14:00:34 <mattdm> #startmeeting Council (2018-01-17)
14:00:34 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Jan 17 14:00:34 2018 UTC.  The chair is mattdm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:34 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
14:00:34 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'council_(2018-01-17)'
14:00:35 <mattdm> #meetingname council
14:00:35 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'council'
14:00:37 <mattdm> #chair mattdm jkurik jwb langdon robyduck bexelbie dperpeet Amita
14:00:37 <zodbot> Current chairs: Amita bexelbie dperpeet jkurik jwb langdon mattdm robyduck
14:00:39 <mattdm> #topic Introductions, Welcomes
14:00:40 <cverna> thanks stickster
14:00:45 <jkurik> .hello2
14:00:46 <bexelbie> .hello bex
14:00:50 <Amita> .hello amsharma
14:00:59 <mattdm> Goodbye, magazine people! Hello council people!
14:01:08 <zodbot> jkurik: jkurik 'Jan Kurik' <jkurik@redhat.com>
14:01:18 <zodbot> bexelbie: bex 'Brian (bex) Exelbierd' <bex@pobox.com>
14:01:21 <zodbot> Amita: Something blew up, please try again
14:01:36 <Amita> :D
14:01:48 <mattdm> .hello2
14:01:49 <zodbot> mattdm: Something blew up, please try again
14:01:52 <mattdm> nice.
14:02:05 <Amita> .hello amsharma
14:02:16 <zodbot> Amita: amsharma 'Amita Sharma' <amsharma@redhat.com>
14:02:19 <dperpeet> .hello dperpeet
14:02:20 <Amita> thanks
14:02:25 <langdon> .hello2
14:02:31 <zodbot> dperpeet: dperpeet 'None' <dperpeet@redhat.com>
14:02:38 <zodbot> langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' <langdon@redhat.com>
14:02:47 <mattdm> Cool. Josh already said he couldn't make it. Not sure about robyduck
14:02:53 <jkurik> hi dperpeet 'None'
14:03:07 <mattdm> and I think we have everyone else.
14:03:14 <mattdm> So let's get started.
14:03:25 <mattdm> #topic Today's Open Floor Agenda
14:03:30 <jwb> in another meeting at the moment, apologies
14:03:49 <dperpeet> jkurik, I should change that to nemo
14:03:51 <mattdm> jwb: no problem. after the election, we should look to see if this is still the best common time
14:04:23 <langdon> mattdm: im +1 on that... i also have some conflicts now
14:04:28 <mattdm> #info This is an Open Floor meeting. That means we construct an agenda now based on what people are interested in talking about.
14:04:48 <mattdm> #info How this works: people suggest topics, I take a few minutes gauging interest and put them in order
14:04:57 <mattdm> #info and we go through each one spending about 5-10 minutes
14:05:11 <mattdm> #info if we are spending more than that time on one thing, I ask for a vote to continue.
14:05:24 <mattdm> So, what things are on people's minds this morning (or afternoon or evening)
14:05:33 <Rhea> .hello rhea
14:05:34 <zodbot> Rhea: rhea 'Radka Janek' <radka.janek@redhat.com>
14:05:43 <Rhea> !
14:05:54 <mattdm> welcome Rhea. Go ahead.
14:06:10 <Rhea> I would like to ask if you could take a look at #171 today?
14:06:17 <Rhea> here: https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/171
14:06:58 <mattdm> Rhea: yeah. in fact, I think we should go through all of the FY18 spending budgets
14:07:06 <mattdm> spending tickets i mean
14:07:07 <langdon> #170?
14:07:13 <mattdm> because we're running out of fy18
14:07:37 <mattdm> yeah, modularity objective.
14:08:13 <mattdm> anything besides spending and modularity?
14:08:38 <mattdm> bexelbie: can you put together a list of the spending tickets?
14:08:44 <mattdm> Let's do:
14:08:55 <mattdm> #info Topic 1: Modularity refresh
14:09:15 <mattdm> #info Topic 2: FY18 spending requests
14:09:21 * bexelbie goes to work on that
14:09:24 <mattdm> and then break down topic 2 when we get there.
14:09:28 <mattdm> Sound good everyone?
