15:00:42 <pwhalen> #startmeeting Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting
15:00:42 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Feb 17 15:00:42 2021 UTC.
15:00:42 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
15:00:42 <zodbot> The chair is pwhalen. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:42 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:42 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_iot_working_group_meeting'
15:00:42 <pwhalen> #chair pwhalen pbrobinson bcotton tdawson puiterwijk coremodule
15:00:42 <pwhalen> #topic roll call
15:00:42 <zodbot> Current chairs: bcotton coremodule pbrobinson puiterwijk pwhalen tdawson
15:00:51 <pwhalen> Good morning folks, who's here today?
15:00:54 <coremodule> Good morning, /me is here!
15:00:59 <bcotton> .hello2
15:01:00 <zodbot> bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' <bcotton@redhat.com>
15:01:00 <pwhalen> howdy coremodule
15:01:12 <coremodule> hey pwhalen, bcotton
15:01:14 * pbrobinson o/
15:01:14 <bcotton> good $daypart, everyone
15:01:28 * tdawson is here.
15:01:32 <pwhalen> heh, and a good $daypart to you as well :)
15:01:49 <pwhalen> hopefully everyone has finished digging out today
15:02:34 <pbrobinson> it's not cold enough here to nee to dig anywhere
15:03:54 <pwhalen> we got enough to go around if you want some
15:04:01 <pwhalen> ok, lets get started
15:04:09 <pwhalen> #topic 1) ==== Working Group process and admin  ====
15:04:09 <pwhalen> #link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/
15:04:16 <pwhalen> Anything for admin this week?
15:05:10 <pbrobinson> nothing I can think of
15:05:21 <pbrobinson> anything on test days or do that in f34?
15:05:39 <coremodule> pbrobinson, yes, can we wait for the open floor or come back, im multi-meeting wrangling
15:05:59 <pwhalen> #info No changes.
15:06:06 <pwhalen> #topic 2) ==== Fedora 33 status ====
15:06:15 <pwhalen> #info Latest - Fedora-IoT-33-20210214.0
15:06:15 <pwhalen> #link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=33&build=Fedora-IoT-33-20210214.0&groupid=1&groupid=5
15:06:58 <pwhalen> looking ok here. Anyone hit any issues?
15:08:12 <pwhalen> #info No new issues reported.
15:08:43 <pwhalen> #topic 3) ==== Fedora 34 status ====
15:08:51 <pwhalen> #info Latest compose Fedora-IoT-34-20210215
15:08:52 <pwhalen> #link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=34&build=Fedora-IoT-34-20210215.0&groupid=1&groupid=5
15:10:02 <pwhalen> Looking better, we still have parsec failing in f34, but the systemd-oomd was fixed
15:10:52 <pwhalen> We should also have armhfp images again next compose. Those were failing due to a kernel issue pbrobinson fixed yesterday
15:11:10 * jsmith is here, but having connectivity issues, apparently
15:11:14 <pbrobinson> yes, I fixed a bunch of the parsec but I'm waiting for a new parsec daemon to fix the last bits
15:11:52 <pbrobinson> so overall I think F-34 is branched properly, I need to spin up a couple of images to verify
15:12:08 <pwhalen> #info Parsec fixes in progress, waiting for a new parsec daemon to fix the last bits.
15:12:13 <pbrobinson> I fixed the ARMv7 kernel issue last night and got a build done this morning
15:12:13 <coremodule> okay I'm back, had a 1x1 bluejeans call that went over in time
15:12:22 <pbrobinson> so that should unblock too as of tomorrow
15:12:33 <pwhalen> awesome
15:12:38 <pwhalen> pbrobinson++
15:12:38 <zodbot> pwhalen: Karma for pbrobinson changed to 7 (for the current release cycle):  https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any
15:13:11 <pbrobinson> I've started to look at an updated u-boot to fully support Jetson Nano for IoT and I got a local build completing earlier today
15:13:26 <pbrobinson> I have yet to actually see if it works
15:13:36 <coremodule> that's great
15:13:42 <pbrobinson> but I'm hoping I can push a new build by EOW
15:13:43 <coremodule> pbrobinson, willing to help test that if you need it
15:13:48 <jsmith> pbrobinson++
15:13:48 <zodbot> jsmith: Karma for pbrobinson changed to 8 (for the current release cycle):  https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any
15:13:53 <jsmith> I can help test on the Nano as well
15:14:14 <pbrobinson> coremodule: yep, once I have a new uboot build it will be the same process as before and feedback will be gladly welcome
15:14:31 <coremodule> thumbs up
15:14:42 <pbrobinson> one thing to note here is to stick witl L4T release .4 as the last .5 is a little broken
15:15:00 <jsmith> Oh?
15:15:08 <jsmith> Broken in what ways, may I ask?
15:15:13 <pbrobinson> as in L4T R32.4.4
15:15:55 <pbrobinson> broken if you're not flashing the full L4T distro with the firmware, AKA flashing only the firmware to SPI
15:16:05 <jsmith> ACK
15:16:13 <pbrobinson> I've not actually tried, just got a heads up from NV about the problem
15:17:07 <jsmith> OK
15:17:08 <pbrobinson> tdawson: while you're here and I remember we should also now have OOTB working wifi on the Rock960
15:17:46 <pbrobinson> and I'm working on finalising the rockchips support as part of the UEFI on ARMv7 feature
15:18:50 <pwhalen> that will be nice
15:18:59 <pwhalen> Anything else for F34?
