15:13:40 #startmeeting kde-sig 15:13:40 Meeting started Tue Aug 5 15:13:40 2014 UTC. The chair is rdieter. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:13:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:13:45 #meetingname kde-sig 15:13:45 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:13:48 #topic roll call 15:13:54 hi 15:13:58 Hi 15:13:59 I am heah 15:14:01 hi, kde-sig meeting , who's around today? 15:14:09 estoy aqui 15:14:16 ans so on and so on 15:14:26 present 15:14:31 dvratil: ping 15:14:37 metoo 15:14:41 sorry, I'm here 15:15:47 #info rdieter mbriza jgrulich danofsatx-work than pino|work dvratil present 15:15:57 #chair mbriza jgrulich danofsatx-work than pino|work dvratil 15:15:57 Current chairs: danofsatx-work dvratil jgrulich mbriza pino|work rdieter than 15:16:15 hi 15:16:27 #info tosky present 15:16:29 hi 15:16:31 #chair tosky 15:16:31 Current chairs: danofsatx-work dvratil jgrulich mbriza pino|work rdieter than tosky 15:16:40 alrighty... 15:16:42 #topic agenda 15:16:45 what to discuss today? 15:17:13 * rdieter has kde-4.13.97 status, formalize danofsatx-work as kde WG member 15:17:28 probably the qt5 inclusion 15:17:39 * danofsatx-work checks email real quick like 15:18:32 nope, no agenda in fedora-kde@fp.o 15:18:52 speaking of which, is there a super-secret ML I'm supposed to sub to now as a formal WG member? 15:19:13 danofsatx-work: no, kde@lists.fpo is where the action is (and irc) 15:19:48 ok....that's where I waste most of my time anyhow ;) 15:20:41 #topic kde-4.13.97 status 15:21:05 alrighty, got started on importing kde-4.13.97 bits into rawhide last night, am through most of the core packages now 15:21:08 siddharth yes. well, not with nodebug. see builds at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=image&order=-id 15:21:08 but note that they arent working right now -- there's a problem that should be fixed soon 15:21:14 will spam the rest here shortly 15:21:27 mattdm: wrong channel? 15:21:43 (or responding to old query?) 15:22:33 noticed there was no kactivities tarball, assuming that was on purpose... so am removing any versioned dependencies I see about it 15:22:53 rdieter wrong channel. very very laggy net on the train :) 15:22:53 sorry :) 15:23:11 np 15:23:14 sorry! 15:23:58 mattdm: as penance, you must be extra super awesome @ flock (and not just the usual normal level of awesome) 15:24:30 any questions/comments about 4.13.97 ? 15:24:53 only for rawhide? 15:26:19 danofsatx-work: good question. rawhide first for now, then will move on to f21 builds 15:26:34 rdieter: (since he's laggy, he'll reply when flock is already over ;) ) 15:27:07 any preference for how fast/soon to push for 4.13.97 in f21? right away? wait a bit? 15:27:19 ok. I'm testing the F21 builds as they come out. So far, KDE is the only one working properly ;) 15:28:11 danofsatx-work: only one what? only spin/desktop ? 15:28:20 yes 15:28:35 yay?!? 15:28:36 Workstation doesn't work. KDE does. 15:28:37 :) 15:28:48 down with GNOME! 15:29:01 danofsatx-work: meh, we don't need talk like that. 15:29:24 or are you channeling Kevin since hes not here? 15:29:37 that was with tongue firmly in cheek ;) 15:29:42 rdieter: hehe :) 15:30:08 still, we can and should be better than that, even in jest. 15:31:08 ok, then.....Way to go team! We have the first working blocking desktop for Fedora Twenty One! 15:31:11 we want our community to be positive and welcoming 15:31:22 there we go! 15:31:36 moving on... 15:31:48 #topic formalize danofsatx-work as KDE WG member 15:32:20 we'd discussed this on irc and onlist over the past... well... awhile, and it's time to formalize it. 15:34:05 bleh, having trouble finding the wiki page about current members 15:34:46 please refer to kkofler's proposal onlist, if you recall. any questions or comments before we vote? 15:35:11 iirc didn't kevin update the membership list last week? 15:35:29 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/2014-June/013631.html 15:35:33 he did, but I can't find that page 15:35:33 oh, maybe 15:35:34 here is the wiki page, already updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Plasma_Product_Governance 15:35:43 oh goodie, well, nevermind then 15:36:01 oh, there it is - thanks jgrulich 15:36:06 moving on... 15:36:27 #topic qt5 packages on kde spin 15:36:44 mbriza mentioned in #fedora-kde earlier that sddm recently dropped support for qt4... 