14:09:33 <jkurik> yes
14:09:45 <mattdm> okay then :)
14:09:59 <Amita> I wanted to ask about https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/council-docs/issue/11
14:10:02 <Amita> from bexelbie
14:10:12 <Amita> but let's see if time permits
14:10:17 <mattdm> amita sounds good
14:10:26 <Amita> Sure
14:10:28 <mattdm> #info Topic 3: fedora council role docs
14:10:36 <mattdm> #topic Modularity Objective
14:10:43 <mattdm> #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/170
14:11:10 <mattdm> This is the continuing saga of the "rings" part of the Fedora.next initiative
14:11:14 <mattdm> from several years ago.
14:11:22 <mattdm> Langdon says it ends up not being rings, but I disagree :)
14:11:35 <langdon> rings are for the simple minded ;)
14:11:40 <mattdm> ouch :)
14:11:52 <langdon> n-space hypercubes ftw
14:11:56 <mattdm> In short: we had a prototyping phase for this as an initiative previously
14:12:15 <langdon> two actually :) design, then prototype...
14:12:16 <mattdm> That did what prototypes often do: build something which turned out to have lots of problems....
14:12:20 <mattdm> oh yeah.
14:12:34 <mattdm> But now we have what looks like a good handle on something that will really work.
14:12:44 <mattdm> This initiative aims to put that into production.
14:13:06 <robyduck> .hello robyduck
14:13:07 <zodbot> robyduck: robyduck 'Robert Mayr' <robyduck@gmail.com>
14:13:08 <langdon> right... but we have some stuff we are giving up... but we can get that stuff later... maybe
14:13:22 * mattdm looks at the "timeframe" in the wiki and edits "F28 and F28" to "F28 and F29"
14:13:33 <langdon> oops
14:13:46 <mattdm> langdon: any more to say? any questions, anyone else?
14:14:24 <jkurik> if we are talking about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization_%E2%80%94_The_Release then I am OK with the objective
14:14:27 <langdon> if people are interested in the details of what did and didn't work i will be giving a talk about it at devconf.. under a poorly talk name at the moment
14:14:54 <mattdm> jkurik: yes, that's the one
14:15:05 <mattdm> did I forget to link that?
14:15:09 <mattdm> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization_%E2%80%94_The_Release
14:16:40 <bexelbie> I am +1 as well
14:16:47 <langdon> obviously, i am +1
14:16:50 <mattdm> I'm +1, for the record
14:17:00 <mattdm> langdon I hope so :)
14:17:05 <bexelbie> Will you continue to represent the initiative during this phase langdon ?
14:17:18 * bexelbie doesn't recall seeing the rep mentioned
14:17:18 <langdon> bexelbie: thats my plan
14:17:25 <langdon> really?
14:17:32 <mattdm> bexelbie: yes, langdon is tagged as objective lead
14:17:32 <langdon> i thought it ws in there.. /me goees to look
14:17:33 <mattdm> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization_%E2%80%94_The_Release#Objective_Lead
14:17:42 <bexelbie> ahh it is there
14:17:45 <bexelbie> I just read over it
14:17:46 <bexelbie> sorry about that
14:17:46 <mattdm> needs a picture, perhaps :)
14:17:51 <langdon> ha
14:17:53 <bexelbie> and a small bio!
14:18:15 * langdon needs to fix his user page..
14:18:27 <langdon> i thought it had content but discovered yesterday it is blank
14:19:05 <mattdm> People who have followed my Logic Model obsession may note that this one lacks the arrows from left to right
14:19:20 <mattdm> we actually had them on the whiteboard ...
14:19:22 <bexelbie> I noticed that
14:19:25 <bexelbie> re: arrows
14:19:31 * x3mboy in spy mode as always
14:19:31 <bexelbie> assumed you left them out for clarity
14:19:36 <mattdm> the groups in input map nicely to activities but it is a big mass of spiderwebs
14:19:46 <mattdm> and likewise actitivies to outputs
14:20:12 <mattdm> I have some concern with outputs to outcomes, because theoretically that should be a nice 1:1 or 1:few or few:1 mapping
14:20:32 <mattdm> but in this case, we kind of have a big "if we have *all* of these outputs" situation
14:20:43 <mattdm> which means there is some risk
14:20:47 <mattdm> I mean, a lot of risk
14:21:02 <mattdm> but, that's where we are and it can't really be helped I don't think
14:21:07 <mattdm> So I'm still +1 to trying :)
14:21:56 <bexelbie> Given the risk, I would like to see the situation regularly discussed and reported on - I don't want us to get to the end and not know it isn't working out ...
