05:31:25 <paragan> #startmeeting i18n
05:31:25 <zodbot> Meeting started Tue Apr  9 05:31:25 2019 UTC.
05:31:25 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
05:31:25 <zodbot> The chair is paragan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
05:31:25 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
05:31:25 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'i18n'
05:31:25 <paragan> #meetingname i18n
05:31:25 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'i18n'
05:31:26 <paragan> #topic agenda and roll call
05:31:26 <paragan> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2019-04-09
05:31:30 <pwu> hi
05:31:35 <tagoh> hi
05:31:36 <pyadav> hi
05:31:51 <mfabian> hi
05:32:38 <paragan> Hi all
05:32:41 <fujiwarat> hi
05:32:59 <pravins> hi all :)
05:33:17 <paragan> #chair pwu tagoh pyadav mfabian fujiwarat pravins juhp vishal_vvr
05:33:17 <zodbot> Current chairs: fujiwarat juhp mfabian paragan pravins pwu pyadav tagoh vishal_vvr
05:33:46 <paragan> Let's start
05:33:51 <paragan> #topic Upcoming schedule
05:33:56 <juhp> hello
05:34:05 <paragan> so last week we saw Fedora 30 Beta released
05:34:44 <paragan> and the next milestones are
05:34:54 <paragan> #info 2019-04-16 	Final Freeze (*)
05:35:01 <paragan> #info 2019-04-30 	Fedora 30 Final Release (GA) (Preferred Target)
05:35:34 <paragan> so we have got one week to get any package bug fixes and bodhi to push them to stable
05:35:44 <paragan> all need to happen before 16th April
05:36:00 <paragan> anyone got any important bug to be fixed for Fedora 30?
05:36:47 <mfabian> Should the Japanese era in libicu be fixed for f30?
05:36:51 <juhp> https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/30/final/buglist
05:37:48 <paragan> mfabian, it should be fixed in f30 but if it will take some time to fix them we can schedule it as 0-day errata
05:38:32 <paragan> the important bug from above list as Adam reported on Fedora lists is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690429
05:38:35 <mfabian> I am not sure yet how difficult it is, I worked on that  last week, it looks easier for F30 than for RHEL8.
05:38:43 <paragan> I too saw this happening on my F30 system
05:38:55 <juhp> mfabian: let's start with fedora then
05:39:33 <mfabian> Yes, I’ll see if I can do it for F30 today and then try to backport to RHEL8.
05:39:45 <juhp> cool
05:39:57 <pravins> +1 good to start with Fedora.
05:40:03 <juhp> paragan: aha - I thought mine was better but not sure
05:40:59 <paragan> yeah even noticed that session gets logout when my laptop lid is closed for longer time, will see if I need to report a bug for that
05:41:16 <juhp> oh
05:41:44 <paragan> I saw similar report at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1053#note_463453
05:44:17 <paragan> Last week I participated in Fedora Silverblue 30 test day. There was some issues with gnome-software package due to which people faced issues fetching metadata and package installations
05:44:35 <paragan> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2019-04-05_Silverblue_Testday
05:45:00 <juhp> I see - it was also discussed in the WS WG yesterday
05:45:00 <paragan> the fix is already available now
05:45:29 <paragan> If anyone want to test it, good to test those testcases from that test day
05:46:01 <paragan> juhp, aha
05:46:36 <juhp> Is it available for Silverblue?
05:47:11 <paragan> need to check
05:47:47 <paragan> I overridden fixed gnome-software package to make repo work
05:48:12 <juhp> vendor libs...
05:49:05 <paragan> anything else to discuss here? otherwise we will move to tickets discussions
05:51:27 <paragan> #topic Outstanding issue
05:51:27 <paragan> #info #107: Docs Beats for Fedora 30 (pnemade)
05:51:27 <paragan> #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/107
05:52:37 <paragan> I have prepared langpacks release notes here -> https://pagure.io/fork/pnemade/fedora-docs/release-notes/raw/2e3ed18668c1d0f85d5dc05ef9e08a8595633c29
05:53:03 <paragan> anyone else want to add any particular thing to highlight for F30 release
05:54:11 <paragan> there is no f30 branch for release-notes project yet so will report new PR against master branch of release-notes project
05:55:31 <pwu> maybe pango Unicode support.
05:57:28 <paragan> pwu, Can you provide the text to be included in https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/107 ticket?
05:58:00 <pwu> paragan: sure
05:58:18 <paragan> thanks
05:58:36 <paragan> moving to next ticket
05:58:51 <juhp> Do the docs team usually review text or just commit?
