==================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==================================


Meeting started by adamw at 15:02:28 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-07-22/fedora-qa.2013-07-22-15.02.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call  (adamw, 15:02:31)

* Fedora 20 Change review  (adamw, 15:07:06)
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5 needs to be integrated
    smoothly with KDE 4.11 and GNOME 3.10 at least  (adamw, 15:20:30)
  * btrfs-by-default appears to be off the table again for F20  (adamw,
    15:21:12)
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AppInstaller may result in us
    using two depsolvers in official packaging tools  (adamw, 15:22:07)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud would have
    obvious deliverable and criteria consequences  (adamw, 15:25:33)
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud will likely
    require changes to criteria and extra validation testing  (adamw,
    15:29:46)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSD_cache looks pretty
    vague but could be significant if accepted, I guess  (adamw,
    15:31:43)
  * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSD_cache may result in
    anaconda changes and changes to configuration of deployed systems
    with SSDs  (adamw, 15:35:34)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
    replaces the login manager for KDE (one of the release-blocking
    desktops)  (adamw, 15:36:02)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InstallerLVMThinProvisioningSupport
    is a semi-large change to partitioning in the installer - yay
    (adamw, 15:36:56)
  * GNOME 3.10 is ported to Bluez5 and won't work with Bluez4, but KDE's
    libbluedevil is not yet ported to Bluez5 and may not be for a month:
    we would like FESCo to take a hand in dealing with that issue
    (adamw, 15:42:00)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plasma-nm is another
    KDE change; looks like there's quite a bit of KDE churn for F20, we
    should probably test it a bit harder than usual  (adamw, 15:43:10)
  * we can look into the question of which Changes we should try and
    'validate' once FESCo finishes approving them  (adamw, 15:46:24)

* open floor  (adamw, 15:48:54)
  * LINK:
    http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-quality-tasks.html
    , tape it to your fridge  (adamw, 15:49:34)
  * first F20 blocker review meeting is scheduled for this Wednesday
    (07-24): may happen or not depending on how many blockers are
    proposed  (adamw, 15:53:58)

Meeting ended at 16:00:18 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (85)
* kparal (24)
* Martix (17)
* tflink (12)
* brunowolff (6)
* drago01_ (5)
* nirik (4)
* zodbot (3)
* satellit_e (2)
* jskladan1 (1)
* robatino (1)
* pschindl (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot