18:00:02 #startmeeting Council (2021-01-07) 18:00:02 Meeting started Thu Jan 7 18:00:02 2021 UTC. 18:00:02 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:02 The chair is bcotton_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'council_(2021-01-07)' 18:00:04 #meetingname council 18:00:04 The meeting name has been set to 'council' 18:00:05 #chair bookwar dcantrell jwf riecatnor spot mattdm bcotton asamalik x3mboy 18:00:05 Current chairs: bcotton_ bookwar dcantrell jwf riecatnor spot mattdm bcotton asamalik x3mboy 18:00:07 #topic Introductions, Welcomes 18:00:13 .hello jflory7 18:00:14 jwf: jflory7 'Justin W. Flory' 18:00:19 .hello2 18:00:20 dcantrell: dcantrell 'David Cantrell' 18:00:29 .hello2 18:00:30 x3mboy: x3mboy 'Eduard Lucena' 18:00:32 * King_InuYasha waves 18:00:35 .hello ngompa 18:00:36 King_InuYasha: ngompa 'Neal Gompa' 18:00:42 .hello2 18:00:43 mattdm: mattdm 'Matthew Miller' 18:00:54 Good $TIME_OF_DAY folks 18:01:12 yep! happy whenever it is to everyone! 18:01:16 happy new year 18:01:31 .hello riecatnor 18:01:32 riecatnor: riecatnor 'Marie Nordin' 18:01:41 .hello spot 18:01:42 spot: spot 'Tom Callaway' 18:03:30 so many peoples! 18:03:43 okay, let's begin 18:03:55 #topic Today's agenda 18:03:57 #info Trademark requests 18:03:59 #topic Fedora annual survey 18:04:00 #topic YouTube policy proposal 18:04:02 #topic Matrix update 18:04:03 #topic Add the Fedora goal of having complete integrated system 18:04:05 #info Your topics here! 18:04:06 OH NO 18:04:11 whoah 18:04:14 good meeting 18:04:15 O.o 18:04:30 I forgot to s/topic/info/ when i copypasta'ed 18:04:36 but YOLO 18:04:37 I've been there :D 18:04:41 i'm not going to type #undo that many times :-) 18:04:41 spot someone read your tweet 18:04:49 yeah it's fine :) 18:04:57 #topic Trademark requests 18:04:58 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/348 18:05:00 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/349 18:05:21 and possibly 347? 18:05:31 mattdm: the floor is yours 18:05:42 I think the Destination Linux one is in "need info" state really. 18:05:57 Maybe it should have that followup: like, "what exactly are you planning to make and sell"? 18:06:33 In the past spot has worked with mizmo on reviewing third-party items like this 18:06:46 I think the thing to do is to ask them that question, and for some samples? 18:07:05 I yield the floor to anyone else who has opinions on this :) 18:07:22 I might have a copy of the agreement terms we used for the other vendor who went through the review process. 18:07:40 if not, I know who I sent a copy to before I left RH 18:08:09 bcotton_ as Fedora Legal liaison that's probably your problem now :) 18:08:33 but basically, they need to tell us what they want to produce, we need to get a sample before they produce any new item, check the sample for quality, and give them permission to do so. 18:08:40 Do we want to ask them for samples? 18:08:43 we also want something in return for the trademark permission. 18:08:56 depends on what they're planning on making and how, imo 18:09:24 bcotton_: imho, it doesn't really. anything with our logo on it should be quality controlled. 18:09:44 spot, +1 18:10:13 how do you handle if its not a physical object, like shells.com 18:10:22 I like getting a sample before making a heavy investment. But it does slow down the ticket turnaround. I wonder if we could give permission for a small-scale release, like n number of stickers or apparel items 18:10:30 That way, it could also give us a gauge on demand 18:10:39 jwf: if they can't turn a sample around quickly, thats a huge red flag 18:10:58 spot: but in endtimes shipping takes years 18:11:14 mizmo: not as worried about a shipping delay (tracking numbers, yay) 18:11:16 * mizmo still waiting on her nov xmas card order from shutterfly lol 18:11:24 because that's not on them 18:11:28 mizmo: for shells.com we can get complimentary login access to see it in action 18:11:39 any vendor worth doing work with is going to be okay with this model 18:12:16 Okay, so, should I ask for samples to be sent? To whom? 18:12:25 Fedora Legal. 18:12:28 s/I/we/, except I'll do it. :) 18:13:07 and the contract needs to go through Red Hat. 18:13:21 (no verbal/email agreements to use trademark for merch) 18:13:23 via bcotton_ 18:13:25 Does Fedora Legal mean #action bcotton_ now? :P 18:13:29 yep! 18:13:31 * spot shrugs 18:13:58 that is official btw. not in his fpgm role but in addition to it 18:14:11 legal saw his tshirt and was like, well, okay. 18:14:15 welp 18:14:32 Good to know! 18:14:57 So, #348 blocked on a sample 18:15:03 Do we take a vote on #349? 18:15:06 spot, how would this process look for this: https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/347 an individual person requesting 18:15:21 yes that was my next question :) 18:15:25 well, here's my take: 18:15:34 redbubble is notoriously poor quality 18:15:43 not just in the garbage people put on there 18:15:49 but the quality of the goods produced 18:16:02 I'm _super_ happy with the metal prints of some art I got from there. 18:16:13 in my past lives of making merch for events, we would never consider them as a good vendor 18:16:16 I definitely do not intend to just enable it on all of their stuff 18:16:47 I would much rather try to find a vendor where we could have a more direct relationship. 18:16:49 spot, I don't consider them a good vendor, as I put in my comment. This is on a personal level for mattdm afaik 18:17:56 i don't like this idea. 18:18:31 A) it will encourage rather than discourage people using redbubble for Fedora things (see, the FPL does it) 18:18:43 B) we have no way to enforce quality control over the vendor 18:19:59 Hmmm. I'm not sure on A, if we can note that it's officially authorized not _just_ because I'm the FPL 18:20:32 if it was random fedora contributor, i doubt we'd even consider it. 18:20:37 And on B, is it concern with variation from sample to sample? 18:21:22 mattdm: its muddy because there is no direct contract between the vendor and the trademark holder 18:21:54 you can't guarantee that redbubble won't switch sticker vendors or tshirt manufacturers 18:22:00 Ok, so, riecatnor definitely has misgivings too. So, I do have a plan B, which is to use Bay Photo, a high end finishing lab. 18:22:42 I think a better strategy would be to identify what items our community wants that are not being well met and trying to identify a vendor who can produce them for us 18:22:45 It just requires a lot more work from me; redbubble's advantage of course is it can be set up very quickly and provides a one-stop storefront 18:22:46 I think spot makes a good point about looking at the situation if this was a random contributor requesting it. Would we look at this differently? 18:22:55 Probably, yes. 18:23:22 Okay, between the two of you, I will retract this idea and when I get a chance play around with the other one. 18:23:27 Red Hat has established relationships with several swag vendors who would be more than happy to do this for us 18:23:44 spot Yeah, riecatnor is working on that. 18:23:46 i would talk to the Brand team. :) 18:23:46 spot, as I also mentioned in my comment, I am in the middle of this. 18:23:55 I can be patient, sometimes :) 18:24:02 * King_InuYasha snorts 18:24:14 imo, mattdm take the wallpaper you want to print and print it! 18:24:22 riecatnor: ssshhhhh 18:24:24 if *you* want it, do it! 18:24:33 lol 18:24:38 But seriously I also want to make it available to people. But we can talk more about that later. 18:24:52 i don't think there is any concern about people making their own goods for personal use, just the act of selling those works. 18:25:11 yeah and that's where redbubble is problematic 18:25:16 yup. 18:25:29 It is fair game in CC BY-SA :) I think it is a question of access. I anticipate hearing more about what riecatnor is working on to make this feasible. 18:25:32 okay, I'm okay with this. Next up? :) 18:25:37 in the interests of moving the conversation along, are either spot or riecatnor willing to -1 the redbubble request (#347)? because that would be enough to kill it 18:25:43 jwf: don't confuse copyright with trademark. ;) 18:25:51 -1 18:25:58 -1 18:26:17 cool, then 347 is dead 18:26:32 I know – but that's why it is a Council topic :) 18:26:35 and for 348 and 349 it seems like the path forward is for me to request samples 18:27:00 anyone disagree with that? 18:27:11 bcotton_: +1 18:27:20 +1 18:27:23 bcotton_: you want sample shells? 18:27:31 A demo environment would be nice 18:27:35 +1 to 348. hold up on 349 18:27:38 If it was super laggy, might not be a good first impression 18:27:43 I have a demo environment of their ubuntu one 18:27:43 bcotton_: maybe want to see if the vendor is on board with our preconditions (must get samples & approval before any new item with logo is offered) 18:28:04 It's pretty slick although there are some technical issues. 