14:00:38 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:00:38 Meeting started Mon Sep 2 14:00:38 2013 UTC. The chair is randomuser`. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:39 #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:00:39 #topic Roll Call 14:00:42 * lnovich here 14:00:47 * Capesteve here 14:00:53 * dayparke here 14:01:50 hello 14:02:06 dayparke, thanks for staying up! 14:02:25 * jjmcd 14:02:29 hi randomuser`! burning the midnight oil tonight ;) 14:02:43 maybe since there isn't much in terms of attendance today we can end early and let dayparke go to sleep? 14:03:16 it's labor day in the US; some might be doing the three day weekend holiday thing 14:03:41 Holiday? What's that? 14:03:43 * pkovar is here 14:04:09 TIme to put the "u" back into labour 14:04:13 jjmcd, usually that thing that people tell you about directly after saying "oh, you're actually working today?" 14:05:18 * jjmcd has another meeting tonight, only US folks too, 14:05:28 sooo workaholics 14:05:56 #topic follow up on action items 14:06:12 #info randomuser has announced open beats and change tickets 14:06:34 #Topic Release Note Beats 14:06:50 #info Beats are open for writers of all kinds 14:07:05 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats?rd=Docs/Beats 14:07:37 #link http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-docs-tasks.html 14:08:08 there's a "notify development about alpha RNs" on this schedule 14:08:17 jjmcd, do you recall the context of that? 14:08:38 Usually we collaborate with marketing on alpha RNs 14:08:49 But we need to notify dev so 14:09:00 they get their stuff into the change list 14:09:42 * randomuser` wonders if the mail he recently sent to devel-announce will count 14:10:01 Feature pages, that's the word I was looking for 14:10:04 not if the audience is in the US and has been on vacation 14:10:22 jjmcd, no, it's Changes now, not Features :) 14:10:46 OK, so we need to update the beat writing page 14:10:56 and we've passed the change freeze 14:11:09 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_workflow_-_beat_writing 14:11:28 So in principle, we know that the major changes are 14:11:38 * randomuser` nods 14:11:39 Of course, 90% of the changes don't show there 14:11:47 i can do that today 14:12:10 some follow up would be nice, in case I miss something 14:12:52 jjmcd, will you be able to grab the radio beat again? 14:12:57 yes 14:13:17 I had hoped to pawn that of on Eric, but he seems quiet lately WRT docs stuff 14:13:20 can someone explain to me what is the fedora for specific audiences section? 14:13:48 lnovich, there are lots of packages of limited interest 14:14:06 Things like biology, chemistry, nuclear physics, electronics, etc 14:14:18 ok 14:14:30 * LoKoMurdoK here 14:14:37 There are probably two dozen packages only interesting to folks who happen to have particle accelerators 14:14:52 * gomix lurks... 14:14:57 Not a lot of those folks, but important to those few 14:15:53 I'm curious, when are the beats written? End of development, or throughout? 14:16:02 #action randomuser to update beats SOP 14:16:21 dayparke, we've been trying to start as early as possible 14:16:32 dayparke, as soon as the info is available, ideally; realistically it happens as soon as someone gets around to it 14:16:37 starting last week 14:17:25 cool, i'll try one for F20 14:17:35 nice, thank you! 14:17:48 should we be nervous of all the absent developer PoCs? 14:18:22 lnovich, the community writers have never really had the same kind of developer relationship that you might be used to 14:18:30 in my experience, anyway 14:18:51 Yeah, it is pretty uneven 14:18:57 ok - maybe I can help change that 14:19:10 #info If you're curious about taking a beat and not sure how to go about it, ask! #fedora-docs or docs@lists.fp.o 14:20:29 everyone I've cornered on IRC was happy to answer questions, but theres no process or requirement for participation for packagers so they often don't 14:20:51 Let's move on to the other side of this coin, the Change process 14:21:38 #topic documenting Changes 14:21:42 We're trying out a tracker bug SOP for documenting Changes 14:22:19 #info there is a RN bug and guide updating bug for each Change 14:22:27 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2013-August/015211.html 14:22:55 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-August/001238.html 14:23:26 I've created bugs for all of the system wide changes so far, and will do the others soon. 14:23:38 So far, one set of bugs has been picked up, by Sparks 14:24:52 #info if you are taking a beat, please also take the related Change tickets 14:25:30 are there any questions on this process? there wasn't a lot of discussion when the idea first came out 14:26:46 hrm 14:27:25 #topic Guide Status 14:27:57 #info if you have a guide that clearly covers the content of a Change in F20, please take the docs-request Change ticket 14:28:13 will do 14:28:26 for example, Sparks took assignment of an SELinux ticket, because he covers the security guide 14:29:12 anyway, do we have goals for guides in F20? projected needs for contributions, or areas for new writers to assist? 