16:01:33 #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting 16:01:33 Meeting started Mon Nov 29 16:01:33 2021 UTC. 16:01:33 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:01:33 The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 16:01:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:01:33 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_qa_meeting' 16:01:38 #meetingname fedora-qa 16:01:38 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' 16:01:42 #topic Roll Call 16:01:50 * sumantro is here 16:01:59 Hey Adam! 16:02:08 Good morning 16:02:44 Good Morning! 16:03:01 Evening gentlemen :D 16:03:14 .hello lruzicka 16:03:15 lruzicka2: lruzicka 'Lukáš Růžička' 16:03:50 good to you too 16:04:21 .hello2 16:04:22 frantisekz: frantisekz 'František Zatloukal' 16:06:20 .hello2 16:06:21 coremodule: coremodule 'Geoffrey Marr' 16:07:37 how's every doing this 16:08:42 cold 21:38:39 16:09:31 heh 16:09:36 alrighty, let's get started 16:09:43 (it's also pretty cold here) 16:10:06 but my house hasn't been washed into the sea yet, so, you know, good point there 16:10:30 #topic Previous meeting follow-up 16:10:37 oh dear, this is going to have something i forgot to do on it, isn't it 16:10:41 cold here, slippery :D 16:10:58 let's just skip to: 16:11:01 adamw, you live on the coast? 16:11:07 #action "adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality" criterion regarding arches" 16:11:12 i promise i'll do it this time 16:11:46 lruzicka2: nah, i'm actually in a fairly flood-safe spot thankfully 16:13:01 #info "adamw to convert retrospective entries to pagure tickets later this week" - this one I did do! and we'll talk about it more later. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AZHTTFG2A33LFODM6MC3EXPVOZTYXVOK/ 16:13:16 any other follow-up? 16:14:33 alllrighty then 16:14:43 #topic Fedora 36 status 16:16:09 still "pretty much a-ok", i think 16:16:34 yeah, tests are nearly all passing, composes are running. anyone have anything to note? 16:16:45 #info composes are running and tests are nearly all passing, nothing seems to be obviously on fire 16:16:56 nothing much on my end! 16:21:49 excellent 16:22:21 #topic Fedora 35 Retrospective proposed actions 16:22:34 so, here's that link again: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AZHTTFG2A33LFODM6MC3EXPVOZTYXVOK/ 16:23:01 those are my proposed follow-ups to the retrospective - basically filing a bunch of tickets, which i'll try and make sure get assigned to people who will do things :) 16:23:09 anyone have notes/queries/suggestions? 16:23:43 I read through and sounds good to me! 16:24:04 you can assign me the BZ onboarding or training guide 16:24:12 I will try to cover that 16:25:50 awesome, thanks 16:26:05 i thought there were some great ideas in there, so thanks for the feedback everyone 16:27:17 adamw, you can assign me to make sure we test earlier in the process - I wanted to take care about it last time, but it somehow slipped. 16:27:28 roger 16:27:32 thanks for volunteering 16:27:50 adamw, also, if openqa should be discussed anyhow, I can help, too. 16:28:39 ayup 16:30:46 alrighty then, moving along 16:31:03 #action adamw to follow through on the proposed retrospective actions 16:31:19 #topic Current criteria / test case proposals 16:32:53 so, we still have kparal's packaging criteria proposal outstanding 16:33:46 adamw, he is ill with C19, so that's probably on hold. 16:33:59 right :| but we can still help 16:34:28 so far only cmurf and lruzicka replied to his 'scenario' post: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BQUOUIZA24XLQEENY4NLDES4MMKIPSGN/ 16:34:41 so it'd be good if more people could reply to that, it will help tweak the proposal when he's ready to work on it again 16:34:46 oh, I thought more people did 16:37:40 not unless i'm missing something, nope 16:38:09 #info it'd be good for more folks to respond to kparal's post requesting input on the package management criteria: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BQUOUIZA24XLQEENY4NLDES4MMKIPSGN/ 16:40:13 any other notes on that? 16:41:19 nope 16:41:21 :) 16:41:52 I am yet to post my notes there, will do that today or tomorrow 16:42:05 alllrighty then 16:42:28 #topic Test Day / community event status 16:42:32 sumantro, take it away 16:42:34 The Kernel 5.15 Test week happened.Here are the results 336 tests run by 96 testers. Of those, 29 tests and 6 testers were for non x86_64 (mostly aarch64). 16:42:46 https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/682#comment-764988 16:42:54 this sums up all! 16:43:18 we will have a few more test day in few weeks 16:43:42 Test List will have the updates :D 16:44:24 #info kernel 5.15 test week went well, with 336 tests by 96 testers 16:44:33 #info more test days are coming in a few weeks as the F36 cycle spins up 16:44:36 thanks sumantro! 16:44:39 #topic Open floor 16:44:41 np adamw! 16:44:50 any other business, folks? 16:46:50 I guess not. 16:47:36 indeed 16:49:00 thanks adamw for hosting! 16:49:06 adamw++ 16:50:07 thanks for coming, everyone 16:50:52 note december is usually pretty slow with RH's end of year shutdown, we may well just have one more meeting for the year or something, so be prepared :) 16:51:40 #endmeeting