16:00:26 #startmeeting Council (2018-06-20) 16:00:26 Meeting started Wed Jun 20 16:00:26 2018 UTC. 16:00:26 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:00:26 The chair is mattdm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:26 The meeting name has been set to 'council_(2018-06-20)' 16:00:29 #meetingname council 16:00:29 The meeting name has been set to 'council' 16:00:31 #chair mattdm jkurik jwb langdon robyduck bexelbie dperpeet Amita dgilmore pbrobinson tyll 16:00:31 Current chairs: Amita bexelbie dgilmore dperpeet jkurik jwb langdon mattdm pbrobinson robyduck tyll 16:00:33 #topic Introductions, Welcomes 16:00:47 Hi everyone! Who is around? 16:00:51 .hello2 16:00:52 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 16:01:07 hi langdon 16:01:27 hi mattdm! nice article btw 16:01:45 thank you. you are seeing, I think, the eighteenth draft :) 16:02:04 mattdm: half-kiddingly, i was wondering if it was ghost written 16:02:10 * pbrobinson o/ 16:02:29 nope, all me :) 16:02:33 i am triple booked. will try to pay attention 16:02:48 okay, we got four of us. 16:02:57 I know robyduck has been very busy lately 16:03:07 and bexelbie is galavanting around japan 16:04:12 dunno about the others 16:05:09 okay, so... maybe this will be quick 16:05:16 #topic Today's Open Floor Agenda 16:05:28 This is open floor meeting. You know the drill 16:05:34 I have a couple of things: 16:05:39 1. Fedora CoreOS 16:05:44 2. Discourse 16:06:12 and I guess since we have langdon and pbrobinson, maybe a few #info lines on the state of Modularity and IoT 16:06:17 anything else? 16:06:21 i got nothing really.. need to do an update for the modularity objective 16:06:32 ohh.. that was for agenda 16:06:37 ill think about a #info 16:06:50 heh, exacrtly. 16:06:53 okay. so 16:06:58 #topic Fedora CoreOS 16:07:03 there was much announcing this moring 16:07:06 morning 16:07:12 #link https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-coreos/ 16:07:27 that + the faq basically explains it all 16:07:30 excited to see the return of fedora core? ;) 16:07:39 That's in the annoucement! 16:07:54 thats what made me think of it :) 16:07:59 So far, this has been relatively quiet 16:08:03 kind of to my surprise. 16:08:18 bgilbert from coreos says to just wait until the west coast wakes up 16:08:25 ha 16:08:37 this leads to the next thing: 16:08:44 #topic Fedora Discourse server 16:08:54 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ 16:09:04 discourse is a modern, open source web-based discussion system 16:09:09 (with email integration, too) 16:09:21 * langdon wonders if this topic is his fault 16:09:24 The CoreOS team wanted to use this for user communication rather than a mailing list 16:09:43 apparently not (only) 16:09:59 So sbonic is, at least for now, paying for hosting from the Atomic/CoreOS osas budget 16:10:13 Yeah not just langdon :)( 16:10:29 I've been interested in this for Fedora for a long time, but, like everything it takes some doing 16:10:32 ooo just processed that link 16:10:39 mattdm: mhh, did we turned the email integration ? 16:10:50 misc: I dunno. also, thanks misc for setting this all up 16:11:02 and puiterwijk for whatever insane wizardry 16:11:10 it uses FAS for accounts :) 16:11:12 mattdm: I did nothing for discourse, besides telling "go pay for it" :p 16:11:38 ha! i can even do that! 16:11:40 So, I'm basically seeing this as an experiment for possible broader use 16:12:10 For one thing, although the hosted situation with Ask is way better than it falling apart in place... 16:12:24 it still isn't _really_ seeing new development and is kind of stuck in 2009 or so 16:12:41 whereas this is an active project 16:12:58 which was a good year for wine (IIRC).. 16:13:18 langdon: are you now comparing askbot to wine? :) 16:13:21 langdon: depends on the grape region ;) 16:13:38 RFE: can we make it use your fp.o alias rather than the address that your alias is mapped too? 16:13:39 grape/region even 16:14:06 langdon: maybe. that sounds like a misc / puiterwijk question :) 16:14:07 i was more saying.. some things get better with age :) 16:14:12 langdon: we can, but please open an infra ticket 16:14:22 puiterwijk: ok 16:14:24 (as I'll forget otherwise) 16:14:29 so is it CLA+1 ? 