19:36:53 #startmeeting Fedora Board Meeting 19:36:54 Meeting started Wed Nov 7 19:36:53 2012 UTC. The chair is rbergeron. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:36:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:37:01 #meetingname Board Meeting 19:37:01 The meeting name has been set to 'board_meeting' 19:37:09 #topic Who's here? 19:37:18 * jreznik_ is here 19:37:21 * inode0 is here 19:37:56 * Sparks_too is here 19:38:02 * pbrobinson is here 19:38:03 * abadger1999 here 19:38:14 #chair jreznik inode0 Sparks_too pbrobinson abadger1999 19:38:14 Current chairs: Sparks_too abadger1999 inode0 jreznik pbrobinson rbergeron 19:38:48 #topic Today's Agenda 19:38:54 Hi guys. 19:39:07 hi 19:39:14 So I had a few things on the agenda, we can add if needed 19:39:57 #info Announcements, Open Q&A, FUDCon NA, Release Name, CWG stuff, 19:40:13 Anything else I'm missing? 19:40:30 Elections? 19:40:40 * Sparks is here too 19:40:46 inode0: yeah, i was going to kind of jam that into announcements 19:40:52 ooh, multi-sparks 19:41:05 #topic Announcements 19:41:42 jreznik: do you want to start with stuff? 19:41:51 release-related stuff? 19:41:56 rbergeron: ok, I can do it 19:42:08 as you can see the long fesco mess above... 19:43:08 #info FESCo decided to unfreeze for two weeks to allow fedup, secure boot and anaconda to get into the shape 19:43:54 fedup? I'll have to do a search on that one. 19:44:19 #info this means we will unfreeze (based on current status) on Dec 13, Beta is now Dec 27 19:44:25 Sparks: upgrade tool 19:44:34 jreznik: Nice name 19:44:40 * rbergeron says "beta dec. 27"? 19:44:42 Sparks: anaconda no longer does upgrades. Instead we have fedup 19:44:47 beta in the middle of the holidays? OK! 19:45:10 abadger1999: I've tried to stay away from that discussion. 19:45:14 * rbergeron thinks nov. 27 :) and final in dec. jan 19:45:17 19:45:18 * cwickert is here, too 19:45:23 #chair cwickert 19:45:23 Current chairs: Sparks_too abadger1999 cwickert inode0 jreznik pbrobinson rbergeron 19:45:23 so are the repos opening up between now and a little bit later? 19:45:55 rbergeron: ah, sorry 19:46:06 #undo 19:46:06 Removing item from minutes: 19:46:18 just too tired from the discussion 19:47:13 okay, so beyond that: 19:47:37 #info Elections - nominations are now open 19:47:43 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections 19:47:58 #info as is the questionnaire 19:49:09 * rbergeron looks for other elaborations or announcements 19:49:41 * inode0 just encourages people to think about running 19:49:58 * rbergeron agrees 19:50:49 running for election candidates? 19:50:58 also 19:51:00 for the hills? :) 19:51:14 I was thinking of away in general :) 19:51:25 it is a general health thing, just run 19:51:29 well, ready for schedule, second try 19:51:42 jreznik: go for it 19:52:18 #info Freeze (tenative) Nov 13, Beta release Nov 27 (two weeks slip) 19:52:37 #info Final change deadline 2012 Dec 18, Fedora 18 final release 2013 Jan 08 19:53:38 that's all and I hope it's correct now... 19:53:41 okay. 19:53:45 * rbergeron will move onwards! 19:53:55 #topic Open Q&A 19:54:30 #info This is the portion of the meeting we reserve for questioning and comments and otherwise! 19:54:34 If you have anything, speak up now :) 19:56:53 * inode0 thinks maybe fesco wore everyone out 19:56:56 yeah. 19:57:18 * rbergeron looks around and moves on to FUDCon topic 19:57:27 #info If any questions come up, speak up :) 19:57:31 #topic FUDCon NA 19:58:02 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Lawrence_2013 19:58:29 #info Book your hotel. Subsidy requests are now open. :) 19:58:43 Question on this point 19:59:03 I guess I'd like to start thinking about how we can start driving groups to think about planning what they want to do at FUDCon. 