14:21:58 <mattdm> I am not hearing anyone oppposed and there are more than three yesses, so I'm going to mark this approved
14:22:41 <mattdm> jwb, robyduck -- didn't hear from you, so let me know if you have concerns
14:22:42 <langdon> well.. and it is "addon".. right so it doesn't block anything
14:22:59 <mattdm> langdon: Yeah, but it is a big chunk of work so there's opportunity cost
14:23:08 <langdon> true
14:23:17 <mattdm> but let's see how it goes :)
14:23:25 <langdon> but oppty cost !=  risk ...
14:23:45 * robyduck is fine
14:24:18 <mattdm> okay, ship it :)
14:24:33 <mattdm> #topic Budget requests for FY18 (ending soon!)
14:24:45 * robyduck is still sick, over always over 100F, so I'm a bit off the line....
14:25:06 <mattdm> robyduck: that doesn't sound good!
14:25:29 <robyduck> not really, no, but can't change it :)
14:25:37 * mattdm wonders if there is a way to get zodbot to ship icepacks or medicine
14:25:44 <mattdm> bexelbie: do you have that list?
14:25:50 <bexelbie> In reverse numerical order: https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/175, https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/174, https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/171, and maybe (private) https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/173 which would need to be opened to be funded.
14:25:58 <bexelbie> order selected because of the default sort
14:26:23 <Rhea> Or... green tea, real one, not that leftover powder you can buy in store...
14:26:33 <mattdm> Rhea++
14:26:33 <zodbot> mattdm: Karma for rhea changed to 10 (for the f27 release cycle):  https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any
14:26:43 <mattdm> #topic  #175 LATAM Budget Increase - Swag
14:26:47 <mattdm> https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/175
14:27:05 <mattdm> This is basically a request to stock up on supplies
14:27:21 <mattdm> which is a traditional end-of-year thing to do for Ambassadors, as I understand it
14:27:42 <mattdm> My only question is: LATAM only? What about other regions?
14:27:49 <bexelbie> Yes, this also is actually resupplying LATAM which has not been fully restocked in a while
14:27:57 <bexelbie> The other regions currently don't need budget to do their swag purchases
14:28:03 <bexelbie> LATAM needs it
14:28:09 <bexelbie> therefore the other regions won't go through council at this time
14:28:15 <mattdm> ah okay.
14:28:20 <bexelbie> s/at this time/at all/
14:28:23 <bexelbie> unless they run out of $$
14:28:28 <mattdm> as noted in ticket, I'm for it
14:28:49 <bexelbie> I filed it on behalf of the ambassadors down there because of timing, but am independently +1
14:28:50 <robyduck> +1 too
14:29:20 <mattdm> ok. seems straightforward. marking approved. i'll make that comment -- bexelbie  can you #topic the next item?
14:29:41 <bexelbie> #topic Docs FAD 2018 - https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/174
14:29:45 <bexelbie> #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/174
14:30:17 <bexelbie> Some of this spending will definitely bleed into next FY because of timing issues.  This needs to be approved knowing that things like food, for sure will not make the FY cut
14:31:13 <mattdm> I'll repeat my comment in the ticket: This is relatively high for a FAD, although not out of line with some of the others we've done before, but I also think it will have a big impact
14:31:34 <robyduck> bexelbie: nobody cared even about the docs Mindshare rep, is it possible to nominate one by the end of the voting period?
14:31:41 <robyduck> +1 with mattdm
14:31:59 <bexelbie> robyduck, I don't think so, but I am hopeful we can get one as we regrow that group and this FAD should help there
14:32:07 <mattdm> robyduck: I think the problem is that there's really not an active team. This fad should help rebuild that
14:32:08 * bexelbie will rep for docs until there is a rep for Mindshare
14:32:18 <mattdm> Should we add "select a mindshare rep" to the outcomes?
14:32:48 <bexelbie> An explicit goal of this FAD is to get interested parties without regard to their already being in the docs FAS group in hopes of building a base to grow on from Fedorans
14:32:52 <robyduck> mattdm: I hope 10k will help finding people :)
14:32:56 <bexelbie> or non-Fedorans who are qualified
14:33:20 <mattdm> robyduck: yes, exactly :)
14:33:21 <robyduck> yeah, can we add this to the FAD? Having bex as interim rep is fine too, in the meanwhile
14:33:54 * bexelbie edits the wiki
14:33:58 <mattdm> cool.
