05:30:33 #startmeeting i18n 05:30:33 Meeting started Tue Mar 24 05:30:33 2020 UTC. 05:30:33 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 05:30:33 The chair is paragan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:30:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:30:33 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:34 #meetingname i18n 05:30:34 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:34 #topic agenda and roll call 05:30:34 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2020-03-24 05:30:47 .hello2 05:30:48 suanand: suanand 'Sundeep Anand' 05:31:15 Hello 05:31:20 hi 05:31:27 hi 05:32:30 #chair suanand vishal_vvr tagoh petersen epico 05:32:30 Current chairs: epico paragan petersen suanand tagoh vishal_vvr 05:32:41 hi 05:33:50 let's start with today's agenda 05:34:15 first we will discuss about current Fedora 32 development cycle 05:34:20 #topic Upcoming schedule 05:34:25 hi 05:34:45 The Fedora 32 Beta got released last week 05:35:16 aha 05:35:31 Hope some of you already tried to update their working system to this release :) 05:35:44 oops so it did 05:35:45 or you can wait for F32 GA release 05:36:58 #info know more about this release in https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-32-beta/ 05:37:34 next upcoming milestone is for Final freeze 05:37:44 #info 2020-04-07 Final Freeze (starts at 1400 UTC) 05:37:44 #info 2020-04-21 Preferred Final Target date 05:37:44 #info 2020-04-28 Final Target date #1 05:38:09 Still 2 more weeks for final freeze 05:39:31 so try to fix all existing F32 bugs 05:40:24 anything to discuss here? 05:41:02 if not let's move to next topic 05:41:42 #topic Outstanding issue 05:41:58 #info #116: Fedora 30 Bug triaging (pravins) 05:41:58 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/116 05:42:18 hi, really not very good progress here. 05:42:48 #chair pravins 05:42:48 Current chairs: epico paragan petersen pravins suanand tagoh vishal_vvr 05:43:51 today's bug count is 35 05:43:57 hm stil more bugs are there 05:43:57 If each person looks at one or two bugs per week we should be fine 05:44:42 If you have a bug on the list please try to get it off - ie either move to F31+ or close wontfix say 05:44:55 yes 05:45:02 right, i think this is right time to test it in Beta and triage accordingly. 05:45:13 (ie move to the latest affected release) 05:45:20 Yep 05:46:02 all bug owners please go through your bugs and triage them 05:46:24 I have 3 for liberation-fonts, already fixed waiting for next release 2.1.1 minor release 05:47:04 any ETA for this update? 05:47:48 And if you don't have a bug on the list please look at some other bug 05:48:05 vishal_vvr: doesn't that mean the bugs can be moved to later release? 05:48:43 Ah they are, sorry, doh 05:48:55 paragan, by next week max 05:49:06 petersen, yes we can 05:49:19 Please 05:49:19 moving it right away, thanks:) 05:49:22 cool 05:49:25 I can't read 05:49:48 All: we should always have bugs on the latest affected release 05:50:04 vishal_vvr: you should probably use FutureFeature to keep such bugs in Rawhide 05:50:36 petersen, okay will make sure here after 05:50:55 (ah I see my problem was only seeing the first 25...) 05:51:11 cool 05:51:57 I finally changed my default to 50 05:52:36 okay let's move to next topic 05:53:17 #topic No assignee issues 05:53:17 #info #115: Tracker for Fedora 32 Changes (pnemade) 05:53:17 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/115 05:56:10 I think we have completed this 05:56:37 Yes 05:58:16 but terminus-fonts not fixed yet 05:58:49 no response yet. 05:59:09 but I also think we can close this ticket as Changes got implemented already and tested :) 05:59:24 I will close this ticket after meeting 05:59:28 Okay :) 05:59:31 epico: you contacted the maintainer? 05:59:48 Yes, email sent. 05:59:53 thanks 06:00:11 What is the preferred solution? 06:00:54 I prefer to combine the bitmap fonts with the same full name. 06:01:13 aha 06:01:39 I see, actually I meant OTB in base package or old bitmap :) 06:02:03 or was that already concluded? 