15:02:23 #startmeeting kde-sig 15:02:23 Meeting started Tue Apr 19 15:02:23 2016 UTC. The chair is rdieter. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:02:23 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:02:27 #meetingname kde-sig 15:02:27 The meeting name has been set to 'kde-sig' 15:02:30 #topic roll call 15:02:38 .hello lupinix 15:02:39 lupinix: lupinix 'Christian Dersch' 15:02:39 hi all, who's present for a friendly kde-sig meeting today? 15:03:07 hi 15:03:25 hey 15:03:26 hi 15:04:01 #info rdieter lupinix tosky mbriza pino|work present 15:05:08 #chair lupinix tosky mbriza pino|work 15:05:08 Current chairs: lupinix mbriza pino|work rdieter tosky 15:05:31 #topic agenda 15:05:40 welcome friends, what to discuss today? 15:06:04 * rdieter has kde-config-gtk (as mentioned onlist) 15:06:26 can give plasma-5.6.x status update 15:06:53 * danofsatx-n6 is kinda-sorta here 15:07:05 #info danofsatx-n6 is kinda-sorta here 15:07:06 :) 15:07:16 ;) 15:07:58 I suppose we could touch on f24/f24-beta(freeze) 15:08:28 anything else? 15:09:01 nothing here 15:09:08 k, let's get started 15:09:17 #topic using kde-config-gtk by default (for f24) 15:09:46 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kde@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZWPGQDI5LMJNPZXVV3AFVR5PSVHW6JFO/ 15:10:11 per my post onlist, I'm proposing we drop (deprecated) kcm-gtk/xsettings-kde in favor of using kde-config-gtk by default 15:10:50 drop or deprecate? IIRC you mentioned a cycle of non-installation and then removal (or was it about another package?) 15:10:52 as Kevin mentioned in his followup (and I agree), xsetting-kde is the technically superior solution, but it's not ported to kf5 or supported upstream really anymore 15:11:11 i saw commits in xsettings-kde in past months 15:11:15 tosky: either way is fine with me 15:11:38 pino|work: but nothing integrates with it anymore 15:11:50 kcm-gtk (kinda) did that part 15:12:27 iirc what it does is exposing the kde settings as xsettings, which are read by gtk 15:12:55 pino|work: right, but it only currently works with kde4's kdeglobals (and friends) 15:13:12 and now without gtk-kcm, nothing signals it to react to config changes either 15:13:12 yep 15:13:50 * jreznik_ is here, sorry for being late 15:13:54 * heliocastro here 15:13:57 I'm disappointed with kde-config-gtk development, that this wasn't taken into account and used, but I'm not the one doing the work either 15:13:57 Late as usual 15:14:08 * lupinix votes for: kde-gtk-config as default and stop providing xsetting-kde later (maybe f25) 15:14:11 #info jreznik_ heliocastro present 15:14:22 lupinix: +1 15:14:35 Ok, even late i know the discussion +1 15:14:48 Just i think we can drop now xsettings 15:14:55 Can't see reason to keep it 15:14:56 rdieter: well, imho xsettings-kde should "just work", ie reload the config it exposes with no need for others to signal that 15:15:24 pino|work: there was a special signal it used to receive to see config changes, iirc 15:15:36 yeah, and sounds like an hack ;) 15:15:37 (and it wasn't dbus ) 15:15:57 nod, so ideally, xsettings-kde needswork as well to be a first-class well-supported citizen 15:16:14 rdieter: Is there one list of needs for the current kde-gtk-config 15:16:19 anyway, +1 in not shipping gtk-kcm, and +1 in deprecating it for f24 15:16:24 Maybe we can try to implement upstream 15:16:47 heliocastro: not that I'm aware of, I haven't had much time to look closely myself, but that's definitely a good idea 15:17:38 I think the most interested in change this code are the distros itself 15:17:56 I think the kde-config-gtk implementation writes a static gtkrc, and then signals gtk apps to reload (instead of using an xsetting daemon) 15:19:51 * heliocastro thinks that kde miss a general board of wishlkist/requirements for projects 15:20:08 kanboard for specifics is ok 15:20:10 any objections to eol'ing kcm-gtk/xsettings-kde earlier in f24 (instead of waiting for f25)? 15:21:27 seems pino|work, heliocastro support that at least 15:21:47 +1 to deprecate 15:22:04 ok, I'll add Obsoletes: in kde-config-gtk for upgrade path 15:22:11 +1 15:22:16 and retire the packages soonish, after that change hits stable updates 15:22:27 (only for f24+) 15:22:35 moving on ... 15:22:55 #topic updates status 15:23:12 1. plasma-5.6.2 is in f23 updates-testing, getting excellent feedback so far 15:23:31 2. I started importing kde-aps-16.04.0 bits into rawhide (and some f24 builds) yesterday 15:23:58 3. and... plasma-5.6.3 landed today too, so I'll probably prioritize this (over kde-apps-16.04.0) 15:24:12 +1 (late) 15:24:34 I confirm the feedback on Plasma 5.6.2, I upgraded yesterday; someone reported an upstream issue with autohiding the panel, but I would say not blocker (unless it was fixed in 5.6.3) 15:24:41 too crazy update paces 15:25:11 kde-apps-16.04 included some not-insignifiant pim-related changes and new modules, so that part will probably require some work (and time) 15:25:57 remember that Applications now has khelpcenter, so after you package it (and ends up into f23) you can stop compiling the version from plasma 5.6.x 15:26:24 wrt 16.04, I finished the core bits, graphics, network (including ktp) bits, in