05:59:07 <juhp> I mean for PRs
06:00:03 <paragan> don't know
06:00:13 <juhp> (https://pagure.io/fork/pnemade/fedora-docs/release-notes/c/2e3ed18668c1d0f85d5dc05ef9e08a8595633c29?branch=master)
06:00:15 <juhp> okay
06:00:38 <paragan> thanks for reviewing it :)
06:02:08 <paragan> #topic No assignee issues
06:02:08 <paragan> #info #108: add Fedora CI tests to our important packages (petersen)
06:02:08 <paragan> #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/108
06:02:44 <paragan> anyone got a chance to look into writing CI tests for our packages?
06:03:06 <juhp> paragan: I could make a few tweaks, that's why I ask :)
06:03:13 <juhp> but fork of a fork...
06:04:04 <paragan> um not sure how can I help you but your tweaks are welcome to improve it
06:04:07 <juhp> Can anyone have a working CI test prepared in git before the next meeting?
06:04:23 <juhp> paragan: maybe i just pass to you directly
06:04:28 <paragan> sure
06:06:02 * juhp is running `rpm-ostree upgrade` too
06:08:38 <paragan> Okay let's try to have something by next meeting
06:08:43 <paragan> moving to next ticket
06:10:27 <paragan> #info #105: Fedora 28 Bug triaging (pnemade)
06:10:27 <paragan> #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/105
06:10:44 <paragan> Good to see many people including QE participated to triage the bugs
06:11:39 <paragan> now we have F28 bug count 24 only.
06:13:04 <juhp> We could all take one bug
06:13:31 <juhp> vishal_vvr: you have quite a few there for liberation
06:13:42 <pravins> yeah, it will be nice if everyone help into this.
06:14:26 <pravins> unfortunately this task is not very popular, so need helping hands.
06:14:39 <juhp> I will retriage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532523 (google-droid-fonts)
06:14:40 <vishal_vvr> juhp, yes have fixed many and also push it to bodhi. should close few
06:14:41 <pravins> we tried for badges as well but not much progress on it.
06:14:54 <juhp> vishal_vvr: please
06:15:46 <juhp> The simplest f28 bugs are those that just be just moved to f29 or later....
06:15:53 <juhp> as usual
06:16:18 <juhp> s/just/can
06:16:50 <juhp> Any more volunteers?
06:17:19 <juhp> Will there be a triage event?
06:19:39 <paragan> anyways keep triaging the bugs
06:20:04 <paragan> hopefully we will have lesser bugs on the f28 dashboard
06:20:14 <paragan> by next meeting
06:21:15 <paragan> #topic Open Floor
06:21:16 <juhp> Noone else agrees to take one bug to triage?
06:21:40 <juhp> tagoh: should we merge all the Noto fonts under fontconfig?
06:21:43 <pwu> I agree.
06:22:24 <tagoh> juhp: merge what?
06:22:44 <juhp> With Noto Sans etc
06:22:53 <paragan> I will work on bugs for components where we are not assignee
06:23:12 <juhp> I suppose I meant font families
06:23:31 <pwu> I think I can help triage for gnome-initial-setup of i18n bugs.
06:23:38 <tagoh> ah, I see. hmm, not sure. that may helps for usability though
06:23:42 <juhp> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532523#c10
06:23:58 <tagoh> juhp: you mean like google droid right?
06:24:12 <juhp> Well it will be more useful if Noto is univeral default probably...
06:24:19 <juhp> Yeah
06:25:17 <juhp> OT but I made a small tool over the weekend to download fedora iso images etc: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/fedora-img-dl/
06:25:49 <tagoh> We can try but we still don't have any solution for issues we have ever seen with droid fallback. like the priority for JP, SC and TC etc.
06:26:31 <juhp> It can download Live images for rawhide, branched devel, live respins etc, also Beta - also works for other editions
06:26:44 <juhp> tagoh: aha
06:26:53 <juhp> tagoh: can you explain?
06:27:04 <juhp> ah I see
06:27:15 <juhp> relative priority hmm
06:27:33 <juhp> can it not be locale based?  or that is what you mean
06:29:25 <tagoh> vaguely remember so need to revisit to see how we can do that with Noto and issues if any.
06:29:46 <paragan> pwu, yes please you can help with g-i-s bugs
06:30:24 <tagoh> since we didn't have anything for droid yet.
06:31:09 <tagoh> anyway, will update once that picture comes to mind.
06:31:15 <juhp> thanks
06:31:20 <pwu> Ah, it seems fujiwarat already comment.
06:32:02 <pwu> paragan: okay, I will check, too.
06:32:09 <juhp> So just to recap - the primary question f28 triaging is: is this bug specific to F28?
06:32:58 <fujiwarat> pwu: I just commented to file a issue in gitlab. It would be nice that you work on it. My priority would be low in that bug.
06:33:41 <pwu> fujiwarat: Okay
06:35:52 <paragan> anything more to discuss
06:36:00 <paragan> if not I will close this meeting
06:36:08 <paragan> thanks all who came to this meeting :)
06:36:39 <paragan> keep discussing on our team channels
06:36:43 <paragan> #endmeeting