#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-01)

Meeting summary

1. init process (mmaslano, 12:02:38)
   
2. Open Questions - Playground: Signing (mmaslano, 12:04:12)
   
3. Open Questions - Playground: Provenpackagers (mmaslano, 12:06:52)
   1. AGREED: let's have comaintainers and provenpackagers in Playground repo (+5,-0,0) (mmaslano, 12:15:43)
   
   
4. Open Questions - distinguish packages (mmaslano, 12:16:12)
   1. AGREED: don't distinguish packages from Fedora and Playground (+5,-0,0) (mmaslano, 12:20:21)
   
   
5. Open Questions - Playground: reviews (mmaslano, 12:20:52)
   
6. subtopic Are conflicts inside Playground repository allowed? (mmaslano, 12:21:08)
   
7. 1 Big repo vs multiple small ones (mmaslano, 12:26:53)
   1. AGREED: We will provide a kind of "non-blocking review service" and later we will talk about whether we should make it mandatory or not. Coprs won't be blocked by reviews results in the beginning. (+5,-0,0) (hhorak, 13:24:04)
   2. AGREED: Playground will be a collection of selected COPRs. (+5,-0,0) (hhorak, 13:24:56)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Changes_Drafts/Playground_repository (mmaslano, 13:25:11)
   4. ACTION: review Change proposal - Playground repository (mmaslano, 13:28:33)
   5. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Changes_Drafts/SCL (mmaslano, 13:29:07)

Action items

1. review Change proposal - Playground repository

People present (lines said)

1. mmaslano (90)
2. juhp_ (74)
3. tjanez (73)
4. hhorak (28)
5. jreznik (27)
6. bkabrda1 (25)
7. zodbot (4)
8. bkabrda (3)
9. drieden (2)
10. samkottler (1)
11. abadger1999 (0)
12. juhp (0)
13. pkovar (0)