06:02:17 Given that sub-packaging isn't preferred, we could change otb only in the package to fix issues as a last resort? 06:02:30 aha 06:02:38 Is that acceptable? 06:03:01 There might be some issues having both format in one package but it may be better than current situation? 06:03:07 So presumably it is preferred to have OTB in the base package? 06:03:08 I asked this in the bug, the maintainer didn't reply. 06:03:14 ah right 06:03:31 Yeah almost anything seems better than OTB 06:03:49 Maybe we can try combined as an "experiment" hmm? 06:04:11 sorry typo: "than _no_ OTB" 06:04:45 it is already there. but broken 06:04:47 both choice is okay for me. for compatibility, we put OTB in new sub package. for pango issue, we put OTB in base package. 06:04:51 ah 06:05:13 epico: right - we can only do one 06:05:22 Right, OTB is there and is converted one by one from bitmap fonts. 06:05:32 ah 06:05:48 because of missing glyphs? 06:06:14 Anyway maybe we can take this offline but we need a plan of action 06:06:19 It appears that maintainer's last real activity was this -> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/id?id=2020-399340a9-aaf9-4f51-818c-9e5f6efc26fd&is_raw=true&size=extra-large 06:06:22 I think it is a tool issue. 06:06:40 paragan: thank you - I was also wondering about activitiy 06:07:06 terminus-fonts is better to use combined OTB. 06:07:36 paragan: but need to convert the timestamps... 06:08:21 ah sorry, did not notice that, it was on 7th Feb 2020 06:09:03 Oh thanks 06:09:32 Maybe we should just go ahead then if ndim is busy 06:09:52 +1 06:09:59 epico: you already made a PR, I think? 06:10:07 Yes 06:10:14 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/terminus-fonts/pull-request/1 06:10:27 put OTB in new sub package. 06:10:34 Can one of you please review it? 06:11:08 Then we could build it next week 06:11:15 Or even this week 06:11:37 tagoh: ? 06:11:47 Sure 06:11:54 Thank you! 06:12:03 tagoh: Thanks! 06:12:43 thank you all, having this discussion in detail here. 06:13:23 moving to next ticket 06:13:49 and as we still see work, I will hold closing that ticket 06:14:11 #info #117: Fedora 32 i18n test day (pnemade) 06:14:11 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/117 06:14:43 Thank you all who participated in F32 i18n testday event 06:15:43 We got a good response, around 15 people participated. 06:15:45 Yes 06:15:50 The participants have tested our Fedora 32 Changes. 06:16:09 and other regular testcases 06:16:36 we got few bugs reported in bugzilla which are almost taken care now. 06:16:50 also we saw 11 unique language environment tested 06:18:03 out of those bugs I see 06:18:17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812449 06:18:30 accepted as F32Final Freeze Exception 06:20:37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815510 06:21:27 is this same bug as of above 1812449? 06:24:17 anyway, Testday is completed and closed this ticket now :) 06:24:32 moving to next ticket 06:24:42 #info #118: Docs Beats for Fedora 32 (pnemade) 06:24:43 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/118 06:24:46 paragan: hard to say 06:25:08 petersen, ok 06:25:15 we can check more later 06:25:19 Do other people still see issue with text selection off from mouse pointer? 06:25:24 in F32 06:25:42 paragan: yeah the report is incomplete 06:26:16 We can try to reproduce though 06:26:39 okay 06:27:07 ie off-by-a-line? 06:27:21 Dunno if it was reported - surely?? 06:28:55 you mean this like this -> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/IGI7WS4JA24WGLNJU7OVTZCPH5HQ444U/ 06:32:39 anything more to discuss on this previous topic? 06:33:30 paragan: yes thank you 06:34:20 so about current ticket, Change owners need to submit PR about their Change release notes 06:34:40 if there is anything more to highlight then that can also be reported as PR 06:36:50 let's move 06:37:08 Not sure if there is anything else for the relnotes? 06:39:46 #topic Open Floor 06:39:53 anything to discuss here? 06:41:47 let's close this meeting 06:41:55 thank you all who participated 06:41:58 #endmeeting