19:59:07 inode0: go for it 19:59:25 With a subsidy deadline looming how do we want/intend to deal with FADNA participants who can't yet book a room? 19:59:41 Or more generally, how should they apply for subsidies if they need them? 19:59:59 inode0: you mean the issue of "rooms aren't available for the day before yet" 20:00:32 that and do you want them to apply for a FUDCon subsidy or request FAD funding in some other way? 20:01:22 yeah. I'm thinking through it. 20:01:53 guys, do you still have a lot to discuss? we should start our meeting now. Should we wait or move to another room? 20:01:58 I think we should have them apply for subsidies and we'll figure out the FAD granting approval inthe interim and perhaps if they don't need a subsidy after all then they can retract it? 20:02:11 sesivany: oh, emea didn't move their meeting? 20:02:42 rbergeron: no, we never do. does it collide with anything regular now? 20:03:03 sesivany: the board moved the meeting forward an hour UTC to keep people on the same relative time. 20:03:12 I guess you guys stayed on UTC time. 20:03:35 sorry, I guess we didn't consider collisions there 20:04:09 rbergeron: no prob, we can move to fedora-meeting-1 or 2. 20:04:24 rbergeron: same relative time for you maybe, I think all others are on DST so changed :) 20:04:40 no, it's forward for me an hour, 12:30 instead of 11:30 20:04:55 I mean it's an hour forward in UTC :) 20:05:32 * giallu would also move the EMEA one, 21 is too early anyway... 20:05:32 okay, inode0: back to your question - does that seem reasonable? allocate FAD money and have people apply regardless and just note they are also looking to attend the FAD? 20:05:40 #chair gholms 20:05:40 Current chairs: Sparks_too abadger1999 cwickert gholms inode0 jreznik pbrobinson rbergeron 20:05:48 * gholms is here, distracted by a meeting 20:06:15 yes, I'll tell people who are applying anyway and attending the FAD to mention the FAD in their application 20:07:08 ok, EMEA Fedora ambassadors, let's move to fedora-meeting-2! 20:07:16 #action inode0 to tell folks applying/attending FAD to apply for subsidy and mention the FAD in the app 20:08:31 I guess I'd like to just point out that I'd like to have people thinking about what we can accomplish at FUDCon. 20:08:42 Even if it's nudging individual teams to start thinking. 20:09:44 rbergeron: I think it's quite clear based on the discussion on the lists 20:09:57 and that would be the whole FUDCon I'd say... 20:10:24 and Board should probably start looking on it now 20:10:56 jreznik: i don't just mean fesco/devel stuff, i mean "everyone" ;) 20:11:12 rbergeron: it's not a FESCo issue I'd say 20:11:15 but that as well 20:11:26 ARM team is already discussing what they want to achieve 20:11:31 pbrobinson: excellente :) 20:12:22 maybe it is a good board list discussion as well. 20:13:22 * rbergeron passes out caffeine 20:13:37 Shall I move on to other topics? ;) 20:14:35 do you want us to be suggesting things for other groups to accomplish? :) 20:15:06 I want us to be suggesting to groups that they can think big. :) 20:15:52 :) 20:16:35 okay, I'm moving on, since clearly everyone is hopping up and down ;) 20:16:50 #topic Release Name / Voting stuff 20:17:27 So I think the end-point here is that getting this up in teh election system is imminent. 20:18:17 * rbergeron is beat, heh 20:19:08 Are we agreed to pass along all named signed off on be legal at this point? 20:19:13 names 20:19:18 by 20:19:24 should I start over? 20:19:29 sure. ;) 20:19:44 Are we agreed to pass along all names signed off on by legal at this point? 