18:28:28 Otherwise, +1 on 348 18:28:41 I'd like to tell them if we're okay with the general concept before they go to the trouble to set it up 18:29:09 #action bcotton to get more information from the vendor on #348 18:29:30 mattdm: well, the samples will cost someone money (them or us), so making sure they are onboard with the logic matters 18:30:36 yes I guess this applies both to hosted environments and to physical merch 18:31:06 For shells.com, it's my understanding that they are mostly or perhaps completely within https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#OEM_pre-loads_of_unmodified_Fedora_software 18:31:08 or could be 18:31:21 well wait no this one https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Virtual_images_or_appliances_with_unmodified_Fedora_software 18:31:24 or some kind of blend 18:32:00 but like Lenovo they'd like official permission just to be clear. 18:32:26 the difference there is the extra clause we added for data in /opt for Lenovo that was not added for virtual images 18:32:26 Also they may need to make some small config changes. 18:32:26 official permission also gives us knowledge of it 18:32:48 and gives an opportunity for tighter relationships down the road 18:33:11 they'd also like to be on getfedora for workstation, which doesn't sound unreasonable given that we have amazon links for cloud/coreos 18:33:31 My take on this is that we should get a list of all changes they plan to make, sanity check it, and approve it. 18:33:42 (and if that list changes, we should redo this operation) 18:34:08 spot: +1 18:34:11 the people behind it are the founders of private internet access vpn, btw, and they've been good open source community citizens (sponsoring freenode, gnome, and more) 18:34:39 that makes sense to me spot 18:34:59 might want a "red hat/fedora is not affiliated with shell.com" or something. question for lawyers. 18:35:18 #action bcotton to contact the vendor for #349 to get acess to a test environment and an explicit list of changes they make 18:35:40 #action bcotton check on affiliation disclaimer 18:35:56 spot: on their end or ours? 18:36:00 ours. 18:36:03 ack 18:36:06 bcotton_: if this goes well, I'd also be interested in seeing if we could have Fedora spins also loaded in there 18:36:10 esp Fedora KDE 18:36:47 okay, i think we're ready to move on? 18:36:56 King_InuYasha: they currently have a number of Ubuntu flavors, so I think they are very intersted in that 18:37:04 nice 18:37:15 wasn't sure based on the request, so hence the ask 18:37:56 #topic Fedora annual survey 18:37:58 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/327 18:38:00 #info Previously, bookwar said she'd draft a proposal for this 18:38:08 bookwar is not here, so we'll leave this for next time 18:38:11 easy enough :-) 18:38:26 #topic YouTube policy proposal 18:38:28 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/323 18:38:30 proposed #agreed The Fedora Council approves of this draft, but doesn't think it belongs as a Council policy. We recommend it to the Mindshare committee as a policy for that group as part of their stewardship of official social media channels. 18:38:38 +1 18:38:49 +1 18:38:51 matthew proposed the above text in the ticket, which seems to be the general sense, but it'd be good to formalize it 18:38:53 +1 18:39:54 x3mboy: are you okay with this? 18:41:43 #action bcotton to ping x3mboy in the ticket and if he agrees to the proposed text (which he appears to) then it is accepted 18:41:51 yelp 18:41:55 wait yep 18:41:57 no l 18:42:02 just for that 18:42:05 #topic Matrix update 18:42:07 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/342 18:42:18 riecatnor is waiting on finance. 18:42:19 mattdm: the people want to know about this 18:42:23 finance is on vacation 18:42:51 things are getting set up :) corporate style lol 18:43:13 #info We are waiting on Red Hat Finance who are recovering from their year-end work 18:43:47 i guess they're mostly taking their recharge this week since they have to work the last week of december now 18:44:03 riecatnor: so we can expect in 3-5 years? ;-) 18:44:16 optimistic outlook ;) 18:44:25 :'( 18:44:25 LOL jk, I am on it 18:44:43 okay, anything on this? 18:44:47 anything else, that is 18:45:37 #topic Add the Fedora goal of having complete integrated system 18:45:39 #link https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/280 18:45:40 #info From vF2F: mattdm and bookwar to find a place to fit “upstream first” and then add in the contents of https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Objectives&oldid=2124 18:45:50 bookwar still isn't here, but mattdm: have you two done your homework? 