14:34:15 <mattdm> okay, with robyduck +1 that's the required three positive votes. anyone have concerns about this?
14:34:15 <langdon> so. .. a little confused...
14:34:36 <bexelbie> robyduck, refresh please :)
14:34:39 <langdon> this is the docs rep to the mindshare team? that is being discussed ^^ ?
14:34:54 <mattdm> langdon: this is the whole docs fad
14:34:57 <robyduck> +1
14:35:13 <langdon> yeah... im just confused on the "reps" conversation part
14:35:18 <jwf> Sorry for the late arrival – I'm around but in a dayjob meeting. If my vote is needed, please ping me
14:35:31 <mattdm> jwf: only if you want to vote against things :)
14:35:42 <Amita> +1 for docs FAD
14:36:08 <mattdm> langdon: because Docs is not currently functional, the seat for that group on the Mindshare committee is empty
14:36:17 <jwf> I've kept up with ticket comments and nothing is against my conscience :)
14:36:19 <mattdm> We just added "fill that spot" to the FAD's goals
14:36:24 <mattdm> jwf thanks!
14:37:13 <mattdm> It's worth noting that we may end up doing this in the EU instead of Raleigh if that works out to be convenient for more of the attendees
14:37:21 <langdon> mattdm: got it.... ok.. i was confused about "direction" .. like mindshare -> docs or docs -> mindshare
14:37:32 <mattdm> langdon: here, it's docs -> mindshare
14:38:19 <mattdm> langdon: other than that any particular concerns? want to come do some writing? :)
14:38:40 <langdon> ha... i am not sure i can be free for those dates.. i am speaking at scale
14:38:42 <langdon> but ill look
14:38:52 <bexelbie> We are definitely looking for active writing participation
14:39:04 <bexelbie> this is not just a talk/strategy FAD and there is hopefully limited infra work needed
14:39:18 <mattdm> #info this is a sit down and actually write stuff FAD.
14:39:40 <mattdm> Okay, I'm marking this approved and we can move to the next one
14:40:46 <mattdm> #topic fedoraloves.net swag - https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/171
14:40:56 <langdon> i want some of that swag!
14:41:02 <mattdm> This is a relatively small request
14:42:10 <bexelbie> Rhea, how many people are in the .NET SIG and active right now?
14:42:12 <mattdm> Rhea: is there a roadmap for the pre-built tools required to build the stuff to become all open/self-hosting?
14:42:49 <Rhea> No roadmap, nope, it's all hanging on upstream progress, where the source-build doesn't'have any plans or roadmaps.
14:43:16 <mattdm> I see this as having the *potential* to bring in new users and contributors from a pool we haven't really accessed before
14:43:33 <Rhea> There are 7 active and a few more occasional contributors
14:43:45 <langdon> i have a number of friends in the dotnet community who are super excited to get off windows
14:43:47 <bexelbie> I am +1 swag - I want to know that we have a roadmap for getting in front of devs
14:44:05 <bexelbie> and a good roadmap means we should print a little extra swag
14:44:28 <Rhea> We don't have have a roadmap, this is not a product.
14:44:37 <mattdm> I'd like to get this to places other than FOSDEM and Devconf
14:44:45 <bexelbie> roadmap means where you want to go to present it
14:44:46 <Rhea> This is a ... explaining to MS how open source works
14:44:49 <bexelbie> not how you are developing it
14:44:49 <mattdm> Let's get it to where the dotnet developers are
14:45:31 <Rhea> Microsoft is in the lead with majority of the development force, we are there to tell them what they're doing wrong - only recently we all realised that they didn't understand that we need the tools to be built from source...
14:45:47 <mattdm> Rhea: magic word there is "self-hosting"
14:46:00 <Rhea> I don't understand the term self hosting when it comes to this technology
14:46:24 <mattdm> Rhea: able to be built from itself.
14:46:30 <mattdm> but that's a tangent, I think
14:46:48 <langdon> like you can't compile the dotnet vm on linux (last i knew) .. you must build it on windows
14:46:52 <Rhea> I am not able to present at too many places myself, but stickers can fly everywhere eh
14:46:56 <mattdm> I'm +1 to this, but I'd _also_ like to see plans to have presence to Microsoft Build
14:47:18 <bexelbie> yeah, but stickers on a table have limited impact.  Do we have enough SIG members to get this material used in a conversation?
14:47:20 <Rhea> langdon: you can build everything from source, our packages are built from source on Fedora.
