14:03:52 #startmeeting Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings 14:03:52 Meeting started Mon Feb 8 14:03:52 2016 UTC. The chair is randomuser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:03:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:03:52 The meeting name has been set to 'docs_project_meeting_-_agenda:_https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/docs_project_meetings' 14:03:52 #meetingname Fedora Docs 14:03:52 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_docs' 14:03:54 #topic Roll Call 14:03:57 zodbot, ping 14:03:57 pong 14:04:03 * pbokoc 14:04:03 #chair pbokoc zoglesby pkovar 14:04:03 Current chairs: pbokoc pkovar randomuser zoglesby 14:04:27 /me is here 14:06:19 /me wonders how many people are sleeping off devconf still 14:08:30 well, that's five minutes 14:09:13 * kirsti is here 14:09:13 #topic Follow up on action items 14:09:32 #info rescheduling the meeting still seems relevant, three people are here 14:09:47 #action randomuser to send out scheduling poll already 14:09:58 #topic New Writers 14:10:57 Anyone with news of new writers? 14:12:53 yeah, I helped a few more Red Hatters from Brno set up recently... at least IRC, not sure if they made FAS accounts yet or anything 14:13:04 last week was kinda busy 14:13:13 there's one 14:13:15 i know that max did 14:13:28 cool 14:13:29 not sure if he has the right permissions though 14:13:57 I think you both are sponsors for the docs fas groups, right? 14:14:08 i am not actually 14:14:29 * randomuser was just checking 14:14:32 I might be. In any case, jhradilek definitely can sponsor people so we can settle that at some point 14:15:46 crap, wrong button 14:16:03 heh, i got removed from docs :) 14:16:09 oh noes, what did you do?! 14:16:12 hahahaha 14:16:21 i don't know :) 14:16:31 just joined the docs meeting :) 14:17:04 I meant what did randomuser do. I wasn't sure if the wrong button launched the nukes or something 14:17:06 there, you're both docs sponsors 14:17:15 randomuser: thank you :) 14:17:23 I accidentally kicked pkovar off the team :P 14:17:28 :) 14:17:39 yeah, that's kinda similar 14:18:02 is a sponsor, has a sponsor, needs a sponsor; all mostly in the same area 14:18:42 are we using the docs-writers group? 14:18:50 cspicer1, we're doing the "new writers" part of the show; any comments, questions, observations? 14:18:59 pkovar, sure, we can do that one too 14:19:22 which one is the group that lets you push your commits? 14:19:28 docs-writers 14:19:31 aha 14:19:32 in any case, there won't be any sponsoring till I read everyone's introduction mails on fedora-docs! 14:19:33 ty 14:19:35 randomuser: nothing so far :) 14:20:12 woops... *ahem* i'll send that today... 14:20:15 pbokoc: fair enough 14:20:25 and I expect a similar level of entertainment to what I got out of GARY SKEETE 14:20:31 oh no 14:20:57 yes, initiates *must* show a strong interest in creative writing 14:21:02 O_o ... good thing jhradilek sent someone else my way 14:21:11 multiple hours long rambling videos on youtube, that kind of thing 14:21:23 oh, hi kirsti :-D 14:22:57 that covers new folks, then 14:23:05 #topic Publishing 14:23:26 some discussion around this on the list lately 14:23:27 publican 2 must be destroyed 14:23:51 to recap, people seem to think that publishing should be different 14:24:55 also, quite a few people discussed fedora docs at devconf 14:25:06 oh? 14:25:20 they were wondering what's the status of the publishing side of things, and what help is needed 14:25:33 * jsmith shows up late, sorry 14:25:58 pkovar, did they find answers? 14:26:22 randomuser: not yet :) but many recommended https://pagure.io/ as a good replacement for fedorahosted 14:26:32 * randomuser nods 14:26:53 other fedora teams are already using it 14:27:17 one of the killer features is live editing of the source document 14:27:29 with previews for asciidoc, markdown et al. 14:27:31 I think that it would work nicely too, giving us both the web-based PR workflow and some feature development tools 14:27:42 yes! 14:28:01 pkovar, we asked for that live editing, and pingou delivered! 