16:14:41 and if we use the alias, that mean people need to have one 16:14:41 misc: no, it requires just a FAS user 16:14:55 and @fedoraproject.org only works for CLA+1 16:15:00 cause I think discourse send email to the email 16:15:16 but we can discuss in the ticket that langdon is gonna open 16:15:27 #action langdon open a ticket for his discourse request 16:15:38 in progress 16:15:41 yeah let's figure that out separately 16:16:08 We could theoretically just disable all outbound email and use FMN for all notifs. But that's also separate 16:16:13 Anyway, it seems that at least among those of us in this meeting there is enthusiasm for this at the council level 16:16:16 so it's not just me :) 16:16:22 (since we'll have discourse2fedmsg hopefully today) 16:16:28 puiterwijk++ 16:16:34 * mattdm needs more special fpl cookies 16:16:48 mattdm: open an RFE on github.com/fedora-infra/supybot-fedora :D 16:16:56 * pbrobinson drools..... cookies.... 16:17:00 ha 16:17:04 puiterwijk: we don't want to disable mail, though, because it's got _incoming_ reply-via-mail too 16:17:16 Okay, fair enough. 16:17:22 Was just giving random ideas :) 16:17:29 anyway. any more thoughts or questions on that? 16:18:06 mattdm: will it be discussed in flock ? 16:18:16 (the discourse stuff) 16:18:21 misc: that's a good idea. hmmm let me think about that. 16:18:37 we should have some interesting idea of how it's going by then 16:18:48 yup, timing would be good 16:19:08 as you all probably know from fedmsg, done 16:19:15 #action mattdm to propose a working session on discourse at flock 16:19:28 #topic State of Modularity 16:19:42 langdon: did you find some #infos? :) 16:19:43 uh oh.. i havent thought of my #info yet 16:20:03 pbrobinson: you first? 16:20:08 #undo 16:20:08 Removing item from minutes: 16:20:13 #topic Internet o' Things 16:20:24 things are rolling along 16:20:40 like, it's a rolling release now? :) 16:20:55 we have nightly build for F28, and will have rawhide later this week 16:21:13 mattdm: go and listen to the council interview again... monthly rolling ;-) 16:21:19 heh 16:21:37 oh, and speaking of previous topic 16:21:39 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/iot 16:21:40 now that there's something for people to actually play with there's people starting to poke and do things and provide feedback 16:22:06 are people showing up? do we need to poke them to do some poking? 16:22:24 the Fedora CoreOS announcement was perfect timing too as I've had a lot of "How does CoreOS affect Fedora IoT" questions 16:22:37 people are showing up 16:23:03 I've been a little in soft launch trying not to drown myself 16:23:16 I think we'll start to see that expand out 16:23:51 I'll be doing a Q&A tomorrow with the 96boards community https://twitter.com/96Boards/status/1009466129218187264 16:24:10 ooh, that's exciting 16:24:11 feel free to info that and spread it wider# 16:24:51 apparetnly also on #96boards and #OpenHours on this very irc network 16:25:05 oh look and it's our old friend bluejeans :) 16:25:07 yes, and correct 16:25:21 pbrobinson: i think you are a chair 16:25:56 #info Chat with Peter about Fedora IoT at 16:00 UTC tomorrow 16:26:00 #link https://twitter.com/96Boards/status/1009466129218187264 16:26:17 Last question: anything you need help with? 16:26:31 #info Fedora IoT Q&A tomorrow with Linaro 96boards OpenHours https://www.96boards.org/openhours/ 16:26:46 probably the WG stuff 16:27:07 it keep slipping because it's not the thing that keeps yelling at me :) 16:27:25 like, formalizing it? 16:27:26 slowly fleshing out bits here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/InternetOfThings 16:27:40 well things I need to do formally like docs and processes etc 16:27:52 we have a weekly meeting now, minuted etc 16:28:25 is minuted a systemd meetbot!??! :) 16:28:26 we basically need a Secretary of IoT 16:28:28 the official monthly releases I think makes sense to start once the CoreOS bits have landed 16:29:02 are you thinking of using some of the provisioning bits from CoreOS? Like, Ignition? 16:29:26 I thought we had someone able to help with secretary stuff, I think that's been delayed, I've been doing minutes for the moment 16:29:48 yes, and the updates platform when it's open sourced 16:30:01 I'm not sure all the details of that 16:30:13 cool. I'm not sure either. 