15:05:19 #startmeeting kde-sig 15:05:19 Meeting started Tue Mar 8 15:05:19 2016 UTC. The chair is rdieter. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:05:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:05:19 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:05:24 #meetingname kde-sig 15:05:24 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:05:28 #topic roll call 15:05:40 hi all, friendly kde-sig meeting, who's present today? 15:06:16 hi 15:06:17 hey! 15:06:19 hi everyone 15:06:50 * pino|work o/ 15:07:06 #info rdieter tosky jreznik dvratil pino|work present 15:07:20 #chair tosky jreznik pino|work dvratil 15:07:20 Current chairs: dvratil jreznik pino|work rdieter tosky 15:07:47 that's a good start... agenda 15:07:49 #topic agenda 15:07:53 what to discuss today? 15:07:59 KF5 5.20 + KActivities split 15:08:27 (hopefully) finalize browser(s) to ship on kde-spin 15:08:41 present 15:08:46 #info than_ present 15:08:51 #chair than_ 15:08:51 Current chairs: dvratil jreznik pino|work rdieter than_ tosky 15:09:40 any other topics? 15:10:27 ok, let's go 15:10:35 #topic KF5 5.20 + Kactivities split 15:10:40 dvratil: go ahead 15:11:04 * heliocastro here 15:11:05 KF5 5.20 tarballs are up, although I don't know when I'll get around to package them, this week will be rather busy for me.... 15:11:37 (that's jst FYI) 15:11:44 dvratil: do you need to wait for the part of kalternatives that landed into kio-extras? IIRC there should be a temporary package 15:11:50 * pino|work wonders beer-rewards work with dvratil in this case 15:12:18 tosky: that's the problem, they missed the KF5 5.20 release, so the KActivities thing will be properly split in 5.21 15:12:56 Maybe we can wait or preprare the split before ? 15:12:56 dvratil: do you mean it's half-split, or that kalternatives in 5.20 is still as it was in 5.19? 15:13:03 heliocastro: not so easy 15:13:30 tosky: I haven't heard about kalternatives? 15:13:35 tosky: s/kalternatives/kactivities/ 15:13:36 argh 15:13:38 sorry 15:14:06 basically it appears to me that KF5 5.20 will have broken KActivities 15:14:24 wee for broken stuff 15:14:34 because it's missing stuff that has been split into kactivities-stats, KIO and KCMs but they were not released 15:14:47 the only released thing was KActivityManagerD as part of Plasma 5.6 15:15:04 this is at least my understanding of the problem 15:15:19 dvratil: not sure: http://marc.info/?l=kde-frameworks-devel&m=145562600424888&w=3 15:15:47 dvratil: I mean, there should be a temporary package to fill the gap, kactivities-workspace-5.5 15:15:58 the mail above accounts for every case, it seems 15:16:14 wonder why all this mess... 15:17:02 ok, in that case question is: where do we put kactivities-workspace ? 15:17:17 I don't think it makes sense to create a new package for a single release 15:18:04 dvratil: 15:18:15 maybe just stuff it into kf5-kactivites ? 15:18:27 that's where the content lives now, right? 15:18:30 yeah 15:19:07 ok, sounds like a plan :) 15:19:42 also reminds me: I'll upload new package reviews for the new Plasma 5.6 stuff sometime this week, so find your reviewer hats ;) 15:22:09 k 15:22:44 dvratil: do you recall how many new pkgs? 15:23:35 I think 4 15:23:49 grub2 theme, plymouth theme, kactivitymanagerd and plasma-integration 15:23:58 i assume those are already in the copr ? 15:24:01 indeed 15:24:13 excellent, anything else? 15:24:35 that's all from me 15:24:57 #topic finalizing browsers 15:25:32 ok, we had some discussion last week on the topic of browsers to ship on kde-spin, but I don't think we'd finalized anything... and I (and Kevin) didn't bring it onlist 15:25:33 so... 15:26:02 oh $deity, again this topic? 15:26:08 I'd proposed shipping qupzilla as an alternative/secondary browser, which wasn't controversial 15:26:37 I just wanted to make sure the second part, removing konqueror, was ok with everyone? 15:27:12 any objections to that plan? 15:27:32 fine by me 15:27:34 rdieter: no objection from my side, +1 15:28:00 just a question to the grub2 and plymouth themes - I'd say yes, we'd like to have these and I don't expect we want to market it more than we have to, right? 