16:01:02 #startmeeting Fedora QA Meeting 16:01:02 Meeting started Mon Mar 8 16:01:02 2021 UTC. 16:01:02 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:01:02 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:01:02 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 16:01:06 #meetingname fedora-qa 16:01:06 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 16:01:12 #topic Roll call 16:01:17 morning, folks, who's around for QA fun? 16:01:45 .hello lruzicka 16:01:46 lruzicka[m]: lruzicka 'Lukáš Růžička' 16:01:55 .hello chrismurphy 16:01:56 cmurf: chrismurphy 'Chris Murphy' 16:02:17 * cmurf runs to coffeefy 16:03:27 .hello pwhalen 16:03:28 pwhalen: pwhalen 'Paul Whalen' 16:04:04 .hello2 16:04:10 coremodule: coremodule 'Geoffrey Marr' 16:05:26 hi hi 16:05:31 how's everyone doing this fine monday 16:06:06 taking some refuge from a rainy day 16:06:43 .hello2 16:06:44 bcotton: bcotton 'Ben Cotton' 16:08:09 hi ben 16:08:10 * sumantro is here 16:08:12 alrighty, let's get rollin 16:09:22 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 16:09:37 .hello2 jbwillia 16:09:38 Southern_Gentlem: Sorry, but you don't exist 16:09:40 "lruzicka to go ahead and merge the proposed audio criteria changes" 16:09:42 .hello jbwillia 16:09:43 Southern_Gentlem: jbwillia 'Ben Williams' 16:09:46 did that get done? 16:10:01 ah, I think not 16:10:14 It sort of slipped my mind 16:10:25 Will do it tomorrow. 16:10:34 sorry 16:10:50 .fire lruzicka 16:10:50 adamw fires lruzicka 16:11:04 #action lruzicka 's replacement to go ahead and merge the proposed audio criteria changes 16:11:28 alrighty, any other followup from last week? :D 16:11:41 wait!!! 16:11:48 I did merge it 16:11:49 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria#Sound_recording 16:12:10 but it was a while, so I sort of lost track 16:12:55 fiiiiiine 16:12:57 #undo 16:12:57 Removing item from minutes: 16:13:02 #undo 16:13:02 Removing item from minutes: ACTION by adamw at 16:11:04 : lruzicka 's replacement to go ahead and merge the proposed audio criteria changes 16:13:02 yeah i know what that's like 16:13:15 .hire lruzicka 16:13:15 adamw hires lruzicka 16:13:20 haha 16:14:20 cmurf: last week, we did not meet. who should keep things in their head for a fortnight? 16:14:54 #topic Fedora 34 status 16:14:55 don't look at me, if i can keep state for an hour i'm happy 16:15:11 so, we have the blocker meeting coming up in an hour to look at what specific blocker bugs we have 16:15:32 in wider terms, 34 seems to be...more or less okay, composes are happening, tests are mostly passing 16:16:00 #info Fedora 34 status is broadly OK, no systematic issues, composes are happening, GNOME 40 is in 16:16:12 i continue to be a little concerned about how OK we seem to be at this point in the cycle :-) 16:16:28 oh don't worry something will go wrong 16:16:51 three days before final probably 16:17:07 there's a plasma/kde 5.21.5 update for f34 sitting in updates-testing and no FE was proposed for it, so for now i'm proceeding under the assumption we're not pulling it in for beta 16:17:24 oops 16:17:35 there's an accepted FE for a single package in it, but we wouldn't usually pull an entire new version of a desktop to fix a single app FE 16:17:56 right, is it intentional or is it an oversight 16:18:09 ok, it seems reasonable. Will it get pulled in further updates? 16:18:13 #info Plasma 5.21.5 is not going to make Beta as things stand 16:18:14 dunno 16:18:20 it'll be a zero-day update as things stand 16:18:28 yeah 16:18:30 noted :D 16:18:41 #info Beta Go/No-Go #1 should be this Thursday, so we will be trying to get a candidate compose done today or tomorrow 16:19:27 there are a few basic/beta level tests which have not been run so it'd be good if people could cover those 16:19:34 remember to check https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/34 16:19:51 #info please check for basic/beta level tests that have not yet been run at https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/34 and help out by running them 16:20:52 I will put the compose testing on my agenda as the number 1 priority 16:21:05 the sooner we have, the better 16:21:09 we have it 16:21:19 thanks! 16:22:20 okay, any other notes on f34? 