14:28:04 pingou++ 14:28:04 randomuser: Karma for pingou changed to 21 (for the f23 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 14:28:13 randomuser: excellent :) 14:28:20 pingou++ 14:28:20 pkovar: Karma for pingou changed to 22 (for the f23 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 14:28:57 The other feature I'd really like - and it may be there - are ACLs by branch 14:29:03 oh yeah 14:29:21 randomuser: using forks you could mitigate this no? 14:29:27 so that you have say maintainers allowed to push or merge stuff into master etc. 14:29:38 so we can have 'production' branches that only docs-writers can touch, and 'draft' branches that 'docs' can play with 14:30:10 i think that pagure can already support acls no? pingou 14:30:20 no per branch 14:30:22 not* 14:30:23 aha 14:31:02 pingou, yes, that would cover it for workflow; branch ACLs are a nice-to-have thing that would allow drafts to be built and previewed, without executing on arbitrary PR content 14:31:25 but that's extra sauce, not a requirement 14:32:51 so, what should we consider before a migration to pagure? 14:33:06 oh, I know 14:33:36 pingou, I have the impression that it will be available as a fedorapeople offering eventually? 14:34:06 randomuser: not following your question 14:34:37 pingou, I haven't had much coffee yet :) 14:35:23 I'm wondering if using pagure will mean not using fedorapeople, or if fedorapeople will migrate to pagure from cgit/trac 14:35:48 randomuser: fedorahosted you meant :) 14:35:54 pingou, fedorahosted, not fedorapeople 14:35:55 yeah 14:35:57 randomuser: no we plan to keep both running atm 14:36:07 in the future, if no-one uses fedorahosted anymore, we'll see 14:36:20 ok 14:38:21 pingou, pagure does know about FAS groups, right? that's really all we need 14:39:11 randomuser: nope, but you can make your own groups in pagure 14:40:02 hm, ok 14:40:28 that would also be nice to have :) 14:41:05 there is a ticket for this, but pagure is self-hostable which makes relying on FAS for groups harder 14:41:29 we're about 20 minutes in to the topic; anyone have action items ? 14:43:17 let's move on then 14:43:24 #topic Release Notes 14:43:48 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule 14:44:05 #info f24 mass rebuild has been performed 14:44:43 it occurred to me that mass rebuild failures are probably a decent signal that a package has changed in a notable way 14:45:09 so I'll probably skim over the resulting bug list for clues 14:45:36 hmm, I never thought of that 14:46:03 most packagers will not be introducing major version bumps after this point; if they do, it *should* be in a Change proposal 14:47:39 there's tons of accepted changes already, too, but I'd hold off on trying to document them since they'll inevitably, well, change 14:49:59 * randomuser nods 14:50:32 it might not be too soon to start planning for them, assigning docs contacts to the changes, etc 14:51:34 #info F24 Change Proposals are happening, many accepted; you can start tracking your favorites now but they will probably change so don't do final documentation now 14:51:52 #action randomuser to send email to list re: changes, what we can do write now 14:52:05 ... unless someone else wants to send that mail? 14:52:33 nnnnnnope :P 14:52:54 heh 14:53:34 I'm going to jump to open floor, then leave this for you folks to wrap up; there's another thing at the top of the hour I have to get set up for 14:53:42 #topic Open Floor 14:53:53 it's bcotton day, hooray! 14:54:27 okay, commute time, bye 14:54:38 o/ 14:54:44 cu 14:55:34 has anyone seen grundblom or smccann on line lately? 14:58:08 I haven't, dunno about anyone else... 14:59:19 me neither 14:59:24 anyway, I guess we can close this meeting 14:59:37 #endmeeting