14:01:27 #startmeeting Fedora Documentation Project 14:01:27 Meeting started Mon Mar 11 14:01:27 2013 UTC. The chair is randomuser`. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:45 #meetingname https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:01:45 The meeting name has been set to 'https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/docs_project_meetings' 14:01:56 #topic Roll Call 14:02:10 * iambryans is here 14:02:28 * jjmcd 14:02:43 * pkovar is here 14:03:06 * jreznik is here too 14:03:49 #chair jjmcd 14:03:49 Current chairs: jjmcd randomuser` 14:04:10 we'll give the stragglers a minute 14:04:17 * jsmith is lurking 14:05:02 * bcotton is here 14:05:28 hrmm.. stale action items in the agenda 14:05:56 * jreznik has one topic to discuss with docs team 14:05:58 #topic We have no action items to discuss 14:06:09 #chair jreznik 14:06:09 Current chairs: jjmcd jreznik randomuser` 14:06:16 go ahead, jreznik 14:07:09 well it's follow up to the discussion on how treat features and release notes and marketing from docs list 14:07:27 and I'd like to move it on :) it seems like it stalled on the list 14:08:38 FESCo agreed on a feature process revamp 14:08:42 * Sparks is here 14:09:06 it's now more planning process and the marketing part should be separated from now 14:09:16 jreznik, I think we stalled in anticipation of reviewing the changed process - iirc you were working out details at the time 14:09:46 randomuser`: yep, I was working on the details - and now I have a better overview as it was accepted :) 14:09:58 finally 14:10:14 * jreznik thinks the email thread is better for discussion to let people read it 14:11:01 okay 14:11:01 I provided few more details/ideas there, feel free to ask me for more or come with other ideas - I still don't have 100% clear idea how to do it, waiting for more input 14:11:44 you're referring to your mail on 04 Mar ? 14:11:45 so that's probably all from me for now 14:12:20 yep, Re: Documenting Features 14:13:04 #info jreznik would like our input on the planning process, re: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2013-March/014857.html 14:13:15 #topic Planing Process (retroactive) 14:13:58 I have to admit to not paying much attention, but the overview in the email looks great 14:14:48 We'll give everyone some time to review in the background and we can come back to it at the tail of the meeting if need be 14:15:00 #topic docs infrastructure 14:15:02 thanks guys! 14:15:45 we're changing our publishing platform at some point 14:17:02 I'm not sure to what, so I can't report much here. I *am* a bit worried that we'll find out late, and have a rush to update process docs and sort out koji ACLs 14:17:15 Of course 14:17:57 We probably need a process 14:18:20 We seem to change every 3 or 4 releases, so we probably should come up with a way to ease the pain 14:18:25 heh 14:18:49 I've got the seed of a process around here somewhere 14:19:24 In general we can assume that the versioned branch of our git repo is kept at a releaseable state 14:19:51 and cgit can spin up tarballs for us 14:19:55 For RNs that makes sense, does it for guides tho? 14:20:45 well, it's an easy way to spin up a multi-lang RPM - and I understand the publican3 web platform eats them 14:21:21 cool 14:21:39 So we could simply make the tarball at a point where the branch is ready 14:21:45 yes 14:21:53 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Immanetize/Packaging_Docs_in_an_RPM 14:21:56 We wouldn't be blindsided by partial stuff magically appearing 14:22:13 very much WIP here, but you can get the gist 14:23:12 we have a koji tag for our production docs, but the same or similar process could also see them shipped to users 14:23:21 Do we want to ship docs to users? 14:24:49 randomuser`: It will be possible once we start publishing using RPMs. 14:25:07 * randomuser` nods 14:25:10 randomuser`: But I think we should finish that portion before we start handing out the repo address. 14:25:34 fair point, Sparks 14:26:19 If we *do* put our docs in the main repos, we will need packagers to maintain them 14:26:55 in our own tag, we *might* be able to get away with giving docs-publishers access, but we have to play by the rules in the user repoos 14:27:34 So, something to keep in mind: If you want your guide to be available that way, you need to become a packager 14:29:14 #topic Beat Assignments 14:29:36 Most of the beats have been spoken for - this is just a reminder 14:30:01 thanks to everyone taking the time for it 14:30:25 #topic F19 Schedule is out 14:30:32 #link http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/ 14:31:40 that could have been worse... 