15:19:43 <pwhalen> #topic 4) ==== Fedora 35 (Rawhide) status ====
15:19:46 <pbrobinson> oh and rpi4 support has improved a lot, I'm expecting a new firmware soon that should fix the last of the USB problems
15:20:05 <pbrobinson> I've not actually tested it at all on IoT as yet though so testing there is welcome
15:20:19 <tdawson> pbrobinson:  Ya!! (Sorry, stepped out for a minute)
15:20:29 <pwhalen> \0/ saves me from pestering you about that one  (usb)
15:20:30 <pwhalen> thanks
15:21:47 <pbrobinson> yea, the rpif may have worked out how to actually set a pci bar properly and consistently
15:21:57 <pwhalen> iot rawhide looks like it may need some new needles, will need to look some mroe
15:22:05 <pwhalen> #link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=35&build=Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0&groupid=1&groupid=5
15:22:59 <pwhalen> Anything else for rawhide?
15:23:11 <pbrobinson> not from me
15:23:31 <pwhalen> #topic 5) ==== Open Floor ====
15:23:40 <pbrobinson> test days?
15:23:47 <coremodule> yep
15:24:28 <coremodule> would like to propose either wednesday the 11th of march, thursday the 12th of march, or friday the 13th of march for the beta testday
15:25:07 <coremodule> this is a few days before beta launch, beta launch being 3-16 if we don't slip at all
15:25:34 <pbrobinson> personally I'd prefer not Fri, but I can likely make most of them work
15:25:42 <pbrobinson> to some degree at least
15:26:10 <pwhalen> I like Wednesdays, we can remind people durign the meeting
15:26:21 <coremodule> how about Thursday the 12th? the thought being we will have had this meeting the day before to ensure anything we wanted can be implemented
15:26:37 <coremodule> pwhalen, I'm good with Wednesday too, we can do the same on Wednesday
15:26:58 <coremodule> Wednesday the 11th then?
15:27:11 <pwhalen> heh, yea Thursday is a little meeting heavy for me so I wont be around as much
15:27:14 <pwhalen> wfm
15:27:38 <coremodule> perfect, wednesday it is. I will wait on scheduling the final test day until later on in the schedule
15:27:45 <coremodule> as far as test cases go
15:27:52 <pwhalen> great, thanks for setting it up
15:27:56 <tdawson> I should either be available for any of those days, or none.  But right now, it looks like any of them are good for me.
15:28:22 <coremodule> last week pwhalen you had mentioned some better coverage in PARSEC and zezere. is there a good time I can get with you and/or pbrobinson to write some stronger test cases for use in the test day?
15:28:24 <pwhalen> tdawson: awesome, thanks
15:28:46 <coremodule> preferably in the next week or two
15:29:07 <pwhalen> coremodule: tests need to be written for those
15:29:34 <coremodule> sure, I just don't know exactly how to set them up, so will need some guidance on your part if I can
15:29:35 <pwhalen> The existing http zezere install I never got working. I'll try to fix that
15:30:09 <pwhalen> coremodule: right, thats the part we need to work out
15:30:34 <coremodule> is there a day/time that works for you to get together and hammer some of this out?
15:30:37 <pbrobinson> coremodule: with pwhalen likely the best
15:31:13 <pwhalen> coremodule: sure, we can discuss after the meeting
15:31:18 <coremodule> sounds good.
15:31:21 <coremodule> I have two more things
15:32:36 <coremodule> pbrobinson, last week you mentioned lack of testing on previous test days. Wondering what your thoughts on having a "test day" competition where the top (new) contributor is sent an ARM board to use for testing in the future? some kind of incentive to get people to test. also, if you like the idea, if you have the budget to do so :)
15:33:45 <pbrobinson> I have no budget what so ever, that would be one for mattdm/marie
15:33:59 <coremodule> gotcha.
15:34:31 <coremodule> sounds good to me! okay, /me passes the torch back to pwhalen and stumbles off the stage
15:34:49 <pwhalen> ..wait, that was one
15:34:55 <pwhalen> come back! :)
15:35:04 <coremodule> oh right
15:35:05 <coremodule> whoops
15:35:08 <pwhalen> heh
15:36:13 <coremodule> pbrobinson, pwhalen, QA team was wondering if you guys knew anything about ARM/IoT devices that were shipped for people to use. do you know if they have all been shipped?
15:36:42 <pbrobinson> I believe they were all shipped out last year
15:36:57 <coremodule> pbrobinson, do you know if any pinebook pro's were shipped?
15:36:58 <pwhalen> Same, some of what we wanted wasnt available
15:37:07 <pwhalen> no, they werent available
15:37:28 <pbrobinson> coremodule: no pinebook pros, not available, and also not associated with IoT
15:38:06 <coremodule> got it! That's what they wanted to know. Thank you. /me covers his face and hurriedly walks off stage in shame for not knowing how to count to two
15:38:39 <pbrobinson> the PBP is due back in stock in mid march
15:39:05 <pbrobinson> and I should have one of the early quartz64 devices soon
15:39:25 <pbrobinson> that will be a bit of a longer road due to the upstream status of rk356x
15:39:25 <pwhalen> looking forward to hearing about that one
15:40:48 <pwhalen> thank you all
15:40:48 <pwhalen> #endmeeting