06:00:42 #startmeeting i18n 06:00:42 Meeting started Wed Oct 15 06:00:42 2014 UTC. The chair is mfabian. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 06:00:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 06:00:59 hi 06:01:31 hi 06:02:02 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2014-10-15 06:02:54 hi 06:03:51 I think epico and the guys in Pune are away today actually 06:04:35 #meetingname i18n 06:04:35 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 06:05:19 #topic Upcoming schedule 06:05:50 #info 2014-10-14 Software Translation Deadline 06:05:51 #info 2014-10-14 Beta Change Deadline 06:05:51 #info 2014-10-14 Accepted Changes 100% Complete 06:05:51 #info 2014-10-28 Beta Release 06:07:11 #topic Outstanding topics 06:07:36 I guess TC3 is out 06:08:06 I installed the TC3 netinst yesterday. 06:08:36 #topic Outstanding topics 06:09:05 #info #31: Fedora 21 i18n docbeats 06:09:12 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/31 06:09:45 Do we need to add anything or change in the Documentation I18n Beat page? 06:10:24 woah , noto fonts! 06:10:28 hmm 06:10:46 not sure if listing all the subpackages is really useful/meaningful 06:11:54 fujiwarat, just occurred to me - maybe too late, but maybe show-config would be a better name than read-config 06:12:44 juhp: ibus has read-cache and write-cache sub-commands, too. 06:13:19 fujiwarat, okay - yeah I dunno - somehow read makes me think import 06:13:29 show-config and show-cache ? 06:14:00 fujiwarat, yes that might be clearer 06:14:05 dconf command has read and write sub-commands. 06:14:09 true 06:14:15 so maybe it is okay 06:14:37 anyway just a smaller point 06:15:13 I might prefer show and set to read/write in general in this kind of context :) 06:15:30 but maybe it is a personal preference 06:16:13 anyway 06:16:42 for Noto I feel we should reduce the amount of info - anyway I guess it needs to go to git now? 06:16:47 tagoh_, ? 06:17:26 anyone know the git url? we should probably be looking at that now not the wiki page 06:17:57 The notice “Beat Closed on Wiki” on top of the wiki page means that it is pointless to edit that wiki page? 06:18:36 I think so 06:18:50 well at least changes will not be picked up 06:19:08 ! 06:19:20 Then it would really be nice to know the git URL ... 06:19:46 There was a bug filed on noto-fonts by pravin, we agreed to do a yum list invocation instead of the actual list 06:20:03 https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/release-notes.git/commit/?id=0d45ae8c505bb94fbcb9cf921ebfb8c8c67dcf25 06:20:31 randomuser, aha 06:20:36 good 06:20:37 thanks 06:20:40 feedback welcome :) 06:21:17 the summary page will give you repo URIs if you want to preview the whole document 06:21:28 thanks 06:22:45 I added https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/release-notes.git/tree/en-US/I18n.xml to our trac ticket 06:24:38 Thanks for working the beat, all, i18n always writes it well 06:25:18 * randomuser drifts off to allow the meeting to continue uninterrupted 06:26:39 #topic Fedora i18n Mission Statement 06:26:51 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/34 06:27:28 Do we have new ideas for our mission statement? 06:28:06 “To boldly fix bugs nobody fixed before” ... 06:29:19 : 06:29:20 ) 06:30:21 randomuser, thanks again for the timely comments here 06:30:46 hmm 06:31:03 mfabian, i18n bugs? :) 06:31:23 Yes! 06:34:32 we probably need more thought 06:35:37 I quite like also Ankit's suggestion "Enabling Fedora to speak your language" 06:35:48 simple at least :) 06:35:53 Yes, it is difficult to write something meaningful which doesn’t sound like a string of buzzwords ... 06:36:02 Ankit’s suggestion sounds great! 06:36:04 hehe yea 06:36:34 though "speak" is slightly ambiguous perhaps 06:37:02 I think it is OK, it is “obviously” meant metaphorically. 06:37:50 right 06:38:28 I wonder if Fedora l10n has one 06:39:04 “Enabling Fedora to speak, input, render, print, … your language” sounds weird. Just “speak” seems perfect. 06:40:44 ok 06:41:00 maybe more important is deciding if that is really the Mission statement we want 06:43:03 probably we need more time/discussion? 06:43:35 OK, let’s think more about it. But Ankit’s suggestion is really nice ... 06:43:43 I feel it would be good to have a aspect of quality in the Statement too 06:43:53 "speak well" say 06:44:42 ... just wanted to write the same as juhp. 06:45:20 “speak well”, “speak perfectly”, ... 06:46:12 yes variously variations possible :) 06:46:30 various 06:48:00 * juhp wishes his client would warn about grammatical errors before sending his irc msgs... 06:48:33 “Enabling Fedora to speak your language without grammatical errors.” 06:49:53 #topic Fedora 21 i18n test day 06:50:04 It is in the past already, but it never hurts to do some testing ... 06:51:22 mfabian, haha 06:52:03 (without grammatical errors) 06:54:26 okay - we should probably close after beta anyway I feel - not really sure if we will get any more test results at this point though 06:54:44 OK, next topic ... 