14:47:25 <mattdm> it doesn't need to be Rhea, but we need ambassadors for this, whether from Ambassadors or elsewhere
14:47:28 <langdon> mattdm: +1 ... i am happy to work that booth (spent many years as a c# and vb developer)
14:47:32 <bexelbie> yes
14:47:33 <Rhea> langdon: we just use a pre-built "tool or two" to do it
14:47:43 <bexelbie> and this also is a chance to test a "give a talk; get a shirt" concept
14:48:02 <robyduck> yeah, I think bexelbie got it to the point, just making some swags is not enough (same applies for ambassadors)
14:48:17 <Rhea> Yup, sounds like a good incentive
14:48:19 <langdon> mattdm, bexelbie just to be clear, build does not have a cfp ... microsoft would have to ask us.. which they might... but we need to talk to some people
14:48:23 * mattdm looks at clock -- can we approve the swag ticket for now, with a note that we'd like to see a conference/outreach plan to go with it?
14:48:37 <x3mboy> !
14:48:39 <mattdm> langdon: I'm pretty confident that we could get asked.
14:48:47 <mattdm> x3mboy: feel free to jump in
14:48:53 <mattdm> you people with your polite hand-raising :)
14:49:12 <langdon> mattdm: yeah... im sure too.. but we need to a) have a person who will speak b) tell the people at ms to ask the person to speak :)
14:49:22 <bexelbie> Rhea, is the calendar entry for the DotNet meetings in fedocal accurate?  I can try to drop in and help with mechanics on getting conferences ont eh calendar; also I can help with ordering/warehousing/shipping
14:49:28 <Rhea> I'll be talking to people at devconf/fosdem about where to take it further, so after that I can share more info
14:49:32 <Rhea> bexelbie: yes it is
14:50:16 * mattdm is waiting on x3mboy :)
14:50:22 <x3mboy> I know Rhea knows this, because she feels it in her own flesh, but most contributors (and it's worse with Ambys) are not happy with dotnet in Linux, so first we need to educate ourselves (the Fedora Project) on why this is good for us
14:50:44 <langdon> bexelbie: link to the meeting in fedocal? i don't see it
14:50:51 <Rhea> cause it's'open and free ;)
14:51:01 <mattdm> x3mboy: "not happy" in the sense that people are worried about technology that comes from Microsoft?
14:51:09 <bexelbie> #link https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/SIGs/#m4933
14:51:15 <langdon> i am pretty happy about it...
14:51:28 <x3mboy> mattdm, yeah! Most people thinks "If come from MS, so it's bad"
14:51:35 <x3mboy> Paranoia everywhere
14:51:36 <Rhea> langdon: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/SIGs/2016/11/4/#m4933
14:51:40 <bexelbie> x3mboy, sounds like a great chance to start a video/podcast series - let's ask .NET to do a 10 min talk on this we can share out
14:51:46 <langdon> bexelbie, Rhea thanks
14:52:01 <mattdm> I'm curious how many people really think that vs. people who are worried that people think that :)
14:52:08 <x3mboy> bexelbie, Well, my podcast serie is waiting for mattdm to answer my email xD
14:52:31 <mattdm> But in any case, it's well-noted that there's need for internal outreach as well
14:52:32 <x3mboy> .NET sig will be a great 2nd article
14:52:43 <mattdm> x3mboy: uh, when did you send that mail? :)
14:53:00 <bexelbie> x3mboy, let me know how I can help with that
14:53:01 <Rhea> I wrote a bunch of blogs on... microsoft-hate being a "legacy feeling" as Brian said once :P
14:53:05 * bexelbie even has a microphone :P
14:53:15 <Rhea> I'll keep it up more after the conferences.
14:53:20 <mattdm> Rhea++
14:53:25 <bexelbie> Rhea, it might be better to approach this from a "here is where we are" not "stop hating"
14:53:33 <Rhea> yup
14:53:34 <robyduck> mattdm: re-looking at clock :)
14:53:38 <x3mboy> bexelbie, Really? I need it! I was willing to ask for funding to buy one for Mktg
14:53:41 <mattdm> robyduck: yeah good call :)
14:53:47 <robyduck> can we approve this and add the note you said before?
