14:00:10 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:00:10 Meeting started Mon Apr 7 14:00:10 2014 UTC. The chair is randomuser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:10 #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:00:11 #topic Roll Call 14:00:22 * Capesteve waves 14:00:25 * jreznik is around if needed 14:00:31 * sclark is here 14:00:34 * pkovar is here 14:00:46 * jhradilek is here 14:01:02 * Sparks 14:01:55 * randomuser is also here 14:02:08 * jjmcd 14:03:54 that's a good start, welcome 14:04:08 #topic New Writers 14:04:18 (we'll do action item inline) 14:04:21 * anarang is here. just joined fedora-qa, this is my first meeting. 14:04:34 Any new writers here? 14:05:06 cmurf, if there's *any* way I can trick^W convince you to write for us... 14:05:28 sclark, how are you settling in? 14:06:20 randomuser: Since I did the docdirs thing $DAYJOB has been hectic. I intend to get my head around beats this week. 14:06:40 sclark, cool 14:06:56 #action to actually apply sclark's patches 14:06:59 :) 14:07:03 #undo 14:07:03 Removing item from minutes: ACTION by randomuser at 14:06:56 : to actually apply sclark's patches 14:07:06 :-) 14:07:10 #action randomuser to actually apply sclark's patches 14:07:38 sclark, i also need to send out an overview on covering beats; though it's mostly "read stuff about random packages and take notes" 14:08:13 randomuser, I think I saw a couple of links from last weeks meeting or the FAD 14:08:31 You're welcome to reach out to me personally, or anyone really 14:08:50 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_mentors 14:09:10 randomuser, Great. Let's see how I get on the the stuff in the wiki this week. 14:09:46 sounds good 14:09:57 #topic Changes & Release Notes 14:10:13 * pbokoc is here :) 14:10:21 #action randomuser to send mail to docs list about RNs process 14:10:47 I'm thinking of also mailing various SIGs to ask for participation, especially while we're still in the wiki whiteboard stage 14:11:02 thoughts? 14:11:56 o/ 14:12:17 Perhaps a message to announce@ when the beats are open would help? 14:12:29 * randomuser is hoping for responses like "that's a good idea, I'll do that too" 14:12:53 Sparks, i think the only thing keeping the beats from being officially open is the lack of an announcement 14:13:06 #info randomuser to send beats open announcement to announce@ 14:13:17 #undo 14:13:17 Removing item from minutes: INFO by randomuser at 14:13:06 : randomuser to send beats open announcement to announce@ 14:13:24 #action randomuser to send beats open announcement to announce@ 14:13:48 jsmith or jreznik could perhaps approve it 14:14:06 probably this afternoon, ie in 4-6hrs 14:14:35 in the meantime, we have this great change summary from this morning to work over 14:15:06 one of the changes is Rails4.1 - pkovar, was Ruby/Rails what the SCL is being built for? 14:15:37 randomuser: I can approve it on announce/devel-announce 14:15:53 (if nobody else would do it meanwhile) 14:16:08 jreznik, thanks :) I'll try and draft it soon enough that you won't be kept up late, wondering 14:17:57 there's also a change on Cloud kernel packaging, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Kernel_Packaging_for_Cloud 14:18:00 randomuser: there is a ruby SCL out there, yes, still not officially approved by the FPC, though 14:18:04 * lnovich is here! 14:18:49 also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collections 14:19:40 workstation but not server, eh? that's interesting 14:19:44 * zoglesby is here 14:19:53 not yet ? 14:20:43 maybe we should revisit SCLs after the FPC decision 14:20:48 has the dust finally settled on this yet? 14:20:54 there is a draft to enable SCLs across all fedora products/spins, though: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Changes_Drafts/SCL 14:21:40 is someone making a matrix as to which software packages are available for which fedora version/type? 14:22:23 * jsmith is late to the show 14:22:38 lnovich, the WGs will have kickstarts, at least 14:23:02 many of the changes will be processed as Changes, so that help 14:23:05 question of semantics - the workstation/cloud/server are being called what Fedora versions /distros/types? 14:23:30 Products 14:24:05 hmm.. I'll just do this 14:24:09 yes but if i am looking for a particular package and i have one fedora product and need to know if A is it in mine or elsewhere what document will tell me? 14:24:39 lnovich, the kickstart, or the document you produce from the kickstart 14:24:45 ok 14:25:00 guess i need to take a look at the kickstart 14:26:55 i see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Technical_Specification#Package_list 14:27:15 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Technical_Specification#Package_list 14:27:25 ok thanks! 