15:36:57 it did? I missed that 15:37:08 so, what does that mean for us? 15:37:48 and, given that the workstation/desktop group intends to include qt5 runtime packages ... it would be more than a little ironic if we (kde spin) didn't do the same 15:38:30 out of curiosity, why do they include qt5? what they need it for? 15:39:05 pino|work: so it is part of the default installed runtime 15:39:20 pino|work, because even they think Qt is cool :-) 15:39:34 so nothing actually using it? 15:39:37 ie, so it is considered part of the workstation platform 15:40:07 users/isv's etc... can expect it to be present without any extra work 15:40:10 given that various projects are switching to Qt, it makes lot of sense - at some point they will have some basic application depending on Qt 15:40:19 interesting 15:40:42 (some) people never finish to surprise me 15:40:44 Kevin thinks including qt5 like that is silly... fwiw 15:40:56 m( 15:41:15 and on some level, he's right, but I still think it a good worthwhile move we should adopt too 15:41:22 ehm, how should Qt be included to be included in the non-silly way? 15:41:32 I mean, if it's included it's included... 15:41:48 i guess it's silly because nothing depends on it 15:41:52 tosky: non silly would be to include some applications that actually use it, rather than just the libraries/runtime support only 15:42:16 oh, but that's the first step 15:42:30 15:42:43 better something than nothing at all, especially if the idea comes from their side and not from us 15:42:52 in our case, we would (probably) have at least one thing using Qt5 now: sddm 15:43:08 ("those pushy kde packagers want to push qt5 even if not used" etc) 15:43:35 pino|work: I'm not sure where the idea originated honestly, but I've been pushing for it regardless 15:43:37 well, we can switch other apps and non-KDE libraries too after this 15:43:47 (as well as for kde-runtime too) 15:45:18 anyway, mbriza, do you anticipate any issues switching sddm over to Qt5 for our purpose(s)? 15:45:49 i don't, really 15:45:58 it's the same program, basically 15:46:14 ok, I assumed so, but was asking just in case 15:46:15 there was only a problem with intel drivers and qt5 (?) but it seems to be fixed 15:47:34 i just don't understand why they pushed so hard to remove qt4 support, i don't think it was causing any problems 15:48:02 somebody apparently thought it worthwhile 15:48:05 you can use C++11 awesomeness 15:48:14 * dvratil can't wait to kill Qt 4 in Akonadi 15:48:26 dvratil: what C++11 awesomeness you can't use with qt4? 15:48:49 oh well, at least we'll be able to run the new awesome Plasma5 SDDM theme 15:48:50 list initializers, function pointers in slots, lambda functions... 15:49:16 list initializers and lambda functions were just fine 15:49:29 not with Qt containers 15:49:48 of course its now +1 better too 15:50:13 Is there any difference in writing themes for SDDM on qt5? 15:50:42 danofsatx-work: yes, qtquick 2.0 is a bit richer 15:50:57 dvratil: oh, yeah 15:51:05 also you can now import some Plasma 5 modules to get battery information, etc. 15:51:06 i guess i ran into that too 15:53:08 ok, I'll take the task of getting a good default set of qt5 packages included on kde spin (to essentially match what workstation intends to include too) 15:53:28 (cough) and what sddm requires too [: 15:53:30 mbriza: and feel free to switch sddm over to Qt5 at your convenience 15:54:01 mbriza: I assume sddm will include the proper dependencies to pull in what it needs without any help :) 15:54:23 yeah, yeah :) 15:54:31 mbriza: but when you get a chance, do let me know it's specific requirements so that I can verify it is met 15:55:17 it's qt5-qttools, qt5-qtquick, qt5-qtbase-gui, i think 15:55:33 #action rdieter to implement getting a good default set of qt5 packages included on kde spin 15:55:50 #action mbriza to switch sddm over to Qt5 15:55:57 oh, qtquick is not a separate package, so qt5-qtdeclarative? well, i'll take a look when i'm switching sddm 15:56:26 theres a qt5-qtquick1 and qt5-qtdeclarative, yeah. not confusing at all. :-/ 15:57:05 anything else on the topic? 15:58:06 moving on... 15:58:10 #topic open discussion 15:58:23 anything else to discuss today? else, we're about out of time anyway 15:58:37 is anybody here coming to flock, btw? 15:58:56 not I (unfortunately) 15:59:05 I created the kde-runtime update for F20 with split packages, so please try it and ++karma it, so we can have smooth Plasma 5 installation soon :) 16:00:23 dvratil: thanks 16:01:22 * rdieter will end meeting in 2min 16:04:55 thanks all! 16:04:57 #endmeeting