#fedora-meeting: F25 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (jkurik, 17:00:18)
   
2. Purpose of this meeting (jkurik, 17:03:46)
   1. Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or not F25 Alpha is ready for shipment, according to the release criteria. (jkurik, 17:03:48)
   2. This is determined in a few ways: (jkurik, 17:03:50)
   3. No remaining blocker bugs (jkurik, 17:03:51)
   4. Release candidate compose is available (jkurik, 17:03:53)
   5. Test matrices for Alpha are fully completed (jkurik, 17:03:54)
   6. https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/25/alpha/buglist (jkurik, 17:04:04)
   7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_Branched_20160807.n.0_Summary (jkurik, 17:04:06)
   
   
3. Current status (jkurik, 17:04:26)
   1. We do not have so called RC for the Fedora 25 Alpha release due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365661 (jkurik, 17:04:35)
   2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315541 being one of them (dgilmore, 17:05:32)
   3. there are also other blockers like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315541 (jkurik, 17:07:02)
   
   
4. (1365917) kernel panic at boot - x2apic_cluster_probe+0x33/0x70 (adamw, 17:08:39)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365917 (adamw, 17:08:41)
   2. Proposed Blocker, kernel, POST (adamw, 17:08:43)
   3. AGREED: 1365917 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - on our best guess as to how much hardware would be affected, and because there's a fairly easy workaround, we don't think this is quite broad enough to block Alpha, but definitely severe enough to warrant a freeze exception (adamw, 17:14:44)
   
   
5. (1367321) system reboots 1 second after selecting a kernel in grub (adamw, 17:14:53)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367321 (adamw, 17:14:53)
   2. Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 17:14:53)
   3. AGREED: 1367321 - punt (delay decision) - we don't yet have a clear enough feel for how much hardware is affected by this to make a decision, we will send out a request for more people to test (adamw, 17:21:54)
   
   
6. (1315541) fsck.ext4 discard sometimes fails when run in Koji (results in live image compose failure) (adamw, 17:22:08)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315541 (adamw, 17:22:08)
   2. Proposed Blocker, lorax, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:22:08)
   3. AGREED: 1315541 - punt (delay decision) - we have +2 / -1 blocker votes so far, this is a pretty squishy issue for blocker purposes, we have some ideas for addressing it so we'll delay the decision for a while and see how things change (adamw, 17:45:27)
   
   
7. (1366403) [abrt] sssd-common: ipa_dyndns_update_send(): sssd_be killed by SIGSEGV (adamw, 17:45:40)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366403 (adamw, 17:45:40)
   2. Proposed Blocker, sssd, ON_QA (adamw, 17:45:41)
   3. AGREED: 1366403 - punt (delay decision) on blocker, AcceptedFreezeException - we are no longer sure if this bug has true blocker consequences (it's not clear whether it actually prevents domain login). if it's still outstanding, adam will re-test and confirm and we will vote next time. An sssd crasher is certainly serious enough to grant a freeze exception, however (adamw, 17:52:27)
   
   
8. Go/No-Go decision (jkurik, 17:56:27)
   1. The decision is No-Go due to missing RC and present blockers (jkurik, 17:58:19)
   2. ACTION: jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result (jkurik, 17:58:43)
   
   
9. Open floor (jkurik, 17:58:50)

Action items

1. jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result

Action items, by person

1. jkurik
   1. jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (78)
2. jkurik (63)
3. dgilmore (53)
4. nirik (25)
5. stickster (21)
6. coremodule (16)
7. sgallagh (13)
8. zodbot (13)
9. jforbes (9)
10. kparal (8)
11. lbalhar (5)
12. pschindl_ (3)
13. mboddu (3)
14. mythcat (3)
15. smooge (1)