14:31:27 do we have any new writers present? 14:32:30 i don't believe so 14:33:07 lnovich, people write introductions on the docs list fairly regularly, but historically this isn't an easy group to drop into 14:35:02 I plan to make a pitch at the tech writing conf. in Israel but that won't be until Feb or Mar 2014 14:36:59 sounds interesting, lnovich, you'll have to let us know if your talk is broadcast 14:37:19 right now looking for a topic to pitch 14:37:31 thinking about - how to write for localization 14:37:51 but need to make sure it will be a topic that will appeal to all tech writers 14:38:17 even those who still use (gasp) MS word for their docs 14:38:23 eeewwww 14:38:26 lol 14:39:21 you would be suprised how many companies STILL use it 14:39:43 so, nothing really to say for guides? 14:39:56 my guide is slowly taking shape 14:40:12 and should be out of draft mode just before GA 14:40:13 lnovich, just as many people think excell is a database :P 14:40:48 lnovich, that's right, you were going to start in dept or oct 14:40:55 *sept 14:41:04 that is the plan 14:41:25 I will begin writing for this guide end of Sept. 14:41:58 great, looking forward to it 14:42:02 and should finish (i hope) just before (but may be after) LinuxConn Europe 14:42:49 #topic Outstanding BZ Tickets 14:42:56 #link http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 14:44:20 there's one in here about discontinuing the translation quick start guide; l10n doesn't use it because the wiki is accessible and the alternative is not 14:45:24 not really our issue, but interesting 14:47:02 * randomuser` gives everyone a moment to look over the open bugs 14:47:31 * lnovich runs to get the flyswatter 14:47:32 so many bugs :P 14:47:49 too many assigned to me :-( 14:48:21 yes, as it is now, the l10n quick start guide only confuses people 14:48:27 lnovich, but.. you asked for them 14:48:36 +1 for removing it 14:48:37 i know i did 14:49:16 lnovich, i wonder if the virtualization-guide bugs could just be closed, as that guide is no longer published? 14:49:21 pkovar, there was some discussion on trans@ about it as well 14:49:39 the guide was broken up into other guides 14:49:45 so the bug may still exist 14:49:55 ah i see 14:49:56 * pkovar has to read it again 14:49:59 or it may have already been fixed due to other fixes 14:50:23 so i need to look at each one and kill them one at a time 14:50:25 pkovar, i was thinking that if they came to a consensus that they would either ask for action or shaiton or someone would just do it 14:50:45 yeah, i am not sure 14:52:48 can i ask - are we using publican 3.x to publish docs now? (sorry, off topic) 14:52:55 nope 14:53:01 ok 14:53:22 Rudi will be able to fill you in 14:53:27 dayparke, there has been some progress in that effort; recent posts to the docs list from trac tickets should bring you up to speed 14:53:51 #topic Open Floor 14:54:24 cheers, will have a look randomuser`^^ 14:55:00 like i said before - I am planning a talk at the israel tech writers conference - if there is a topic you think will be interesting - give me a shout 14:55:37 lnovich, enabling community involvement in open source documentation 14:56:16 +1 14:57:15 that was another topic i was thinking of pitching - that and - "How to land that hi-tech job (via open source documentation)" 14:57:42 as there will be many noobs and tech writing students attending 14:57:46 i would attend that one :) 14:57:54 and getting them on board would be great 14:58:28 ideally I would like every tech writing school - to assign their writers to work on Fedora Docs as their final project 14:58:40 there are 4 schools here 14:58:52 who put out about 60 tech writers per yr 14:58:54 I would like to have something for such writers to do in Fedora Docs, at some point 14:59:45 tflink: heey! 15:00:03 we had a good talk at the office about writing procedures well - it was useful 15:00:12 okay, we'd better wrap it up before the QA folks get aggressive 15:00:16 #endmeeting