06:54:50 was tagoh_ going to do some analysis I forget? 06:56:29 mfabian, anyway go ahead I think :) 06:56:58 #topic Review Gnome redesign plans for control-center Region and Language 06:57:13 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/36 06:57:24 #link https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/SystemSettings/RegionAndLanguage 06:58:10 I don't have any update... anyone else? 06:58:38 someone should discuss more with Rui I think 06:59:17 It says “Languages without regional variants can be selected directly from the language list. Languages with more than one region show an arrow for navigating to a sub-list.” <- I like that, it is similar to what we see in the welcome screen of Anaconda. 06:59:39 mfabian, okay - that sounds good yes 07:00:41 I assume they will stick with a single language panel - not the split panel like in Anaconda 07:01:02 I prefer the single panel UI 07:01:53 I like the split panel in Anaconda, but it doesn’t matter much as long as one can select the locales somehow. 07:03:29 #topic New Task: I18N wiki cleanup 07:03:42 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/35 07:03:55 #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N 07:09:31 Nothing new ... then next topic? 07:11:17 #topic Open Floor 07:11:55 any f21 bugs to worry about? 07:12:15 the password IM bug seems not good 07:13:18 I found that on Fedora 21, do_set_content_type() is never called. What could be the reason for that? 07:13:34 hmm 07:13:38 Rui says he thinks nothing should have changed. 07:15:08 do you have the bug#? 07:15:29 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151429 07:17:15 fujiwarat, any comments? 07:18:08 ibus is same between f21 and f20. 07:18:46 Yes, I have exactly the same ibus package both on f20 and f21. 07:18:55 But I see the problem only on f21. 07:19:07 So it must be Gnome? Or Gtk? 07:19:21 probably 07:19:42 I wonder if we shouldn't propose as a Beta blocker or exception 07:20:06 mfabian, ascii password is shown? 07:20:39 ascii password? 07:20:46 You mean when typing without an input method? 07:21:05 ah - I see the screenshot 07:22:48 okay I proposed as a Freeze Exception 07:24:15 When typing with a keyboard layout, one properly sees the bullets. 07:24:33 iiuc it only affect gnome-shell UI 07:24:37 affects 07:24:43 When typing with an input method, one sees the input while in preedit. When it is committed, one sees it as bullets. 07:24:53 I see 07:26:27 I’ll ask Rui again whether he has an idea. 07:26:39 That was the last topic … 07:26:40 okay thanks 07:26:45 Any more comments? 07:27:16 fedup --network 21 still does not work... 07:27:21 ah 07:27:51 Oh, that’s bad, I would like to update my laptop soon. 07:29:12 fujiwarat: Is there a bug about “fedup --network 21” not working? 07:30:05 mfabian: I'm not sure when the upgrade works in beta or alpha. It seems to failed to get the kernel. 07:30:41 fujiwarat, so it fails to boot into update process? 07:31:11 * juhp remembers hearing about fedup problems but I forget where 07:31:48 It seems failed to get the image before the actual upgrade starts. 07:31:50 ah I think it was the Workstation WG meeting but maybe something else 07:31:57 fujiwarat, I see 07:33:15 one is in the accepted blocker 07:33:22 .bug 1099299 07:33:25 tagoh_: Bug 1099299 fedup fails to upgrade f20 to rawhide - infinite loop when starting udev - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1099299 07:33:40 aha 07:33:54 tagoh_, thanks - maybe it was there 07:33:56 dunno if it was in the discussion you saw 07:34:42 seems assigned to systemd 07:38:04 Anything more? 07:38:07 fujiwarat, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099299#c7 07:38:13 seems to be a workaround 07:39:42 juhp: thx. I knew --initrepo option but I surprised that kernel URL :(. 07:40:15 Maybe I wait for the bug fix. 07:40:31 fujiwarat, I think it is a kind of known problem with fedup before GA 07:41:08 the mirrors point to F20 iirc so one gets old environment for the upgrade 07:41:21 ok, I see. 07:41:22 so I think that is why the url is needed 07:41:38 It can be any F21 mirror of course with images 07:42:21 which suggests that the problem will fix it self at GA bicbw 07:42:45 But not the systemd/udev problem. 07:42:47 it would be nice if fedup could be a bit smarter with the repo urls before final 07:43:37 I guess the important point in the workaround in comment#7 was “systemctl stop systemd-udevd systemd-udevd-control.socket systemd-udevd-kernel.socket” 07:44:05 guess so 07:44:27 mfabian, ah guess you're right 07:44:39 fujiwarat, so it probably won't help much sorry 07:44:47 Who wants to chair this meeting next week? 07:48:43 if we can't decide now we can try to find someone later offline I guess 07:50:02 OK. 07:50:09 Then I can probably end this meeting ... 07:50:53 Thanks to everyone! 07:51:01 #endmeeting