16:22:46 Southern_Gentlem: I saw your notes about the i3 spin, will look at that a bit later today 16:23:40 adamw, seems that @hardware-support is missing on the pagure kickstart and i3 sig is planning to update that with a PR 16:23:56 for some reasons SG and I local builds were pulling that in tho 16:24:04 * nirik must have gotten schedules crossed somehow... if any mobility sig folks are looking for our meeting it's moved to #fedora-meeting-1, please go there. ;) 16:24:19 linuxmodder: thanks for the update 16:24:24 np 16:24:36 #topic Test Day / community event status 16:24:59 Fedora IoT test day is this Wednesday 16:25:02 So, we had the audio test day which went good 16:25:18 kernel test week is running currently alongside i18n 16:25:40 followed by iot on 2021-03-10 16:25:54 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-10_Fedora_34_IoT_Edition 16:26:25 and then systemd-oomd test week from 2021-03-18 through 2021-03-25 16:26:46 #info Audio test day went off well: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-03_Audio_Test_Day 16:27:04 how much testing of proprietary videoconference apps did we do with the audio test day? that's going to be a big pain point for users if it's not reliable 16:27:05 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-18_Systemd-OOMd_Test_Week 16:27:31 #info kernel 5.11 test week is currently running: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-08_Kernel_5.11_Test_Week 16:28:11 bcotton, I tried basic echo tests with zoom 16:28:24 #info i18n test day is officially tomorrow, but feel free to get started! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-09_I18N_Test_Day 16:28:48 #info then IoT Test Day is on Wednesday: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-10_Fedora_34_IoT_Edition 16:29:18 adamw, one last note, i3 test day and GNOME test day are on the cards, more details to come next week 16:29:34 #info ...and finally for now, systemd-oomd test week starts next Thursday: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-18_Systemd-OOMd_Test_Week 16:29:42 thanks sumantro! it's a busy time :) 16:29:56 adamw, np :D 16:29:58 indeed 16:30:04 I noticed a few of the pages aren't in the f34 test days category, can you check through and add the ones that are missing? thanks 16:30:04 sumantro++ 16:30:14 sumantro++ 16:30:15 bcotton: Karma for sumantro changed to 4 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:30:17 * nirik notes google meet now has a 'test your setup' thing... lets you record a short clip and play it back. 16:30:32 did audio test week hit any interesting/significant bugs? 16:30:33 adamw, I will check and update the main template as well 16:30:45 mobility sig -> #fedora-meeting-1 16:31:24 putting the category in the template is tricky since we do them by release :/ 16:32:04 adamw currently its a part of the template where its f33 AFIK 16:32:10 but i will take care of that one 16:32:21 i think i used to leave them out and do it by hand but there's no good choices, heh 16:32:23 thanks 16:32:50 adamw, on the audio front, there are some bugs reported by folks 16:33:42 lruzicka[m], are we having another test week for audio? 16:34:35 sumantro: I believe we should have one between Beta and Final, too, but not right from the start so that there is time to fix 16:35:09 I would say that mostly it is fine, there are some BT issues -> limited support with some BT devices 16:35:12 lruzicka[m], thanks for that information and all the test cases. I will keep a room for that 16:35:22 lruzicka++ 16:35:22 sumantro: Karma for lruzicka changed to 4 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:35:26 also, some tests could not be performed on silverblue, because the packages were not there 16:35:51 I guess I did not realize that, will need to update the test cases 16:36:23 to make it fully testable on silver blue, too 16:37:30 and also, sometimes devices are not switched to automatically, they must be rerouted manually. 16:38:21 did the missing packages on silverblue seem like a bug or just a choice? 16:39:06 well, maybe 16:39:48 for testing we needed pipewire-utils and pulseaudio-utils, which provide the CLI stuff, but we could skip it on silverblue 16:40:21 however, if routing could only be achieved through pavucontrol, maybe we should recommend adding pavucontrol to a default installation. 16:40:30 there is a way to overlay packages in ostree systems, iirc. 16:40:39 currently, pavucontrol is not installed by default 16:40:44 can the GNOME volume panel thing not do routing? 16:41:54 well, possibly it can .. maybe we should focus more on Gnome Settings, too 16:43:12 worth looking into 16:43:19 OK, thanks again to sumantro for all his work there 16:43:21 anything else on community events? 16:43:44 adamw, nothing else for now 16:43:47 ok, I will test it more and perhaps add this to the test cases 16:47:44 #topic Open floor 16:47:49 any other business? 16:48:48 lruzicka++ 16:48:48 copperi: Karma for lruzicka changed to 5 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:51:13 i guess not! 16:51:33 blocker review is at the top of the hour, so i'll end a bit early to give people time to get coffee 16:51:36 thanks a lot for coming, folks 16:51:51 thanks adamw 16:51:54 thank you, Adam 16:53:49 #endmeeting