06:01:31 #startmeeting i18n 06:01:31 Meeting started Wed Oct 1 06:01:31 2014 UTC. The chair is tagoh_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 06:01:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 06:01:31 #meetingname i18n 06:01:31 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 06:01:32 #topic agenda and roll call 06:01:33 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2014-10-01 06:01:37 Hi! 06:01:57 shall we have i18n meeting 06:03:04 hi 06:03:27 ପଗ 06:03:34 hi 06:04:00 hi 06:04:59 hi 06:05:38 okay, let's get started. 06:05:52 #topic Upcoming schedule 06:05:52 #info 2014-10-14 Software Translation Deadline 06:05:52 #info 2014-10-14 Beta Change Deadline 06:05:53 #info 2014-10-14 Accepted Changes 100% Complete 06:05:53 #info 2014-10-28 Beta Release 06:07:11 2 weeks for upcoming events. apparently no blockers/fe bugs in i18n for beta though 06:09:11 anything else we want to talk about the schedule related? 06:11:18 okay, let's move on then. 06:11:22 #topic Outstanding topics 06:11:23 #info #31: Fedora 21 i18n docbeats (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:11:23 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/31 06:11:32 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat 06:12:17 I added i18n to 06:12:20 .bug 1038413 06:12:23 juhp: Bug 1038413 fedup stage2 keymap will always be US again for F20-F21 due to anaconda not writing vconsole.keymap kernel parameter any more (#1035316) - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1038413 06:13:44 aha 06:15:48 does it only affect upgrading? 06:18:03 for relnotes, that looks good to me. if no topics to add particularly and ready to go, I'll pass it to the docs team. 06:19:15 tagoh_, yes I think upgrades 06:20:34 I see 06:20:52 any comments on relnotes? 06:20:59 tagoh_, it looks okay to me - though wish there was more to say - I just made a few tweaks to Input Methods 06:21:16 tagoh_: i am building google-noto-fonts mostly today, it has new 50+ packages 06:21:29 subpackages I guess 06:21:42 pravins: do we want to add something for that in relnotes? 06:21:46 yes, subpackages 06:22:11 pravins, does that include CJK btw? 06:22:54 pravins, anyway sounds great - go for it! 06:23:30 juhp: no 06:23:35 ah 06:23:48 tagoh_: yes, i think good to have it in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat 06:24:37 pravins: okay. so postpone the discussion to next week then. 06:25:06 tagoh_: thanks, i will do the needful mostly today or coming Monday 06:25:24 pravins: thanks 06:26:33 #info #33: Keep watching MozTrap related discussion (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:26:33 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/33 06:26:47 no updates on this topic I guess? 06:27:31 #topic Outstanding task 06:27:32 #info #32: Fedora 21 i18n test day (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:27:32 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/32 06:28:02 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2014-09-02_i18n 06:29:43 still want to see more feedback on it from our team though, I'd encourage you all to do some testing on f21. 06:32:09 tagoh_: i see, some of the issues list "Nice to test" are already fixed 06:32:29 i will update https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2014-09-02_i18n "Nice to test" and remove those issues 06:32:38 s/list/listed 06:33:42 pravins: right. we may need to clean up them too though, particularly if we are confident it won't be regressed again 06:34:01 should I open a ticket for merging Printing and Rendering? 06:34:13 or removing Printing probably 06:34:38 tagoh_: agree, i think if those issues are fixed in upstream we can definitely do it. 06:34:43 I guess less (redundant) tests would probably encourage more testing perhaps 06:34:49 juhp: just adding a comment on the ticket for feedback. we'll review the result later and we can discuss how to improve it next time. 06:35:12 okay just don't want to forget about it before F22 :) 06:35:22 let me add a comment then 06:35:34 juhp: thanks 06:36:19 though I am almost tempted to merge the results and just remove it now but better I guess 06:36:25 better not 06:36:53 juhp: hm, yes. let's do it for f22 06:37:03 yes 06:37:44 pravins: +1 06:38:26 anything else for test day? 06:39:52 if not, let's move on 06:39:55 done 06:40:10 #topic New topic 06:40:10 #info #34: need Fedora i18n Mission Statement (petersen) 06:40:10 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/34 06:40:26 okay i filed this one 06:40:56 it occurred to me earlier this week that the Fedora i18n Project doesn't have a Mission Statement 06:41:05 probably good to have one? 06:42:00 have some for short term and long term say? 06:42:24 well do we list some goals on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N#The_Fedora_Internationalization_.28I18N.29_Project 06:43:01 anyway http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N could do with some love anyway I guess 06:43:15 tagoh_, yeah Mission should be long term 06:43:20 i think this is good time to do that. specifically when we have Cloud, server and Workstation group with nice mission statement 06:43:34 and Base 06:44:13 * pravins always miss Base , thanks juhp :) 06:45:40 like handwriting? 06:47:24 well, dunno if it can be figured out in the meeting. maybe good to move the discussion on the list? 06:48:24 tagoh_, no, it should be highlevel not low level shorter term specific goals 06:48:55 more to explain what we do, and why and what for etc 06:49:08 i think good to prepare some Draft and then send on mailing list for review (addition & deletion) 06:49:35 sounds good to me. 06:49:56 "The Mission of the Fedora i18n Project is to have fantastic international language OS support in Fedora" 06:50:09 or something like that - just a quick example 06:51:00 pravins, yeah - also good to gather ideas 06:51:16 but we could start from some draft 06:51:30 need some time to think about. let's move the dicsussion on the list. 06:51:37 it is quite important really for long term direction 06:51:42 okay 06:52:09 #action move the discussion of the mission statement for i18n to the list 06:52:20 #topic Open Floor 06:52:40 anything else wa want to discuss on this meeting? 06:55:52 tagoh_, do you want to discuss about the next meeting? 06:55:59 yep 06:56:09 was about to bring it up :) 06:57:37 I want to suggest to rotate the meeting chair from next week so that we'll see more activities here. any comments for that? 06:59:51 +1 06:59:54 if possible, good to rotate it with all of us though, dunno what order is better. 07:02:26 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136623 07:02:47 that could be good for proaction though maybe we can start with volunteers first? 07:03:11 juhp: sure. 07:03:21 that may be good start. 07:04:15 so who wants to chair next meeting? 07:07:58 or shall I nominate someone? :) 07:08:04 :) 07:08:25 pravins, are you volunteering? :) 07:08:40 juhp: tagoh_ yes sure :) 07:08:49 pravins: thanks 07:08:50 since i have done one already, good to start with me 07:09:00 #action parvins to chair next meeting 07:09:21 fujiwarat: you want to say more for that? 07:10:06 tagoh_: I'm thinking if that bug should be fixed in ibus or still wait for chromium. 07:10:14 we could also use the #chair command perhaps 07:10:21 for f21. 07:10:48 fujiwarat: me neither. though it won't happens on other IM. 07:11:29 ok. 07:12:05 anything else? 07:12:40 if not, will close the meeting shortly 07:13:22 -> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=351991 07:14:11 fujiwarat, so it might interesting how uim avoids the problem 07:14:45 juhp: I have already done the code review to avoid the problem. 07:14:50 ah cool 07:15:06 fujiwarat, so you have a patch? :) 07:15:08 However I'm basically thinking it would be a bug in crome. 07:15:13 I see 07:15:25 OK, will update fedora ibus today. 07:15:31 cool 07:15:56 will test it once it is available on testing 07:16:26 thx 07:16:49 okay, let's stop here then. 07:16:55 thanks everyone for the meeting! 07:16:58 #endmeeting