14:27:28 but the actual ks will be the most reliable 14:29:05 randomuser: i hear there will be a separate "product" for kde? 14:29:32 pkovar, there's some contention about overlap, as I understand it, but the motivation is there 14:29:32 the package list for workstation is gnome, essentially 14:29:34 btw. kickstarts are still not yet done for products 14:29:48 pkovar, GNOME+devassist :) 14:29:54 right :-) 14:30:06 so, everyone please take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet 14:30:27 i think it will be too time consuming to go through them line by line in the meeting 14:30:43 in case you'd need any help with it, let me know 14:31:10 #info Changes need docs contacts! please look them over for items of interest, and add yourself as RNs contact/ BZ Docs Contact 14:31:12 and yes, as always - there's spike of submitted changes... going to dig into it for this week 14:32:50 While we're here, jsmith do you have news from the CloudWG? 14:33:02 or server wg news from zoglesby ? 14:33:13 randomuser: Nothing new this week 14:33:22 randomuser: Nothing so far... I've brought up Docs stuff a couple of times, but nobody seems interested other than saying "documentation would be nice... but we're too busy to think about it" 14:33:36 * randomuser got the desktop folks' attention, but not in a docs way 14:33:47 jsmith, ack; i see they have a big todo list 14:34:50 #topic Guide Status 14:35:38 well, for WGs - pretty much every WG is now about to submit theirs change proposals with product specific changes - very good starting point for you guys 14:36:21 jreznik, yeah, the Changes process is a big help for us, your work is appreciated :) 14:37:02 in the end, I was able to push WGs to work on Changes :) 14:37:35 for server - that Roles changes would need documentation (but nothing is implemented so far) 14:38:11 jreznik: I have the shell of a guide, but I am waiting for something to work with to start writing 14:38:19 on guides - i know i've brought this up before, but not since our talk at the FAD regarding community participation 14:38:55 how do we feel about soliciting review of drafts from, say, users@ or fedoraforum.org or $regional_community_hub 14:39:33 its a great idea 14:39:42 will reviewers get badges 14:39:55 sure, why not 14:40:22 someone will have to draft a badge proposal, and i think the badges would have to be manually awarded 14:41:42 Ok, I'll do that then 14:41:51 the ask for review part, anyway 14:43:36 lnovich, what's the status of your guide, anyway? 14:44:11 ready for a draft to be published? 14:44:20 its ready 14:44:31 making some changes at the moment 14:44:43 but it at this point it is more stable 14:44:52 and major changes have been made 14:45:14 would you like me to publish a draft for you? 14:45:50 also, anything else on Guides? 14:47:19 randomuser - right now i am getting ready to push - once that is done feel free 14:47:33 sure 14:48:59 just as an FYI - if anyone is looking for me next week - I am unplugged and will not be holding office hours for the next 2 weeks 14:49:08 booo! 14:49:13 :) 14:49:27 finally taking some family staycation 14:49:30 #topic Open Floor Discussion 14:50:28 nb did you get my email w/the receipt? 14:54:15 crickets... 14:54:36 lnovich, i believe nb is usually working this time of day 14:54:44 ok 14:54:45 afk working 14:54:53 randomuser: Release notes need restructured, thats all I have. 14:55:11 * randomuser groans 14:55:25 lnovich, i got your email 14:55:26 you can't lob a bomb like that and just stop, zoglesby ! 14:55:38 randomuser: I believe he just did. 14:55:39 thanks nb 14:56:01 * sclark has to leave for next meeting 14:56:17 randomuser: We just need a spot for the Products a new section 14:56:24 i agree, though - some things are strange 14:56:31 like Networking under Desktop 14:56:45 randomuser: yes, some other parts need to be moved 14:57:01 And I still don't know where to put all of the big data stuff 14:57:18 zoglesby, that seems like developer facing content 14:57:38 i don't know of much in that space that is useful ootb 14:58:35 Anyway, I just wanted to make it known on the record, we can talk about it later. 14:58:47 sure 14:59:08 zoglesby, an office hours project? 14:59:16 randomuser: sure, sounds good to me 14:59:44 #action zoglesby and randomuser to reorganize beats during next office hours, participants welcome 15:00:01 and that's all our time for today, thanks for coming everyone 15:00:07 #endmeeting