05:30:06 #startmeeting i18n 05:30:07 Meeting started Tue Oct 6 05:30:06 2020 UTC. 05:30:07 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 05:30:07 The chair is vishal_vvr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 05:30:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 05:30:07 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:15 #meetingname i18n 05:30:15 The meeting name has been set to 'i18n' 05:30:21 #topic agenda and roll call 05:30:27 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2020-10-06 05:31:36 hello 05:31:40 Hi 05:32:33 #chair petersen priyamgupta_ 05:32:33 Current chairs: petersen priyamgupta_ vishal_vvr 05:33:27 we will wait for few minutes, while others join 05:33:37 hi 05:34:07 #chair tagoh 05:34:07 Current chairs: petersen priyamgupta_ tagoh vishal_vvr 05:37:16 Let's start with today's agenda 05:37:24 hi all :) 05:37:32 #chair pravins 05:37:32 Current chairs: petersen pravins priyamgupta_ tagoh vishal_vvr 05:37:51 #topic Upcoming schedule 05:38:50 does anyone has any Upcoming schedule announcements 05:39:22 Final freeze for F33 starts today 05:39:41 Current Final Target date Tue 2020-10-20 05:40:21 also https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-34/f-34-key-tasks.html :) 05:41:26 Thank you petersen 05:41:50 https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/33/final/buglist 05:42:17 Not very far, looking forward for F33 GA :) 05:42:56 anything to discuss here? 05:42:58 .bug 1816547 05:43:02 petersen: 1816547 – Firefox not using langpacks for localization - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1816547 05:43:28 .bug 1884467 05:43:32 petersen: 1884467 – gnome-tour shortcut keys not working - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1884467 05:43:48 Seems the firefox langpacks issue still there? 05:44:20 I heard the team has been busy with version updates 05:45:12 Actually it might be fixed?? 05:45:14 (hi, sorry) 05:45:22 I just saw the latest comment in the bug 05:45:26 #chair suanand 05:45:26 Current chairs: petersen pravins priyamgupta_ suanand tagoh vishal_vvr 05:45:38 priyamgupta_: can you retest f33 firefox? 05:46:05 okay,sure 05:46:13 thanks 05:47:36 Not sure what is wrong with gnome-tour... something particular about Alt-N it seems 05:48:02 (I reported that one last week) 05:49:14 if nothing more to discuss here let's move on the next topic 05:49:34 #topic Outstanding issue 05:49:42 #info #120 Fedora 31 Bug triaging 05:49:47 #info https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/120 05:50:50 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/120 05:51:03 priyamgupta_, any update on this ticket 05:51:26 As of today 14 bugs present.I will continue with my bug triage activity. 05:52:36 Thanks, good work keep working on it :) 05:52:45 priyamgupta_: any bug to discuss in this meeting? 05:53:37 No as of now. 05:54:02 .bug 1753295 05:54:04 pravins: 1753295 – Pango has dropped support for non-Opentype bitmap fonts - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1753295 05:54:39 with 115 comments :) 05:54:59 Recent comment from - Jan Pazdziora 2020-09-23 05:55:23 We need an update on fonttosfnt 05:56:21 .whoowns fonttosfnt 05:56:22 pravins: Package fonttosfnt not found. 05:56:51 .whoowns xorg-x11-font-utils 05:56:52 pravins: owner: xgl-maint; commit: airlied, ajax, alexl, caillon, caolanm, glisse, johnp, mbarnes, rhughes, rstrode, slaanesh, ssp, whot 05:57:03 pravins, that is xorg-x11-font-utils where it is assigning... 05:57:14 looks desktop team. 05:57:55 Good that the bug finally got assigned to a correct component ;-( 05:58:00 Oh dear 05:58:08 i think safe to move for next release, i hope they will fix it. 05:58:37 i mean, change Version :) 05:59:00 petersen: yeah, agree 05:59:28 i dont know whether this kind of bugs gets discussed in WG meeting. 05:59:41 but if someone attending, good to bring into notification. 06:01:06 Thanks petersen tagoh for the inputs 06:01:16 I changed to 32 06:01:25 petersen++ 06:01:25 pravins: Karma for petersen changed to 5 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 06:01:37 Should we assign it to epico maybe 06:02:03 tagoh: If all that is needed is a backport? 