
ticket" - did that (it was the freeze-or-not-freeze ticket)
(adamw,
15:06:15)
- Fedora 18 Beta status / mini blocker review (adamw, 15:07:16)
- Go/No-Go is Thursday, we need to have RC spun
by tomorrow really (adamw,
15:10:13)
- still waiting on fedup to be fully available
but tflink has been testing it and filing bugs with Will
(adamw,
15:10:30)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868834 (adamw, 15:14:24)
- AGREED: #868834 is
accepted as a blocker per criterion "The installer must be able to
successfully complete a scripted installation, using the installer's
preferred scripting system, which duplicates the default interactive
installation as closely as possible" (adamw,
15:17:57)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869839 (adamw, 15:18:09)
- AGREED: 869839 is
rejected as a blocker on the basis it seems to be specific to btrfs
and possibly certain btrfs configurations, and is easily
workaroundable. accepted as NTH as it could affect 'testability' of
custom partitioning (adamw,
15:29:20)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870268 (adamw, 15:29:32)
- AGREED: 870268 is
accepted as NTH: some debate over whether Macs are really prevalent
enough for blocker status (adamw,
15:36:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869061 (adamw, 15:37:50)
- AGREED: cannot
determine state of #869061 without an answer to the question about
what are the implications about taking or not taking the fix in the
f18 beta frozen package set (adamw,
15:47:20)
- Release criteria / test cases (adamw, 15:47:54)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869061
(Viking-Ice,
15:48:30)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844167
(Viking-Ice,
15:49:29)
- ACTION: adamw to
finally finish drafting revised partitioning criteria (adamw,
15:52:01)
- ACTION: adamw to push
security criterion into 'production' after waiting a few more days
for feedback (adamw,
15:55:58)
- open floor (adamw, 15:58:10)
- open floor - LVM-by-default discussion (adamw, 15:58:36)
- FESCo ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/964 , bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870207 (adamw,
15:58:58)
- AGREED: QA agrees
that any decision to take LVM-by-default made after today
(2012-10-29) must include a slip for testing (adamw,
16:26:56)
- viking-ice argues that even a decision to take
LVM-by-default made today should include a slip, there is not
complete agreement on this and there are too few people present to
vote on the idea (adamw,
16:27:40)
Meeting ended at 16:34:25 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- adamw to finally finish drafting revised partitioning criteria
- adamw to push security criterion into 'production' after waiting a few more days for feedback
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to finally finish drafting revised partitioning criteria
- adamw to push security criterion into 'production' after waiting a few more days for feedback
People present (lines said)
- adamw (207)
- Viking-Ice (90)
- kparal (50)
- jreznik (31)
- Southern_Gentlem (7)
- jskladan (4)
- zodbot (4)
- garretraziel (3)
- tflink (2)
- mkrizek (2)
- satellit_ (1)
- pschindl (1)
- viking-ice (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.