17:40:16 #startmeeting Mindshare 17:40:16 Meeting started Wed Dec 4 17:40:16 2019 UTC. 17:40:16 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:40:16 The chair is riecatnor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:40:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:40:16 The meeting name has been set to 'mindshare' 17:40:21 hi riecatnor 17:41:03 hi 17:41:28 any one else here for the meeting? 17:42:52 guess it is just us for today :) 17:43:41 A quick intro for myself, I am Marie Nordin, newly entering the role of FCAIC.. and now working on this committee as well 17:44:33 Welcome Marie :) 17:45:22 As I join the committee, I would like to give the opportunity to ask folks a couple questions regarding the status and their thoughts on the success and failures of mindshare 17:45:44 That being said, we are only 2 (or 3?), so maybe today isn't the day for that discussion 17:46:22 bt0 if you have anything on those topics, I am happy to listen and discuss :) 17:46:28 ask if i can help u i will respond 17:46:39 good 17:48:11 bt0 I am looking for some general or specific statements about your thoughts on the mindshare committee 17:48:31 basically- what do you think it is doing well? what do you think could use improvement? or everything is going great as it is 17:50:18 .hello2 17:50:19 jsmith: jsmith 'Jared Smith' 17:50:22 we are solving the tickets about events fast, at least more fast than the old regional ambassador voting method 17:50:24 Sorry I'm late... 17:50:33 hiya jsmith - no worries :) 17:50:46 that is very good 17:50:50 Just introducing myself here (to peoples I already know hehe) 17:51:04 bt0 that is great! 17:51:11 hi jsmith 17:51:29 jsmith just trying to do a short survey discussion about the status of mindshare committee 17:51:55 if you have any thoughts about success, improvements, or anything els regarding mindshare, would love to hear 17:52:47 Hi 17:52:53 Sorry I'm late 17:52:57 .hello2 17:52:58 x3mboy: x3mboy 'Eduard Lucena' 17:53:01 hi x3mboy ! 17:53:02 also commenting and solving another kind of tickets (hi x3mboy) 17:53:32 hi riecatnor, welcome to the Mindshare Committee 17:53:36 bt0 o/ 17:53:38 Thank you! 17:53:45 hi 17:53:55 Would y'all prefer to meet in Mindshare room next time? 17:54:01 riecatnor: I have lots of opinions, but I'm not sure how much they matter, now that I'm in my last week or two on the committee... 17:54:02 hiya nb 17:54:56 tell us jsmith 17:55:03 jsmith understood, and also I think they could be valuable? 17:55:19 OK, I'll write something up and share it with the group. 17:55:31 That would be great, thanks :) 17:55:57 riecatnor, I will prefer the mindshare room because we can connect via Telegram with the telegram bridge 17:56:04 I'm not sure about others 17:56:59 But I'm pretty sure, that was the main reason we was using that room for meetings before 17:57:04 If there are sensitive issues regarding mindshare, an email or a DM to myself is also welcome. The reason I am starting off asking this is because the change in FCAIC allows for a pause, and a moment to reflect. 17:57:47 x3mboy, yes it's our preferred room 17:57:49 As you all have been a part for whatever length of time, you will know best :) 17:57:58 ok, next time we will go in the mindshare room 17:58:17 :) 17:58:48 Seems that is it on feedback for now. Let's look at a couple tickets 17:59:00 good 17:59:10 https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/172 17:59:53 this request seems fine to me, I will +1 18:00:38 https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/171 18:00:55 cool, we are in limit time to send the swag 18:00:56 jsmith I had the same thought as you on this one. Our established budget for release parties is $150 18:01:08 yes, I will work on getting the swag out to them 18:02:24 yeah the screen rental looks expensive 18:03:25 let's wait for them to respond, though I do believe $150 is the appropriate amount we can give 18:03:53 I vote +1 because we don't have to much release party 18:03:54 https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/170 18:04:27 look approved 18:04:28 bt0 gotcha.. I think the issue there is it sets a precedent 18:04:53 right 18:05:46 Apologies if I moved too quickly on that... anyone else have anything to add regarding 171? 18:06:55 .. 18:07:24 ok we will wait for a response and then proceed on 171 18:07:52 for 170, yes it does seem approved and the event is today, so I guess we will be waiting on a report. I will update the ticket 18:08:40 Sorry folks, I have to run to my next ${DAYJOB} meeting... 18:08:45 https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/169 18:08:56 no worries jsmith - thanks! 18:09:51 hmmmm for 169, no response yet. I will ping on the thread 18:10:08 that one has time tho. 18:11:15 https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/166 18:11:58 this one I spent some time working on earlier today, this is composed of multiple requests, and I outlined the info we need before we can approve 18:12:11 many tickets are linked with this one 18:12:18 I closed those tickets and added all info here 18:12:49 sounds great 18:13:14 Does anyone know if additional info we may need? I tried to be thorough 18:15:04 looks good for me riecatnor 18:15:06 one comment on this is I saw Marianas notation of what we spent last year, and based on this info, we are over projection 18:15:43 That being said, event engagement is a top priority generally so let's see how it shakes out 18:17:16 those are all the current tickets that need review. All the rest are aging and I need to review more thoroughly 18:18:18 Does anyone have anything else they would like to add or comment on? 18:19:16 ok. i will try to take over my assigned tickets :) 18:19:44 bt0 sounds good :) 18:20:44 alrighty, well thanks everyone for attending! As I mentioned, my inbox/irc/telegram is open to any discussion regarding mindshare committee 18:21:08 #endmeeting