17:00:56 #startmeeting fedora-server 17:00:56 Meeting started Wed Jun 9 17:00:56 2021 UTC. 17:00:56 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:00:56 The chair is pboyHB. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:56 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-server' 17:01:10 #topic Welcome / roll call 17:01:21 hi everyone! 17:01:28 Hey 17:01:31 As usual we should give a few minutes for folks to show up. 17:01:45 Everybody who is lurking, please say either .hello2 or .hello , too. 17:01:52 yea unfortunatly I can't fully attend the meeting 17:01:57 .hello andilinux 17:02:01 andi89gi: andilinux 'Karsten Andreas Artz' 17:02:39 welcome andi89gi even for a short time. :-) 17:03:24 pboyHB thx! First time I attend the meeting 17:03:26 ;) 17:04:53 Hm, maybe we are a small circle of participants today 17:05:09 I'm here. I was a bit late 17:05:11 .hello2 17:05:12 swefredde: swefredde 'Fredrik Arneving' 17:05:54 Welcome swefredde 17:06:01 Thx 17:06:26 #topic Agenda 17:06:34 1. Welcome 17:06:41 2. Agenda 17:06:47 welcome swefredde 17:06:56 3. Fedora Server Release 35 17:07:09 4. Deploying services via RPM and Ansible (continuation) 17:07:22 5. Fedora Server Documentation review 17:07:22 17:07:38 6. Open Floor 17:07:51 Any addition? 17:08:40 #topic Fedora Server Release 35 17:08:44 * nirik is lurking in the back... in the middle of a bunch of things too tho. :( 17:08:57 Work on Release 35 hat started. What do we have to / want do? 17:09:08 welcome nirik! 17:09:15 even in the back. :-) 17:09:38 There is a change in Anaconda. 17:09:43 nirik welcome 17:09:51 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/B4RPFYYDCO2XTQMS4NCP34XXYCXUKWYU/ 17:10:11 What dates do we know about when it comes to alfa/beta/rc1 ? 17:10:45 There is a schedule, but I currently don't know 17:11:16 https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-key-tasks.html 17:11:52 nirik: Thanks 17:15:16 OK. obviously nobody expects any problem from the Anaconda change 17:16:01 Then we have a (longstanding) biosboot bug in Anaconda 17:16:16 #link https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/server@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/UQRHDM2NOKW4VQFQ64UQFGIGGUJGCYXY/#UQRHDM2NOKW4VQFQ64UQFGIGGUJGCYXY 17:16:46 We discussed that some times ago. The bug still exists. 17:16:56 I read the thread. You were active in that i saw ? Will you add any code ? 17:17:42 Adding code of this kind is not my domain of expertise. :-) 17:20:07 Any other idea about this? 17:20:33 .hello2 17:20:34 langdon: langdon 'Langdon White' 17:20:37 sorry for being late 17:20:42 and missing scrollback 17:20:44 Deadline for self contained stuff is July 20th so it's not much time to do anything. 17:20:55 langdon: nevertheless, welcome! 17:21:26 OK. I switch to next topic in a minute 17:22:31 #topic Deploying services via RPM and Ansible (continuation) 17:22:50 we are in the process to detail 3-4 use cases. 17:23:01 That's on ongoing process 17:23:18 One topic we did not discussed so far, how we want to distribute to sysadmins? 17:24:26 the playbooks? the use cases? something else? 17:25:04 langdon: mostly the playbooks. 17:25:54 I hope we can decide next meeting which use case(s) to start to work on. 17:28:04 Hm, any ideas? 17:28:22 Or is it better to first decide about use cases? 17:29:31 i woudl argue for galaxy.. but i would wait til we have something to "argue about".. as in, focus on the use cases and the playbooks.. then worry about distribution 17:29:54 maybe poke the infra team if they have any plan to build a "fedora galaxy" 17:29:57 langdon: +1 17:30:17 Currently distribution is too far away. 17:30:34 Have you gotten any feedback from the publishing of the wiki page? Should it be good stuff there has to be more than 3-4 people involved and also a lot of people wanting the "product". 17:31:11 swefredde: I discussed it with jwhimpel. 17:31:30 But we still have to complete the current ideas 17:32:07 It is probably to much of work in progress at the moment. 17:32:35 I will continue to monitor and raise my hand if I think I can contribute. 17:33:16 Dont have any ideas of my own at the moment. 17:33:37 Let's switch to documentation 17:33:55 #topic Fedora Server Documentation review 17:34:04 Current status: 17:34:27 We have a basic set of articles, most of them already reviewed. 17:34:52 We miss a review of the landing page. 17:35:10 #link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/ 17:35:36 Mayde we can here have look on it and decide, what to change or is it OK. 17:35:49 t's quit short and just an overview. 