14:53:48 <Rhea> Well I was putting it into a reflection with "i don't like python, i don't hate you for it"
14:53:49 <robyduck> :D
14:54:01 <bexelbie> x3mboy, it is RH/Fedora property (not public budget for those looking)
14:54:04 <x3mboy> mattdm, I think I ask to you via the Mktg ML
14:54:06 <mattdm> bexelbie: you okay with this swag purchase with the note as noted?
14:54:15 <mattdm> x3mboy: I'll re-check. sorry
14:54:41 <x3mboy> bexelbie, I need it for Mktg, no for me really. It's funded in the Podcast series that I'm planning with Mktg
14:54:45 <x3mboy> Ok
14:54:47 * langdon suspects x3mboy's email is in "oh well 2017" ;)
14:55:16 <x3mboy> langdon, LOL, no, it's not I sent it in Jan 10th
14:55:17 <x3mboy> :D
14:55:26 <x3mboy> </eom>
14:55:31 <bexelbie> +1 to approving with notes for the SIG to make plans for presence in FY19 at several .NET focused events
14:55:32 * x3mboy in spy mode again
14:55:56 <langdon> x3mboy: mattdm just has mine all routed to /dev/null ;)
14:56:02 * mattdm is +1 to buying  x3mboy a mike
14:56:23 <mattdm> #topic Private budget request ticket from langdon
14:56:32 <mattdm> #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/173
14:56:37 <mattdm> #info private ticket link
14:56:48 <Rhea> Okay thanks, I'll keep you informed about the future plans then.
14:56:52 <mattdm> Discuss this in ticket, council people, I guess :)
14:56:59 <robyduck> oh, for skiing holidays?
14:57:04 <bexelbie> cool
14:57:09 * robyduck joking
14:57:28 <langdon> re: 173 this is totally killable if it is too soon
14:57:29 <mattdm> bexelbie: any more budget things in the next 2 minutes?
14:57:34 <bexelbie> nope
14:57:35 <bexelbie> not yet
14:57:56 <mattdm> Also, I'm totally in favor of buying x3mboy a mic for podcasts
14:58:32 <bexelbie> I'll help him with his request when it is time :D
14:58:39 <bexelbie> Shall we try to answer Amita's q?
14:59:11 <mattdm> #topic Council docs thing
14:59:15 <mattdm> bexelbie: yes go talk fast :)
14:59:32 <bexelbie> Amita, ... you're on
14:59:41 <bexelbie> #topic  Migrate the description of the Diversity Advisor
14:59:45 <bexelbie> #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/council-docs/issue/11
14:59:46 <Amita> so what actually I need to do for https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/council-docs/issue/11
14:59:56 <Amita> I think the page need updates
15:00:04 <Amita> and ..
15:00:05 <bexelbie> page edits need to be approved by the council
15:00:18 <Amita> ok
15:00:20 <bexelbie> moving it is a mechanical process I can help you with outside of the meeting
15:00:36 <Amita> right
15:00:59 <Amita> so I need to just move it?
15:01:01 <bexelbie> any  other questoins?
15:01:09 <bexelbie> yeah, I can help or I can even just do it
15:01:14 <Amita> or I should send the edits for approval ?
15:01:14 <bexelbie> I jsut wanted to get it done :)
15:01:21 <bexelbie> same as the one for FPgM
15:01:24 <bexelbie> they come to the council in a ticket
15:01:32 <Amita> ah ok
15:01:37 <bexelbie> The move is a copy.  Changes are a separate issue
15:01:41 <bexelbie> we can move the page first
15:01:46 <bexelbie> then your changes can be a PR that is discussed in council
15:01:48 <Amita> sound good
15:01:59 <mattdm> bexelbie: Is this going to ruin my thing of having exactly 7 topics under each menu item on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-project/council/charter.html ?
15:02:06 <bexelbie> mattdm, you found me out
15:02:16 <mattdm> nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
15:02:18 <bexelbie> but we could put it under council members or charter if you want
15:02:27 <bexelbie> along with the two exiting descriptions and add the FPgM one
15:02:32 * bexelbie looks at jkurik
15:02:42 <jkurik> bexelbie: I know :)
15:02:52 <mattdm> I can live with two more pages
15:03:34 <bexelbie> jkurik, we can talk about your page moving too if you want after conferences
15:03:37 <mattdm> okay, anything else? we're running into jkurik's next meeting :)
15:03:37 <bexelbie> or nowish :D
15:04:20 <langdon> meetings!
15:04:30 <mattdm> okay, ending this one
15:05:17 <mattdm> #endmeeting