05:30:39 #startmeeting i18n 05:30:39 Meeting started Tue Jun 4 05:30:39 2019 UTC. 05:30:39 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 05:30:39 The chair is paragan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:30:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:30:39 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:39 #meetingname i18n 05:30:39 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:39 #topic agenda and roll call 05:30:39 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2019-06-04 05:31:05 hi 05:31:08 hi 05:31:09 hi 05:31:47 hi 05:32:21 hi 05:33:01 hi 05:33:14 #chair tagoh_ pyadav pwu_ pravins suanand fujiwarat 05:33:14 Current chairs: fujiwarat paragan pravins pwu_ pyadav suanand tagoh_ 05:33:18 let's start 05:33:34 hi 05:33:46 #chair petersen vishalvr 05:33:46 Current chairs: fujiwarat paragan petersen pravins pwu_ pyadav suanand tagoh_ vishalvr 05:34:01 #topic Upcoming schedule 05:34:34 hi 05:34:36 I see currently nothing specific going on for Fedora 31 05:35:10 but the next milestone is in next month 05:35:16 #info 2019-06-26 Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline (requires infrastructure changes) 05:35:16 #info 2019-07-02 Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline (System Wide Changes) 05:35:16 #info 2019-07-02 Change Checkpoint: Proposal submission deadline (Changes requiring mass rebuild) 05:35:54 we will discuss about Changes in our ticket 05:36:49 moving to next topic 05:37:05 #topic No assignee issues 05:37:05 #info #108: add Fedora CI tests to our important packages (petersen) 05:37:05 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/108 05:37:24 any updates on this? 05:37:43 I see few of the fonts packages got some CI testing added 05:38:17 good to work on other packages as well 05:39:32 Do we need to have CI tests for every packages? 05:39:55 I think so 05:40:44 #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages 05:41:18 those are going to be executed during package build. So should be for each package 05:42:35 (I think they need to update the Targeted release field) 05:42:35 its after package has been built 05:43:56 let's keep working on adding CI tests 05:44:01 moving to next ticket 05:44:02 Right. self testing can be in %check. 05:47:16 #info #109: Tracker for Fedora 31 Changes (pnemade) 05:47:16 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/109 05:47:29 anyone planning to submit F31 Change? 05:48:37 mfabian_, any update on ibus-typing-booster Change? 05:51:13 if nothing in planning do think about your current development 05:51:47 paragan: thanks. 05:51:59 okay, moving to next ticket 05:52:09 #info #110: Fedora 29 Bug triaging (pnemade) 05:52:10 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/110 05:52:37 this is just informative ticket to remind all that we have some bugs reported against fedora 29 to triage and work on them :) 05:54:35 moving to next ticket 05:55:10 #info #113: Planning i18n hackfest during flock 2019 (pravins) 05:55:10 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/113 05:55:36 Proposal has been submitted. Thanks all for providing feedback and input for hackfest. 05:55:52 First cycle of proposal review is started already. 05:56:39 good to hear that :) 05:56:59 let's wait for any feedback on our proposal 05:57:00 pravins: thanks 05:57:22 pravins++ 05:57:24 paragan: Karma for pravins changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 05:57:42 Btw I am thinking about doing a discusison session on langpacks at Flock 05:57:59 Think Silverblue etc 05:58:09 petersen: did you proposed slot for it? 05:58:13 Not yet 05:58:36 I want to do that this week 05:58:38 For 1 hour? 05:58:47 Max probably 05:58:52 Could be 05:59:04 LGTM 05:59:23 Yeah I hope it would be interesting - pretty interesting to me anyway :) 06:02:23 We have more topics? 06:02:37 #topic Open Floor 06:02:43 anything to discuss here? 06:03:25 Btw any news on noto cjk vf? Asking for a friend :) 06:04:04 Well there were some mentions about Noto in the WS WG yesterday... 06:04:16 Nope AFAIK 06:04:18 So I checked on the numbers 06:04:20 okay 06:04:42 tagoh_: but available for general Noto right? 06:04:50 Right 06:05:01 already packaged in rawhide 06:06:03 Yes 06:06:28 Do we have any plan to make noto vf "default" for noto? 06:06:57 for Noto? aha. sounds interesting 06:07:10 Yes 06:07:17 Would it make sense for F31? 06:07:30 Yeah, worth trying. 06:07:44 cool 06:08:37 It would be a nice Fedora Change 06:09:14 Aha 06:10:08 can someone share more information on Noto VF? 06:10:16 let me check how many languages affects on this change. 06:10:30 I guess not too much 06:13:00 tagoh_: sure 06:14:06 tagoh_: only some have VF? 06:14:21 pravins: Variable fonts - dunno how much info available 06:14:38 aha, VF means variable fonts. Ok, i got context now :) 06:14:45 tagoh_: ah you mean current defaulting to Noto 06:14:50 I see 06:14:59 sorry too terse 06:15:15 got used to just typing vf... 06:17:02 some language should has Noto as default right? not sure everything but I remember Sinhala should at least. 06:17:43 tagoh_: even Punjabi requested to default Google Noto 06:18:16 Can someone propose that change? We dropped that for F30, due to late phase 06:18:52 Aha. so good to mention that to let users encourage testing and that would be a good reason to propose Changes too. 06:18:55 * pravins commenting on change proposal ticket 06:19:33 tagoh_: yes 06:20:00 Hm, only Sinhala so far it seems. 06:20:13 pravins: thanks - I hope we can decide soon 06:20:16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554988 06:21:13 Though we added to the langpack-pa 06:21:25 langpacks-pa even 06:22:38 and yes, variable fonts for Sinhala is available so making VF default in Noto should affects for Sinhala right. 06:24:11 Okay 06:24:12 there are VF for Gurmukhi. so if we are going to make Noto default for Punjabi, that will do too. 06:24:35 well could be good guinea pigs 😬️ :) 06:24:43 Right 06:25:33 vishal_vvr: you were comparing Noto with Lohit fonts? 06:26:07 yes i did for lohit-devanagri-fonts vs noto-deva 06:26:18 dint do for gurumukhi 06:27:34 saw this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554988 , seems have issues with various glyphs 06:28:20 vishal_vvr: yeah pravins mentioned it above 06:28:49 vishal_vvr: issues? 06:29:04 hinting issues 06:30:07 my assumption by just viewing the screenshot in bug 06:30:59 petersen, i will take this as AI will compare both noto vs lohit and get back to you with stats 06:31:20 Thanks that would be good 06:31:33 I see 06:31:52 may be good to add a comment if you have any issues. probably no one is aware of that hinting issue you said. 06:31:59 Yes please 06:32:07 and report upstream if not already 06:32:07 sure 06:32:16 thanks 06:34:00 let's close the meeting 06:34:03 #endmeeting