15:00:37 #startmeeting Prioritized_bugs_and_issues 15:00:37 Meeting started Wed Dec 14 15:00:37 2016 UTC. The chair is jkurik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:37 The meeting name has been set to 'prioritized_bugs_and_issues' 15:00:45 #meetingname Fedora Prioritized bugs and issues 15:00:45 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_prioritized_bugs_and_issues' 15:00:53 #topic Roll Call 15:01:01 #chair jkurik mattdm mcatanzaro dustymabe sgallagh 15:01:01 Current chairs: dustymabe jkurik mattdm mcatanzaro sgallagh 15:01:11 .hello sgallagh 15:01:12 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 15:01:20 * mattdm is here; wrapping up FAmSCo meeting in another channel 15:01:24 Hi Stephen 15:01:29 Hi mattdm 15:02:54 FYI, I have a hard-stop in one hour. 15:03:06 I have it as well 15:03:09 But there are only two proposed BZs, so that's not likely to be an issue 15:03:45 ok, lets move on 15:03:50 #topic Purpose of this meeting 15:03:54 #info The purpose of this process is to help with processing backlog of bugs and issues found during the development, verification and use of Fedora distribution. 15:03:59 #info The main goal is to raise visibility of bugs and issues to help contributors focus on the most important issues. 15:04:07 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues_-_the_process?rd=Fedora_Program_Management/Important_bugs_and_issues_process 15:04:16 #topic Evaluation of proposed bugs 15:04:23 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=6795225&namedcmd=FedoraPrioritized_Nomination&remaction=run&sharer_id=352756 15:04:53 So, as far as I can see there are no new bugs nominated for the list of prioritized bugs 15:05:08 we only have the two we have reviewed the last meeting 15:05:24 so let's see where those are? 15:05:30 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues 15:06:19 no new bugs! woot 15:06:34 So, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366897 seems to be on it way to be fixed 15:07:55 jkurik: +1 15:08:17 silly question, is PrioritizedBug for rawhide only ? 15:08:20 From my POV we can leave the BZ 1366897 as it is as it seems we will have the fix soon 15:08:34 (if not, I have a good one I just added) 15:08:36 rdieter: no, it is for any issue we have 15:10:14 #info Bug #1366897 (many crashes on GNOME logout) on QA now 15:10:40 thanks mattdm 15:10:49 lets move to the one rdieter proposed 15:11:04 .bug 1399396 15:11:04 jkurik: Bug 1399396 – Plasmashell freezes - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1399396 15:11:20 #topic Bug 1399396 – Plasmashell freezes 15:11:51 rdieter: any justification, why this should be on the list of prioritized bugs ? 15:12:20 (I do want to review the other open one at some point) 15:12:36 jkurik: because it's bad and affects lots of users? 15:12:39 jkurik: Looks to be affecting a pretty large cross-section of our users 15:14:04 recent evidence seems to point at a regression in xorg-x11-server since GA release of xorg-x11-server-1.19.0-0.3.20161026.fc25 15:14:15 ok, reading the bug it seems to be quite serios for me, so I am +1 15:15:07 what other people on the meeting think of it ? 15:16:17 I'm also +1 15:16:28 +1 15:16:56 It does seem serious — I can at least try to bring it to the attention of the Xorg devs who might not be looking at plasma 15:17:06 (Actually, I could see a real argument to this being a blocker as well) 15:17:36 I'm also not sure it's limited to plasma; I've been seeing some odd long freezes (every couple hours) that recover after 20-30s on GNOME 15:18:01 sgallagh: on Wayland? 15:18:22 mattdm: Yes on Wayland, but that doesn't rule out the thirty XWayland apps I have running all the time :) 15:19:57 If I understand correctly we do not even know for sure whether it is caused by mesa, Xorg or graphic card driver 15:20:15 Yeah, it's delightfully vague 15:20:27 Anyway, let's tag it as "prioritized" and move on. 15:20:39 Someone with more domain-specific knowledge can take over from there. 15:20:54 "move on" does imply that we try to find that someone with domain-specific knowledge. do you know who that'd be in this case? 15:21:28 proposed #agreed Bug 1399396 has been agreed on the list of Prioritized bugs as it affects pretty large cross-section of our users 15:21:53 proposed #agreed Bug 1399396 has been agreed on the list of Prioritized bugs as it affects pretty large cross-section of our users and is also probably a candidate to a Blocker bug 15:22:43 ack 15:22:57 mattdm, sgallagh ^^^ is it ok ? 15:23:01 jkurik: yep 15:23:07 jkurik: ack 15:23:09 #agreed Bug 1399396 has been agreed on the list of Prioritized bugs as it affects pretty large cross-section of our users and is also probably a candidate to a Blocker bug 15:23:19 .bug 1394755 15:23:19 jkurik: Bug 1394755 – screen recording freezes GNOME under Wayland when gstreamer cache is updated - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1394755 15:23:30 #topic Bug 1394755 – screen recording freezes GNOME under Wayland when gstreamer cache is updated 15:23:51 This bug has meandered quite a bit. 15:24:41 Yeah. I'm going to nominate it for de-prioritization, since it seems to be narrowed down to a specific screen recorder problem 15:24:54 rather than OMG random freeze for everyone for no known reason 15:25:10 And by "I'm going to", I mean "I do so nominate, now" 15:25:20 from the comment #30: 15:25:22 From the upstream bug report: 15:25:23 "The only sane way forward is to stop using gstreamer in the compositor which is in the plans." 15:25:42 so it seems like the upstream does not want to work on a fix here 15:26:20 jkurik: The purpose of this group is to determine if it's worth spending our limited influence pushing for a fix here. 15:26:52 I agree with mattdm that with what we know now, it's probably not. 15:27:12 what I mean is that there is no need to push for a fix if the upstream is going to implement a workaround 15:28:11 anyway ... 15:28:13 proposed #agreed Bug 1394755 is de-prioritization, since it seems to be narrowed down to a specific screen recorder problem 15:28:19 patch 15:28:49 proposed #agreed Bug 1394755 is de-prioritized, since further investigation has revealed that the scope of affected users is much smaller than originally believed. 15:28:53 +1 15:29:03 ack 15:29:48 sounds good 15:30:02 #agreed Bug 1394755 is de-prioritized, since further investigation has revealed that the scope of affected users is much smaller than originally believed. 15:30:06 sgallagh: thanks 15:30:21 so that is all from the bugs we have .... 15:30:26 jkurik++ 15:30:27 #topic Open Floor 15:30:27 mattdm: Karma for jkurik changed to 3 (for the f25 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:30:28 jkurik: I have something for open floor 15:30:48 I have rewritten the process a bit as agreed on the last meeting 15:31:04 Two weeks ago, during this meeting we came up with a general set of criteria for how to make these decisions. I don't see them on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues_-_the_process 15:32:42 hmmm... I have not made an action for me to put it on the process page so ... 15:32:56 I will fix it till the next meeting 15:32:59 Thanks 15:33:15 #action jkurik to update the process page to describe the consensus-based decision process 15:33:18 thanks for chasing me :) 15:34:02 Anything else for the Open Floor ? 15:34:19 thanks jkurik and sgallagh for your work on this -- definitely making Fedora better for everyone! 15:34:52 ok, so I am going to close the meeting in one minute .... 15:34:59 thanks all for comming 15:36:03 #endmeeting