06:02:05 i was thinking same, since its assigned to group. It might get missed. 06:02:27 whot is kind if the de facto maintainer, but yeah 06:03:48 petersen, yes, backport would be great. and then we may need to rebuild bitmap fonts with it. 06:04:21 Let's talk to epico when he is on that - I wish we had already done it... 06:04:32 s/on that/back/ 06:04:43 tagoh: unless you want to :) 06:05:03 pinging whot would be a good first step probably 06:05:30 I guess it is needed for all fedora releases? 06:06:07 true, but we can ignore EOL F31. 06:06:43 it this is getting fixed before F31 EOL, then its definitely good. 06:06:54 petersen, hmm, getting confused. right, epico updated bitmap-fonts.spec to use fonttosfnt but we need a fix in fonttosfnt right. 06:07:33 Yeah I think so, it might not be merged yet? So it is only in his copr perhaps 06:07:57 petersen, it is. see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bitmap-fonts/c/2c4fec66edc8179d5784014d49a137a6bd8015f3?branch=master 06:08:34 I mean the latest fonttosfnt changes 06:09:02 Right 06:09:26 -35 isn't yet even built in rawhide but in ELN. 06:09:35 Oh 06:10:30 We need to bump up a release to avoid a conflict between rawhide and eln. 06:10:51 Well there just hasn't been a f34 build yet, right? 06:11:16 right 06:11:20 Anyway this is a good kind of thing to track also in pagure or under Fonts component 06:12:37 We better move on, sorry 06:12:42 +1 to track. !! 06:12:58 yeah, but happy with this detailed discussion. 06:13:29 okay, if nothing more to discuss here let's move on the next topic 06:13:33 Yes, good to discuss some bugs after a while 06:13:44 +1 petersen 06:13:52 pravins: thanks a lot for raising that one 06:14:06 #topic issues 06:14:14 #info #124 need for a generic fonts component in Fedora bugzilla 06:14:18 petersen: welcome :) 06:14:21 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/124 06:15:17 this ticket is created by petersen, anything to discuss on this ? 06:15:57 Yes 06:16:39 So panemade raised https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9368 06:16:58 paragan I mean 06:17:16 So I think we need some discussion it now... since the ball is already rolling 06:17:44 My naive suggestion is maybe just to assign Fonts to i18n-bugs 06:17:55 tagoh: did you see? 06:18:02 Any thoughts 06:18:41 Yes, i18n-bugs would be good as PoC. 06:19:30 Just for understanding - This component will be use only for common bugs across fonts, right? 06:20:01 pravins: that's right 06:20:37 i think, then this is safe. I dont see, there will be huge bugs will be reported against it. Except packaging or one like non-bitmap-fonts support etc 06:20:41 (the other alternative would be the fonts-sig..... but that really needs to be revamped first 06:20:43 ) 06:20:57 it might be also used for requesting new packaging for a font. but the main purpose may be a generic entry point for bugs which reporters isn't sure where to assign. 06:21:25 pravins: well it is quite common actually - new fonts rfe's etc rendering issues which have not been triaged yet etc 06:21:37 tagoh: exactly 06:22:30 at the moment those kind of bugs end up in "random" components like that one above 06:22:48 i18n-bugs looks good in that case and also triaging them once in this meeting is also important 06:23:01 bcotton asked about examples so we should paste some into our ticket 06:23:11 like triage after 3 meetings 06:23:26 Right we should/have to triage them 06:23:33 nod 06:23:35 some rfe take time though 06:23:55 We can use FutureFeature etc 06:24:31 could also be asked for some volunteers on the list perhaps. 06:26:25 Yeah 06:26:38 We could have fonts-sig in auto CC 06:26:43 One concern on this idea is that it can be similar to i18n we already have. 06:27:01 ah we have i18n component? 