17:35:54 floor is open 17:36:37 First question: Is the wordinkg ok? 17:36:54 langdon: you are the wording expert here. :-) 17:37:00 any suggestions? 17:37:43 yeah.. i would still like to get back to it.. but weekly meetings are too often for me to have useful updates :) 17:38:29 langdon; agree, I wanted tu suggest to go back to bi-weekly meetings later. 17:39:23 langdon: would you take the review of the landing page? 17:39:47 i will definitely review it... but not sure i can get it done by next week 17:40:08 #action langdon will review the landing page 17:40:37 did we talk any more about "issues"? having an issue assigned to me in pagure makes it a bit easier for me to track my todos 17:40:46 langdon: that's ok. Would be fine to have all pages ready in about 2 weeks. 17:41:22 i would like to make a change request to get our documentation public as soon as possible. 17:41:56 we can't just change it? 17:42:12 I will continue with the Virtualization from a technical point of view. Should be ready to next wednesday, (I hope). 17:42:27 langdon: what do you mean with change? 17:42:47 swefredde: +1 17:43:26 We can change the content of the pages at any time. 17:43:30 no.. like we should be able to just change the source and it should get published 17:43:40 you mean for the "wiki", right? 17:44:31 langdon: wex, we can change the source and it gets automatically published. 17:44:47 But threre is currently no publik link to our pages. 17:45:11 We want to change that and integrate it into the docs start page. 17:45:11 pboyHB: ahh .. yes.. i was kinda just noticing that.. i don't see any for ANY of the editions 17:45:29 i always deep link.. so i am not sure i have every noticed 17:46:06 yes, we want to get part of. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/docs/ 17:46:24 yeah.. im goign to go file a ticket with the workstation team to point this out too 17:47:06 Good idea. We have to promote documentation and really show what we have as Fedora project 17:47:57 The other page currently without review is https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-server/virtualization-vmcloud/ 17:48:05 not just "documentation" but also "the point/existence" of the editions.. we do promote coreos, iot and silverblue though.. its weird.. and seems like a very weird oversight 17:48:49 langdon: +1 ! 17:49:25 I published a similiar text about usage of Cloud image on fedora magahine. 17:49:45 It was reviewed by B cotton and 2 editors. 17:49:58 We can take this as review. 17:50:05 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/225 17:50:57 Or will someone take that page? 17:51:22 if cotton reviewed it, its probably good to go 17:51:59 #proposed we take page about Cloud images as reviewed by fedora magazine editors 17:52:19 3 17:52:24 2 17:52:31 +1 17:52:44 #agrred we take page about Cloud images as reviewed by fedora magazine editors 17:53:20 The last pages are FAQ. and Getting in touch 17:53:36 Let's have a look on FAQ.. 17:53:54 I think it is OK to publish 17:54:21 Of course without the note box 17:55:23 i just see: We have to add the links about SELinux troubleshooting. 17:55:44 copperi: Can you add the missing links? 17:57:15 sure, you can add it yourself as well 17:57:33 #proposed FAQ page is OK with missing links added 17:58:07 copperi: OK I'*ll add it 17:58:28 #agreed FAQ page is OK with missing links added 17:58:29 https://pagure.io/fedora-server/blob/main/f/docs/modules/ROOT/nav.adoc add in there 17:59:32 copperi: I mean a link to the SELinux trouble shooting page. 18:00:21 time is nearly up. Let's switch to open floor 18:00:33 #topic open floor 18:01:08 How do I know if I have agreed to Fedora Project Contributor Agreement ? Can I see it somewhere in my profile? 18:01:24 I would suggest to go back to a be-weekly meeting. one week is too short a timeframe to get requered work between meetings done. 18:02:02 swefredde: it is one of the lines of your first account page 18:02:38 Ok, sorry for "stealing" the last minute. I agree to bi-weekly. One week is a little to short. 18:02:45 swefredde: I'll sent you details via mail. 18:03:14 #proposed Next meeting in 2 weeks 18:03:24 3 18:03:29 you also become a member of a group .. cla or something 18:03:35 2 18:03:43 1 18:03:56 #agreed Next meeting in 2 weeks 18:04:18 Anything else. ? 18:05:48 OK. See you in 2 weeks, or at #fedora-server or mailing list. 18:05:52 Bye 18:05:58 #endmeeting