#fedora-meeting: Fedora ELN SIG (2021-05-21)

Meeting summary

1. init process (sgallagh, 16:04:02)
   
2. Old Business (sgallagh, 16:05:43)
   
3. New Business (sgallagh, 16:10:05)
   
4. Rawhide vs. EL-specific changes (sgallagh, 16:16:58)
   1. Proposal: The ELN SIG strongly prefers the use of specfile conditionals over the use of an 'eln' branch for packages. (sgallagh, 16:42:00)
   2. AGREED: The ELN SIG strongly prefers the use of specfile conditionals over the use of an 'eln' branch for packages. (+6, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 16:43:15)
   3. Proposal: The ELN SIG will establish a process to request the use of an 'eln' branch, including how such requests are approved or rejected. (sgallagh, 16:44:42)
   4. AGREED: Proposal: The ELN SIG will establish a process to request the use of an 'eln' branch, including how such requests are approved or rejected. (+6, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 16:47:19)
   5. Proposal: Approved ELN branches will be versioned to the EL release and lifecycled with it; the package will reset to building from Rawhide when the next CentOS Stream cycle becomes available. (sgallagh, 16:52:27)
   6. AGREED: : Approved ELN branches will be versioned to the EL release and lifecycled with it; the package will reset to building from Rawhide when the next CentOS Stream cycle becomes available. (+6, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 16:53:44)
   7. ACTION: dcavalca will create a first draft of the policy to request ELN branches (sgallagh, 16:58:26)
   
   
5. Open Floor (sgallagh, 16:58:38)

Action items

1. dcavalca will create a first draft of the policy to request ELN branches

Action items, by person

1. dcavalca
   1. dcavalca will create a first draft of the policy to request ELN branches

People present (lines said)

1. sgallagh (106)
2. dcavalca (52)
3. Eighth_Doctor (35)
4. michel_slm (27)
5. zodbot (19)
6. tdawson (12)
7. tstellar_ (11)
8. cyberpear (5)
9. bookwar[m] (0)