16:01:49 #startmeeting ELN SIG 2021-10-08 16:01:49 Meeting started Fri Oct 8 16:01:49 2021 UTC. 16:01:49 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:01:49 The chair is StephenGallagher. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:01:49 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:01:49 The meeting name has been set to 'eln_sig_2021-10-08' 16:01:56 #meetingname eln 16:01:56 The meeting name has been set to 'eln' 16:02:07 #topic Init Process 16:02:56 quick heads up in case anyone missed my correction and is looking for the wireplumber meeting - it's over in meeting-1 16:03:13 #info Please be aware that the QA Special Meeting is being held in #fedora-meeting-1 16:03:53 .hello2 16:03:54 jforbes: jforbes 'Justin Forbes' 16:04:57 .hello2 16:04:58 jkonecny_: Sorry, but user 'jkonecny_' does not exist 16:05:21 .hello jkonecny 16:05:22 StephenGallagher: jkonecny 'Jiří Konečný' 16:05:35 thanks Stephen :) 16:05:57 Hello2 only works if your IRC nick matches your FAS account 16:06:33 kk, have to look how the zodbot works 16:06:39 Looks like a small crowd today, but that's not surprising. Between the CentOS Dojo and the lack of an agenda for the meeting, I'm surprised there's anyone here at all :) 16:06:49 #topic Status Update 16:07:32 #info The updated DistroBuildSync is running in production. I am not aware of any rebuild issues with it at this time. 16:07:56 #info Our composes were failing for a week due to a package-signing issue that I finally tracked down this morning. 16:08:12 #info We have a functional ELN compose today 16:08:58 Do you have a link to some ticket? 16:09:11 please 16:09:25 One moment 16:10:46 I don't have an issue tracking it, but the core problem was that we left it out of the branching SOP and when we had some F36 packages start showing up in ELN, they weren't validating properly. 16:11:04 https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/10329# is the MR for adding it to the SOP 16:11:56 thanks 16:12:41 I don't have much else to report on the ELN front today; my work on CentOS Stream 9 took priority for most of the last couple weeks. 16:12:46 #topic Open Floor 16:13:12 I'm happy to answer questions, if anyone has any 16:13:21 I have one 16:13:36 By all means 16:14:05 Would it be possible to get eln added to brew as well? We have an issue now where the ELN kernel will not build on existing internal targets because kernel-tools has some newer deps. 16:14:41 So, for RHEL kernel developers trying to contribute, we either have to get them fedora accounts so they can do koji scratch builds, or figure out some other way 16:15:17 Frankly, I am all for anything that makes it easier for RHEL developers to chip in on Fedora and ELN. 16:15:42 The Brew folks can certainly use ELN as an external repo for a target, but I'm not sure if that's acceptable. 16:16:02 Getting them Fedora accounts seems like it might be a better approach long-term. 16:16:54 I can live with that. I might just need to document that a bit easier 16:17:55 We will probably want to get them into a group with privilege to use Koji as well. 16:18:10 No privs required anymore, just an account 16:18:18 Since they are only interested in scratch builds 16:18:19 Oh? 16:18:34 I thought that still required FPCA+1 at least 16:19:34 seems not. Or at least I asked nirik and was told just an account. Once I had someone set it up and pointed them to the fedora krb page, I didn't get any further questions or complaints that a scratch didn't work 16:19:55 Good enough for me 16:21:05 jforbes: Of course, the other alternative would be for us to start bootstrapping RHEL 10 internally. 16:21:27 Which is worth considering. 16:21:56 I have no opinion on that, I just want whatever keeps the bar as low as possible for people to be able to contribute to kernel-ark 16:23:07 jforbes: I'm curious: are you required to pair-program on the Kernel ARK? 16:23:17 couldn't the boostrapping of RHEL 10 make a lot of confusion between people? Just thinking aloud 16:23:55 No 16:23:58 jkonecny_: I don't think so, as long as they aren't told about it :) 16:24:22 jforbes: (Sorry, I was making a joke about the pair-programming. Kernel ARK vs. Noah's...) 16:24:27 :) ok 16:25:29 Ahh, I figured it was some internal agile thing... My involvment in RHEL pretty much ends at ELN 16:25:58 jkonecny_: That being said, it's a big effort to get the ball rolling there and I doubt the release engineering folks will have the cycles for that in 2021. 16:26:09 jforbes: Nope, just playing off the name. 16:27:24 I don't think we are necessarily at the right point to start the RHEL 10 work, but I figured I'd raise it as an option. 16:28:15 I don't think that is necessary, ELN is really the place for that. We just seem to have a number of internal people who know the internal tools well, but not the fedora ones 16:28:27 In the meantime, the approach that requires the least "waiting for someone else to implement something" is to get the Kernel folks working in Fedora 16:29:59 Indeed 16:30:53 would be great to have them, that is for sure 16:36:35 That was my only item for open floor 16:39:03 OK, I'll close us out then. 16:39:07 Thanks for coming, folks. 16:39:11 #endmeeting