20:20:04 works for me 20:20:40 * rbergeron is +1 as well 20:20:47 * abadger1999 is fine with that 20:21:08 worksforme 20:21:23 and inode0 is a less than enthusiastic +1 20:21:35 * jreznik is ok too 20:21:42 so the voting app is all that remains to get in place 20:22:30 * rbergeron can attempt to get it set up this afternoon in a few hours, though i have a hard stop in like, 5m 20:22:36 abadger1999: want to train me? 20:22:47 inode0: the instructions are dead simple. 20:23:17 that said i haven't actually *done it*, just "seen how it's done and wow that looks easy" (unless you foul it up, i guess) 20:23:23 inode0: Sure, http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/docs/voting.txt 20:23:25 * inode0 is going to feel really bad now when he can't figure them out 20:23:53 inode0: go ahead and try and if you get stuck, holer at me to fix it :-) 20:24:09 that said, ke4qqq tried to do it the other day, but it was kicking him out 20:24:25 not sure if it's because he's not a sponsor or admin in that group (i bumped him up to sponsor but then he got sidetracked i think) 20:24:27 I probably need to be added to some group 20:24:28 .fasinfo ke4qqq 20:24:29 abadger1999: User: ke4qqq, Name: David Nalley, email: david@gnsa.us, Creation: 2006-02-21, IRC Nick: ke4qqq, Timezone: US/Eastern, Locale: en, GPG key ID: E70D2357, Status: active 20:24:32 abadger1999: Approved Groups: +elections cla_fedora cla_done ambassadors marketing fedorabugs fedora-board sysadmin sysadmin-test +gitfedora-cms @cmsadmin cvsfedora @gitfedora-zikula sysadmin-hosted @gitzenoss-esxi gitidentigator @docs +gitdocsite-publican @docs-writers @docs-publishers gitbeefymiracle +packager provenpackager cla_fpca 20:24:41 abadger1999: he was elections without the minus before. 20:24:52 20:24:57 I don't think that would be an issue. 20:24:59 inode0: yeah, you need to be in elections, but not sure if as a user, sponsor, or admin 20:25:09 abadger1999: but I got in just fine at the same time 20:25:09 ok, I'll try after work tonight if that is ok 20:25:10 I can look next time someone has an issue 20:25:56 * rbergeron nods 20:26:22 inode0: you are in the proper group now. ping me if there's issues 20:26:23 once that is done we can announce it with a week to run more or less 20:26:31 oh, and toshoi already added you 20:26:35 toshio 20:26:39 okay 20:27:07 * rbergeron thinks we can move on to CWG - but I will need to pass the reins to someone to finish it up/close out mtg 20:28:02 sadly 20:28:08 #topic CWG stuff 20:29:00 abadger1999: did you have responses? :) 20:29:09 rbergeron: not yet. 20:29:14 okay then! 20:29:18 well, that was easy. :) 20:29:19 :-) 20:29:27 I sent the invite this morning 20:29:35 so I was a bit behind. 20:29:37 #info CWG responses to be reviewed next week 20:29:38 * Sparks thinks that silence means that they want to be on the team 20:29:41 abadger1999: it's all good 20:29:43 Heh 20:29:45 sparks: you were first on the list 20:29:47 * inode0 doesn't know how anyone could say no to that invitation 20:29:47 followed by gholms 20:29:48 Hopefully we'll have some "yes"'s next week :-) 20:29:58 rbergeron: I believe that's a conflict of interest 20:30:22 * rbergeron really has to go - does someone want to wrap up / quick check for any other questions/topics? 20:30:26 * rbergeron thinks everyone is chaired 20:30:39 * abadger1999 can do 20:30:41 don't worry, someone will do it 20:31:19 .topic Open Floor 20:31:26 #topic Open Floor 20:31:45 Anything else to bring up? 20:32:27 not from me 20:33:03 alrighty. If no one has anything I'll close in 60s 20:33:34 30 20:34:09 #endmeeting