06:02:57 #startmeeting i18n 06:02:57 Meeting started Wed Oct 22 06:02:57 2014 UTC. The chair is tagoh_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 06:02:57 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 06:02:57 #meetingname i18n 06:02:57 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 06:02:57 #topic agenda and roll call 06:02:57 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2014-10-22 06:03:04 Hi! ☺ 06:03:06 shall we have i18n meeting 06:03:21 hi 06:03:44 hi 06:05:23 hi 06:05:31 I think parag and pravins are away. so let's get started then 06:05:58 #topic Upcoming schedule 06:05:58 #info 2014-10-28 Beta Release 06:05:58 #info 2014-11-18 Final Freeze (Former Final Change Deadline) 06:05:58 #info 2014-12-02 Fedora 21 Final Release 06:06:58 still on the beta freeze though, is there anything we may want to discuss about bugs ? 06:07:11 just wonder if we should have a separate topic for bugs though 06:09:28 nope? 06:09:51 I think it is good to discuss bugs. 06:10:45 yes, if there are any bugs you guys mind 06:13:45 maybe better move on then? I suppose all of you spent some time for testing though, nice to keep testing up. 06:14:45 #topic Outstanding topics 06:14:46 #info #31: Fedora 21 i18n docbeats (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:14:46 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/31 06:16:55 I think we could close this ticket so that the wiki is closed and we need to send a request to apply any changes to git. 06:17:10 if there are any 06:18:05 #info #34: need Fedora i18n Mission Statement (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:18:05 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/34 06:18:19 any updates? 06:19:48 if not, let's move on next. 06:20:20 #info #36: review gnome redesign plans for control-center Region and Languages (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:20:20 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/36 06:20:37 Constantly improve i18n user experiences, such as input method and fonts rendering. 06:22:00 hi 06:22:52 for the previous topic. 06:24:36 epico, I added the suggestion to the trac ticket 06:24:44 juhp, thanks 06:25:02 juhp, epico: thanks 06:25:49 let me try to talk to desktop about control-center - the plans are not clear to me yet 06:26:36 juhp: sure thanks 06:26:45 #action juhp to ask Desktop about control-center Region and Languages redesign plans 06:27:02 so maybe good to discuss this on the list first what's better plan? 06:28:36 tagoh_, right - since they will probably respond asking what we want... 06:29:17 yeah, we need to have clear vision on it then. so let's start the discussion on the list. 06:30:12 I think the original context was a bug report involving mfabian iirc where rtcm mentioned that it should be considered for the redesign 06:30:31 sure 06:30:59 should probably include a bz link to that 06:31:08 mfabian, do you remember? 06:31:17 yes, that would be helepful to understand the requirements of the redesign 06:32:09 looking for link ... 06:32:40 mfabian: can you add a comment on the ticket when you find it out? 06:33:32 let's move on then 06:33:48 #topic Outstanding task 06:33:48 #info #32: Fedora 21 i18n test day (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:33:48 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/32 06:35:11 maybe I should polish the result page to improve visibility and post the summary of the result. 06:35:26 will do that by next meeting 06:35:59 #action tagoh_ to summarize the result of i18n test day 06:36:08 #info #35: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N cleanup (i18n@lists.fedoraproject.org) 06:36:08 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/35 06:36:20 no updates? 06:39:37 #topic New topic 06:39:37 #info #37: Should we need i18n-sig fas group? (pnemade) 06:39:37 #link https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/37 06:40:54 well, parag pointed out if we could apply the beta-testers for group maintainership where posted at the list 06:40:57 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203114.html 06:42:11 anyone have any comments? 06:43:26 a few thoughts 06:43:54 it might help with sharing package maintenance load 06:44:27 yes 06:44:42 or for updating a large number of i18n packages together say 06:44:58 maybe paragan has more ideas, dunno 06:45:27 dunno if we have enough potential usage to make it useful for beta testing though 06:45:29 the second one might be likely to see for ibus huge-updates perhaps? 06:45:52 ah yes or fonts perhaps 06:45:58 right 06:46:08 etc 06:46:59 currently we have i18n-team pseudo group - but seems it would need i18n-sig group to be setup 06:47:19 this might be confusing too - or perhaps they can support i18n-team, dunno 06:47:41 right. given that we are moving to i18n-sig, we don't need i18n-team group anymore? 06:47:57 if, perhaps 06:48:00 that might be duplicate 06:48:04 right 06:49:16 I am not sure on urgency, it seems like something more for f22, but it is good to know about this 06:49:54 I might be tempted to wait until it goes out of beta personally 06:50:00 I tend to agree with this idea but not sure if this is really needed for us 06:50:11 but of course it doesn't affect me much :) 06:50:31 tagoh_, right that is another point - which packages if any need thjs 06:50:33 this 06:51:13 he seems wanted to talk/discuss about it though :) 06:51:17 but maybe some people want it - hunspell-* might be another example perhaps 06:51:22 yep 06:51:29 so let's discuss more later? 06:51:36 okay 06:51:47 so in next meeting then 06:52:02 #topic Open Floor 06:52:11 anything else we want to discuss in this meeting? 06:53:33 and looking for anyone who wants to chair next meeting, too :) 06:57:11 maybe better trying to find out after the meeting... 06:57:20 okay, let's stop here if not. 06:58:30 thanks everyone for the meeting! 06:58:34 #endmeeting