18:45:58 no :) 18:46:03 it was vacation! 18:46:15 what is "vacation"? 18:47:05 #topic Next meeting 18:47:06 #info The next video meeting is Thursday 14 January featuring Tomáš Tomecek and Hunor Csomortáni talking about source-git. 18:47:07 this thing that bcotton_ does work through, generating work for his colleagues! 18:47:08 #info The next regular business meeting is Thursday 21 January 18:47:12 <3 18:47:22 😇 18:47:39 #topic Do we have anything to announce? 18:47:40 #info This is a regular check to make sure we're communicating to the contributor (via CommBlog) and user (via Magazine) communities 18:47:49 #info We published a readout of the virtual face-to-face 18:47:50 #link https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-council-november-2020-meeting/ 18:48:04 we had a NYE party! 18:48:28 and an end-of-year blog post, which, bcotton_, I really appreciate your help with despite my snarky comments above 18:48:29 I'm ok with it 18:48:36 Holy delay 18:48:37 and yet, it's still 2020 somehow 18:48:39 x3mboy: ack 18:48:43 Almost 50 messages of delay 18:49:00 Fedora Social Hour tonight! 18:49:30 Cool!!! 18:49:35 #info We had a NYE party 18:49:44 #info mattdm wrote a love letter to the community 18:49:45 also, one week left to do community outreach survey 18:49:45 https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/679163?lang=en 18:49:52 #link https://fedoramagazine.org/a-2020-love-letter-to-the-fedora-community/ 18:50:04 https://hopin.com/events/nye-party-with-fedora 18:50:06 #help Fill out the Community Outreach revamp survey 18:50:13 #link https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/679163?lang=en 18:50:51 #info mattdm has been promoted to Distinguished Engineer 18:50:53 #link https://bcotton.fedorapeople.org/mattdm-distinguished.jpg 18:50:57 mattdm++ 18:51:08 lol 18:51:11 hahahaha 18:51:11 thank you 18:51:17 ^^ may have been what i was doing while everyone was rollcall-ing 18:51:27 my children also asked if I was trading my fedora for a top hat 18:51:32 mattdm: congrats 18:51:38 thanks spot! 18:51:55 bcotton_, I think distinguished mattdm might need a curly mustache 18:51:58 I have a new to share 18:52:01 mattdm++ Congrats! 18:52:10 News* 18:52:12 x3mboy, ! 18:52:19 x3mboy: go ahead 18:52:21 #action mattdm answer congratulations messages all afternoon :) 18:53:16 mattdm: congratulations! 18:53:21 what does that mean, though? 18:53:23 When the F33 cycle ends, I will left my seat in mindshare and in consequence from the Council 18:53:31 mattdm: congrats 18:53:54 King_InuYasha, dcantrell thanks! 18:54:41 x3mboy: do you mean F34? (may-ish 2021) 18:54:55 bcotton_: he means when f34 starts, I think 18:55:12 (right?) 18:55:15 Yes, that 18:55:18 that was in november 18:55:40 when f34 is released, then. you know. 18:55:56 the way we have named these things for time immemorial 18:56:02 ok, that's what i figured, just trying to disambiguate 18:56:30 x3mboy, you told me a while ago you would like to retire at the end of the year as you've been on Mindshare for a *very* long time.. so from mindshare perspective you can continue til end of this release or not. Totally up to you :) 18:56:53 yeah same. you've done a lot of awesome things for us! 18:57:11 #info x3mboy intends to retire from Fedora Mindshare Committee at the end of the current development cycle 18:57:12 I will cover until F34 because I will be able to focus on i3 18:57:40 #info x3mboy has done a lot of great work over the years and deserves to take a break for a bit 18:57:53 Does Mindshare have an established process for selecting the next Council rep? 18:57:54 x3mboy++ 18:58:02 x3mboy++ :) 18:58:13 Thanks 18:58:19 Mattdm, yes we have 18:58:22 #link https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/241 18:58:25 we are retiring the marketing seat 18:58:27 for now 18:58:31 cool, I figured. 18:58:58 we are also splitting web & design seats 18:59:00 #link https://pagure.io/design/issue/712 18:59:34 makes sense to me 18:59:44 i guess that means we need to make the web team not a zombie :-) 19:00:08 but we're at the top of the hour, so that's a topic for another time 19:00:19 yes. that's a good topic though. 19:00:31 thanks for running the meeting bcotton_ 19:00:39 bye all! 19:00:42 #endmeeting