rawhide and f24 -testing 15:26:34 present 15:26:41 #info than present 15:26:51 tosky: ah, indeed, thanks for the reminder 15:27:27 odd seeing both khelpcenter-16.04.0.tar.xz khelpcenter-5.6.3.tar.xz released so close to each other 15:27:37 rdieter: I think we can slow daown the pace on newer versions 15:27:38 eh, it was moved during this cycle 15:27:52 it was the only way 15:27:55 heliocastro: I have been skipping some kde-apps releases (lack of time mostly) 15:28:06 Lets wait f24 been out and get initial traction 15:28:31 the kde-apps set of stuff is ... not small :) 15:29:03 I am "mother-in-law" free again, and can resume my duties as well time related 15:29:11 giggle 15:29:13 lol 15:29:38 heh 15:29:42 :D 15:29:54 oh, not directly fedora related, but... epel7: got kf5 and friends packaged and in epel7-testing 15:30:12 all those updates need a few more days or one more +1 karma 15:30:28 People, KARMA, NOW :-P 15:30:30 very nice, i have to look whether kstars and some others are buildable mow 15:30:31 (if anyone is interested in seeing that get out sooner rather than later) 15:30:32 *now 15:30:42 * rdieter gets bodhi links 15:31:29 dbusmenu-qt5 : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c6830d3eb1 15:31:38 phonon-qt5 : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8e9b956ff2 15:31:48 polkit-qt5 : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-83b0af5ec7 15:32:00 kf5 : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-f057025262 15:32:36 rdieter: ehm, what about qtstyleplugins update for f23? that is holding (for me) the qt5.6 update 15:33:15 f23: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0c64e66086 15:33:17 pino|work: ^^ 15:33:23 and it works, already tested 15:33:30 f24 : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-15eb65d7ca 15:33:44 tosky: then +1 it 15:33:47 :) 15:33:49 give 'em +1 karma, and they can go to stable faster, excellent 15:34:18 and for completeness: epel7 : https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-73f10ae03f 15:34:45 any other updates worth mentioning ? 15:35:15 "karma"gedon done ! 15:35:25 done 15:35:42 * rdieter saves that term "karmagedon" 15:35:55 "This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi." so easy? :) 15:36:18 moving on... 15:36:25 tosky: Several karmas in less than a minute ? Bodhi for sure feels treatned 15:36:28 \o/ 15:36:29 #topic f24/f24-beta/freeze 15:36:45 f24-beta is coming soon, freeze is today 15:37:16 just fyi ^^ 15:37:30 Is anything to worry aside gcc 6 incompletness ? 15:37:55 I think f24 is pretty great, and no unresolved kde-related blockers 15:38:18 there's the qt(4) BUILD_KEY snafu, that I'm rebuilding a handful of qt4/kde4 packages for 15:38:45 .bug 1327360 15:38:47 rdieter: Bug 1327360 qt > 4.8.7-6.fc24 fails to load any plugins (including styles) - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1327360 15:38:50 tracked here ^^ 15:39:11 but I think we have a good handle on that 15:39:44 (after having to rebuild a bunch of stuff... twice, since bodhi helpfully untagged my qt override) 15:40:26 After they clear the beta, i will upgrade ,my dev machine 15:40:53 it's been running well on my box, since pre f24-alpha even :) 15:41:14 usually I update to pre-alpha but this time I'm a bit behind :) 15:41:22 rdieter: +1 15:41:23 I will upgrade mine, too. 15:42:02 * danofsatx-n6 departs the parking lot 15:42:04 anything else worth mentioning wrt f24/f24-beta ? 15:44:18 moving on... 15:44:22 #topic open discussion 15:44:29 anything else for today? 15:44:42 are there any (urgent) open reviews? 15:44:46 rdieter: Just a question, is spectacle packaged ? 15:44:50 Or considered ? 15:45:05 heliocastro: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=21741 15:45:08 heliocastro: yes, for awhile 15:45:16 \o/ 15:45:24 and pkg reviews, good question 15:45:28 i was using a self compiled for some time and lost the track 15:45:41 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=kde-reviews tracker bug has a few 15:45:55 .bug 1321902 15:45:56 lupinix: Bug 1321902 Review Request: qt5ct - Qt5 Configuration Tool - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1321902 15:45:59 this is my one 15:46:17 ah, right, not something for kde spin, but beneficial to other DE's 15:46:32 definitely want that 15:46:54 related tracker, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 15:47:16 aka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=qt-reviews 15:48:16 I guess the plymouth, grub breeze theme pkgs passed review, and I submitted SCM request 15:48:28 yeah, for other DEs it can be useful (qt5ct) 15:48:34 be nice to get some testable packages out of those 15:48:53 * tosky needs to drop, sorry 15:49:28 .bug 1287201 15:49:35 lupinix: Bug 1287201 Review Request: kf5-kross-interpreters - Kross interpreters for KDE Frameworks 5 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1287201 15:50:02 rdieter: i could do this one, is there a newer release? 15:50:15 15.12.x or sth. like this 15:50:43 yes, 15.12.3 is there 15:50:48 lupinix: yes, I haven't updated it in awhile, but I doubt it's changed significantly 15:51:01 it should be reviewable as-is for onw 15:51:03 now 15:55:16 thanks everyone for coming 15:55:18 #endmeeting