15:28:41 sorry folks, I was distracted by the mail barge 15:28:43 ok too, although you don't really gain much by not shipping konqueror 15:28:50 well, with qupzilla - I'd like to ship it once we have Qt 5.6 in place, it's very likely going to be next release but not earlier 15:29:08 * danofsatx looks for the konversation notification sounds, since the notification bar doesn't seem to be working 15:29:12 pino|work: true, it just seemed wierd to end up shipping 3 15:29:48 jreznik: so you'd rather wait, and not include it in f24 alpha? (freeze is today, fyi) 15:30:17 personally, I'd rather not (wait) 15:30:23 didn't kevin mentioned it needed some api change in qtwebkit 5.6? 15:31:06 he was pushing that it be shipped as the primary browser, so I'd assume it works (mostly) ok 15:31:58 either way, it's an advertised feature/change, I don't mind if it doesn't work 100% well yet at this point 15:32:01 with qtwebengine, it works pretty well, a few quirks but it can possibly replace even firefox (I saw a few bugs, misrenderings but with all issues I have with firefox...) and I think one day we would like to make it default browser... so shipping now old version will make it harder as users might try it and be unhappy 15:32:39 rdieter: yeah, but for primary it's qtwebengine version... not sure about level of old one 15:32:47 jreznik: again, are you talking about f24-alpha specifically, or not include in f24 *at all*? 15:33:21 mind you, we'd only be including it as a tech-preview kind of thing at this point, I don't see any harm in it 15:33:43 I guess saying that out loud, implies maybe it would be premature to remove konqueror yet 15:33:58 15:34:06 f24 alpha has qt 5.6 or not (sorry, I'm a bit uniformed) 15:34:19 jreznik: f24 has 5.6-rc 15:34:23 currently 15:35:51 if qupzilla is being offered as a "tech preview", it isn't replacing a darned thing. When it's officially released, then it will replace konquerer as the default browser for Fedora Plasma. 15:36:00 and as there's qupzilla 1.9.99 in f24 too, I'm ok with shipping it 15:36:23 I'd avoid shipping 1.8.9, so it's good... sorry for false alarm 15:36:35 danofsatx: that's not what we're considering right now 15:36:40 when I was on qt 5.6, it worked pretty well 15:36:55 danofsatx: it's not replacing anything right now 15:36:58 huh? I thought the question was whether to drop konquerer? 15:37:33 danofsatx: well, you mentioned 'replacing konqueror as default browser" 15:37:38 [3/8/16 09:26] I just wanted to make sure the second part, removing konqueror, was ok with everyone? 15:37:49 konqueror isn't the default browser 15:37:58 (firefox is currently) 15:38:04 I get all that - let me rephrase. 15:39:08 qupzilla is being offered as a tech preview, eventually with the goal of replacing konquerer as the native browser for Fedora Plasma. Until that time that is officially released, i.e., no longer a preview, it isn't replacing konquerer, so konquerer shouldn't be dropped. 15:39:36 ok, I'm fine with keeping it too. 15:39:46 danofsatx: konqueror is not the default brower now 15:39:48 it = konqueror (for now) 15:40:27 as pino|work (?) mentioned, we don't gain much by dropping it 15:40:40 any other browser-related comments before moving on? 15:41:27 no, the horse is dead. 15:41:42 #topic open discussion 15:41:46 anything else for today 15:41:48 ? 15:43:01 oh, as hinted earlier, today is f24-alpha freeze, fyi 15:43:41 \o/ 15:44:04 so time to get to testing f24 in earnest 15:44:27 * danofsatx will be installing on laptop this weekend 15:44:56 i hope so too, but I've also been threatening that for weeks :-/ 15:45:01 Wasn't here at start, so not sure, I think we should offer a preview of wayland session by default (not default choice, of course)? 15:45:52 mustafam: I'd rather not, for now, we can reconsider for beta I guess 15:46:17 including it, implies that it actually (mostly) works, which it doesn't in my experience 15:47:01 at least it starts (talking about 5.6) :) 15:47:03 (but I don't feel strongly) 15:47:27 5.6 from copr works, thanks to Dani 15:47:50 but in the end, I don't think were will be a huge gap between gnome shell and plasma by default, it's progressing 15:47:53 I think the only major problem is the no-gtk+ thing 15:48:16 mustafam: it's really very early tech preview, not suitable for users... 15:49:01 Fair enough 15:49:12 but doing some marketing - aka try it if you're brave, sure, I'm in 15:49:49 ok, sounds like something we can re-evaluate once plasma-5.6 lands in rawhide? 15:50:24 5.7 ;) 15:51:17 I think we will have 5.6.3 for F24 15:51:31 So hope this will be eveluator ready 15:57:21 alright, we're out of open discussion topics, thanks everyone for coming today 15:57:26 #endmeeting