06:27:17 yep 06:27:47 Well i18n is more contained within our team, whereas fonts has many people involved 06:28:06 Do we have any i18n bugs? 06:28:45 hmm 17 Closed 06:28:59 Well I admit I had forgotten about the i18n component 06:29:06 Right. well, we just need to advertise it to get more opportunities 06:29:13 Yes 06:29:26 moving NEW bugs there is one way anyway 06:30:05 Can you help to come up with some example bugs? 06:30:12 list 06:30:23 Sure. let me figure out 06:30:28 Thank you 06:32:03 okay lets move onto the next point in this topic 06:32:11 #info #122: Docs Beats for Fedora 33 06:32:16 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/122 06:32:41 This is a tracker ticket to add i18n changes information in docs beats for Fedora 33 release. 06:33:34 one link for ibus is already added into it https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issue/532 06:34:09 I pinged fujiwara to remind him on this 06:34:38 Not sure if there are any other relnotes needed? 06:34:54 If not I think we can move on 06:35:52 okay 06:35:54 #info 119: Tracker for Fedora 33 Changes 06:36:00 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/119 06:36:45 I think we are good here too 06:37:04 okay, lets move onto the next point in this topic 06:37:08 1.5.23 landed in Fedora last week 06:38:15 #info #114: rotate chairperson? 06:38:20 #link https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/114 06:38:57 vishal_vvr, you did a great job moderating the discussions today 06:39:02 This ticket is open from long time, any update or suggestion on this ticket 06:39:20 thank petersen 06:39:35 What do people want? 06:39:38 s/thank/Thank you 06:40:47 if vishal_vvr and/or priyamgupta_ want to continue running the meeting that would be fine I think personally 06:41:06 There was one more suggestion to move this meeting to video conference 06:41:34 (personally I am not a fan for frequently changing the chair but certainly good to change after a long while) 06:42:05 Right that could also be interesting - recently we have so few irc/chat meetings 06:44:28 petersen, third option by merging two suggestions in ticket 06:44:33 rotate every meeting on volunteer basis through all regular attendees :P 06:44:36 vishal vvr : +1 06:45:01 I would rather do that on release basis say 06:45:16 So we would have one chair for F34 say, etc 06:45:19 petersen : I can chair the meeting :) 06:45:50 release basis +1 petersen 06:45:56 vishal vvr :that +1 for video conference. 06:46:36 petersen : yeah. Release basis +1 06:47:30 video conference i feel it is better but we need to rely on some opensource platform like jitsi meet 06:47:47 so other community members could also join 06:47:55 How about vishal_vvr chairs for f34 and then priyamgupta_ can take over for f35 if you wish ? 06:48:22 petersen, yes i am good on that 06:48:40 priyamgupta_, or you wish to continue for f34 ? 06:48:43 What do other feel about video meeting? 06:50:11 Petersen : I am okay with any option,can chair for f34 or f35. 06:50:13 I actually feel irc meeting is somewhat refreshing because I attend so many video calls... or maybe we could alternate or do a monthly video call or vice versa 06:51:00 petersen, +1 monthly video call 06:51:22 Maybe we should take a vote if we want to change from irc to video, or discuss more next time? 06:51:29 Okay 06:51:49 Less people today too 06:52:24 priyamgupta_: certainly good for you to try some time - good learning experience 06:53:52 petersen : Yeah. Sure i will chair :) 06:54:54 petersen, me and priyamgupta_ will continue chairing meetings according once availability 06:55:01 okay 06:55:13 good 06:55:59 vishal vvr : i will chair next meeting :) 06:56:38 okay thank you priyamgupta_ 06:58:09 #agreed priyamgupta_ will chair the next meeting 06:58:44 okay moving onto next topic 06:58:53 #topic Open Floor 06:58:57 I put a summary in the ticket - feel free to add anything I missed 06:59:38 anything to discuss here? 07:01:07 okay it seem there isn't much to discuss here, we already had good discuss in previous topics 07:01:34 if nothing more then let's close the meeting 07:02:12 Thank you everyone for joining 07:02:24 #endmeeting