14:31:59 randomuser`, look what you did :) 14:32:03 Anyway, please take a moment to review the schedule, write it on your desk blotter, put it into your phone, etc 14:32:34 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 14:32:45 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 14:33:22 iambryan put a lot of work into our list of bugs over the weekend - kudos due 14:34:22 Anyone have bug troubles they'd like to discuss? 14:36:21 okay, we'll move on 14:36:30 #topic Sparks' Bug Corner 14:36:44 #link http://tinyurl.com/agh4mg6 14:36:59 there's one bug on here - sponsorship on docs.fp.o 14:37:14 randomuser`: I didn't mean to have my own, personal bug corner. 14:37:20 :) 14:37:29 iambryan, you found that we could do this with a change to the publican brand 14:37:43 Sparks, it's named in your honor, of course :) 14:37:51 heh 14:37:51 btw. for schedule - it does not contain the patch from bcotton he sent me for F18, I'll try to rebase it (sorry for OT, /me was out for a moment) 14:38:07 thanks jreznik 14:38:52 yes, that is correct, we just need to reference a URL from the root of the proxy.server 14:39:01 If we can wrangle someone to write a patch for publican-fedora, nb and sgordon allegedly can commit it 14:40:50 *crickets* 14:41:02 okay, no volunteers 14:41:25 #topic Open Floor Discussion 14:42:17 pkovar, did you want to add anything yet on /usr/share/help and shell integration? 14:43:09 randomuser`: no news at this point. there have several people commenting but that's it 14:43:17 * been 14:43:57 yes, i was one. We won't have any issues packaging, i think, but the shell integration is a black box to me 14:44:48 randomuser` so far it looks like gnome devs would prefer us to package PDFs 14:44:52 instead of html files 14:45:08 as the pdfs would integrate more easily 14:45:14 in the Documents app 14:45:35 that has been improved in f 19 / rawhide 14:45:40 re: search 14:45:47 hmm... 14:46:35 ive always thought PDFs were a poor way to ship content that wasn't going to be printed, but I suppose there are advantages 14:46:51 randomuser`: +1 14:46:59 with that not-so-new app Documents, yes 14:47:37 it could probably integrate with a bunch of html files for a guide as well 14:47:50 randomuser`: Oh, I have something. 14:48:20 +1 for html, pdf tends to be too leaden I find 14:48:55 PDFs also have problems rendering for people with handicaps that need larger text, etc. 14:49:10 HTML and ePub are much better for those things. 14:49:16 pkovar, let's table it pending further input from the gnome folks - i'd like to see integration, but we have already tabled packaging in general for now 14:49:42 fine with me. thanks 14:49:49 maybe a calibre repo with epubs? 14:49:56 Sparks, ? 14:50:13 iambryan: Well, that will exist in the future... not just epubs, though. 14:50:19 So... 14:50:32 Sparks, :) 14:50:55 whatever publican offers ... 14:50:55 Since I started working for the Product Security Team at Red Hat, I've been working on liberating a number of documents and articles that have been written. 14:51:07 I hope to publish the first later this week. 14:51:11 Sparks, ++ 14:51:56 So I'll be writing to the list and on my blog about this more but I hope this will be the start to putting many good guides into the FOSS world. 14:52:47 Sparks, it occurs to me that there might be more room on the docs.fp.o landing page for more than just formal guides 14:52:58 Yes 14:53:30 Articles, multi-media (included in DocBook), and other interesting things can be published there. 14:54:24 that is worthy of some effort, i think 14:55:00 it's easier to write an article than it is to write a guide, imo 14:55:15 randomuser`: Sure. 14:55:27 randomuser`: For smaller topics articles are appropriate. 14:55:41 randomuser`: I believe the readme-burning-isos is an article. 14:55:50 I'm exited to see what you come up with, Sparks 14:56:17 randomuser`: Yeah, me too. :) 14:56:36 jbrooks, suehle and others are working on bringing up fedoramagazine.org in replacement of the FWN. It will be mostly articles and features. 14:56:42 a bunch of articles, though... i think our index would need more structure than divisions of release for that to scale 14:57:01 or, just publish on fedoramagazine :/ 14:57:06 :P 14:57:46 not sure on a timeline though, suehle is trying to sort out who pays for the SSL cert 14:58:06 iambryan: Wha? I thought that would come through Infra 14:59:00 it's a wordpress.com hosted install 14:59:13 Oh, well then SSL won't work 14:59:29 We could always host it somewhere else :-p 14:59:40 jsmith: And make SSL work? 14:59:48 Sparks: Sure, why not? 14:59:58 it'll be using third party SSL I believe, it's just trying to find the bucket to take the payment from 15:00:19 iambryan: AFAIK, you can't make SSL work on wp.c 15:00:31 unless they've made some major changes to their setup 15:00:54 is wp.c providing sponsored hosting? 15:01:40 purchased hosting is my understanding... the $99 package I believe 15:02:02 * adamw taps feet, looks at watch 15:02:18 yes, we should wrap it up here 15:02:31 afterparty in #fedora-docs 15:02:43 #endmeeting