16:30:19 I'm not sure if the team is. :) 16:30:34 I've got a whole bunch of other stuff (bolting down systemd for services etc), profiles etc that I'm hoping to start landing next week 16:30:42 So, we do have our new Fedora Program Manager starting next week 16:30:43 and some Changes stuff I also need to write up 16:31:14 I may ask them to help you with this stuff as a starting task 16:31:57 let's go over to langdon now 16:32:02 #topic Modularity 16:32:06 ok.. so 16:32:12 that would be awesome, sometimes (with all the other IoT stuff I get landed with internally too) it sometimes ends up being stuck in process switching contexts before my brain crashes and reboots ;-) 16:32:34 sounds like an iot device :) 16:32:34 pbrobinson: *nod* 16:33:16 want to switch now? 16:33:19 yes. :) 16:33:29 libdnf is moving along.. but slowly.. 16:33:30 langdon: too much compute power for IoT.... and my food bill would say it draws to much energy ;-) 16:33:48 LOL, libdnf.... :) 16:33:53 I am concerned that there are no updates in 16:33:56 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575626 16:34:29 like, "triaged" on May 14, and devel whiteboard to "category:modularity" on May 29 16:34:33 other than that, crickets 16:34:44 And not even literal crickets. that'd be _something_ 16:34:50 * langdon trying to open link 16:35:05 It's the blocker bug for f29 beta 16:35:25 yeah.. sorry.. brain isn't handling multi-tasking well 16:35:45 ok.. so i talked to the team today / yesterday.. and there is definite progress.. ill try to get them to post some info 16:36:35 so.. not much more to say on that.. but ill poke them 16:36:50 that would be helpful. this remains a key feature for Fedora, and it's disconcerting to have that in the dark 16:37:01 yeah 16:37:06 sgallagh also wrote a change for f29 for expansion of modularity support 16:37:07 makes it hard to really recommend working on modules in the community outside of a narrow context 16:37:59 yeah.. i am not excited about the status either 16:38:20 okay. well. thanks for poking :) 16:38:29 anything else? 16:38:33 the change ^^ 16:38:40 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModulesForEveryone 16:39:04 langdon++ 16:39:04 mattdm: Karma for langdon changed to 1 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:39:05 woah.. meetbot auto-picked up a link? 16:39:10 really.. 16:39:13 sgallagh++ 16:39:13 langdon: Karma for sgallagh changed to 11 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:39:58 okay. we done here, then? :) 16:40:05 we are also working on module tools.. fedmod has had some improvements.. but they have been tough between me busy on devconf.us and lots of vacations because summer 16:40:28 otherwise.. im good 16:40:44 Is it time for me to try again to switch my `calc` package over to being just modular? 16:40:52 sure 16:40:55 (I want to only maintain the stream branches.) 16:41:28 mattdm: Count me in for the Discourse discussion @ Flock :-) 16:41:28 right.. i think it would work pretty well now.. nothing deps on it does it? 16:41:32 ok, cool. But if it isn't easy, I'm *definitely* complaining to you. 16:41:45 langdon: no. it's a pretty ideal easy case 16:41:56 jwf awesome 16:42:08 #topic Open Floor 16:42:11 anything else? 16:42:11 mattdm: like so few things 16:42:37 as I noted, new FPgM starting next week. 16:42:46 WOOT 16:42:50 jkurik++ 16:42:50 langdon: Karma for jkurik changed to 1 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:43:17 jkurik++ indeed 16:43:17 mattdm: Karma for jkurik changed to 2 (for the f28 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:43:26 okay, I think that's it, then. 16:43:29 thanks everyone! 16:44:03 (oh: I think probably with that and with s/nb/tyll/, we should revisit the meeting times yet again. this plan is clearly not really working.) 16:44:05 hopefully they travel less than bex :) 16:44:32 mattdm: that can be the new FPgM first gig! 16:44:49 scare them early! 16:44:52 heh. trial by fire 16:45:10 push this scheduling boulder to the top of this calendar hill 16:45:11 mwhhahaha 16:45:20 * langdon runs off to kid science fair.. see y'all 16:45:25 thanks again 16:45:27 #endmeeting