#fedora-meeting: F36 Final Go/No-Go meeting
Meeting started by bcotton at 17:01:49 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (bcotton, 17:02:33)
- Purpose of this meeting (bcotton_, 17:04:29)
- Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or
not F36 Final is ready for shipment, according to the release
criteria. (bcotton_,
17:04:30)
- This is determined in a few ways: (bcotton_,
17:04:32)
- 1. No remaining blocker bugs (bcotton_,
17:04:37)
- 2. Release candidate compose is
available (bcotton_,
17:04:38)
- 3. Test matrices for Beta are fully
completed (bcotton_,
17:04:40)
- Current status - blockers (bcotton_, 17:05:03)
- https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/36/final/buglist
(bcotton_,
17:05:05)
- 8 Proposed Blockers (bcotton_,
17:05:14)
- 4 Accepted Blockers (bcotton_,
17:05:15)
- (2079400) upgrade from Fedora 35 fails (bcotton_, 17:05:31)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079400
(bcotton_,
17:05:33)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/789
(bcotton_,
17:05:34)
- Proposed Blocker, dogtag-pki, NEW (bcotton_,
17:05:36)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-1)
(-adamwill) (bcotton_,
17:05:37)
- AGREED: 2079400 -
RejectedBlocker(Final) - The openQA tests succeed and there's
insufficient information to call this a blocker. (bcotton_,
17:15:33)
- (2079356) when deleting multiple events, only the last one is deleted, others reappear after app restart (bcotton_, 17:16:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079356
(bcotton_,
17:16:03)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/788
(bcotton_,
17:16:04)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-calendar, NEW
(bcotton_,
17:16:06)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,1,-3) (+bcotton,
+catanzaro, +asciiwolf, kparal, -geraldosimiao, -lruzicka,
-humaton) (bcotton_,
17:16:07)
- GNOME and the "Default application functionality" criterion (adamw, 17:17:34)
- (2072070) Connection to wireless network fails without explanation when other end does not support secure renegotiation (bcotton_, 17:34:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072070
(bcotton_,
17:34:40)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/729
(bcotton_,
17:34:42)
- Proposed Blocker, wpa_supplicant, NEW
(bcotton_,
17:34:43)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+2,0,-0) (+lruzicka,
+asciiwolf) (bcotton_,
17:34:45)
- Ticket vote: FinalFreezeException (+2,0,-0)
(+lruzicka, +asciiwolf) (bcotton_,
17:34:46)
- AGREED: 2072070 -
AcceptedBlocker(Final) - This bug is a conditional violation of all
criteria that imply network access and any 'install must work'
criteria in cases where an affected WiFi network is used
(bcotton_,
17:50:35)
- (2079356) when deleting multiple events, only the last one is deleted, others reappear after app restart (bcotton_, 17:52:42)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079356
(bcotton_,
17:52:44)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/788
(bcotton_,
17:52:45)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-calendar, NEW
(bcotton_,
17:52:47)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,1,-3) (+bcotton,
+catanzaro, +asciiwolf, kparal, -geraldosimiao, -lruzicka,
-humaton) (bcotton_,
17:52:48)
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HNXF7WCYQ7RAKMNGCIOXCBXERBAK44TK/
is the proposal, the discussion happened the next month (march) and
is mostly people saying "sure whatever" (adamw,
17:58:02)
- AGREED: 2079356 -
RejectedBlocker(Final) AcceptedFreezeException(Final) - This does
not violate the "Basic Functionality" criterion but is worth fixing
if possible (bcotton_,
18:04:02)
- (2079510) Calendar doesn't work reliably when trying to add more than three events which last longer than one month (bcotton_, 18:04:17)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079510
(bcotton_,
18:04:18)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/791
(bcotton_,
18:04:20)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-calendar, NEW
(bcotton_,
18:04:21)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-3) (-bcotton,
-lruzicka, -humaton) (bcotton_,
18:04:23)
- AGREED: 2079510 -
RejectedBlocker - Other testers have been unable to reproduce this
bug and it falls outside of "basic functionality" (bcotton_,
18:10:10)
- (2079198) Editting of an existing contact creates another entry with empty content. (bcotton_, 18:10:22)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079198
(bcotton_,
18:10:23)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/781
(bcotton_,
18:10:25)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-contacts, NEW
(bcotton_,
18:10:26)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+1,0,-5)
(+catanzaro, -bcotton, -lruzicka, -geraldosimiao, -coremodule,
-humaton) (bcotton_,
18:10:28)
- AGREED: 2079198 -
RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This falls outside of
"basic functionality", but is worth fixing if possible (bcotton_,
18:16:40)
- (2079228) [abrt] gnome-contacts: folks_individual_get_personas(): gnome-contacts killed by SIGSEGV (bcotton_, 18:16:55)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079228
(bcotton_,
18:16:56)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/782
(bcotton_,
18:16:58)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-contacts, POST
(bcotton_,
18:16:59)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-1) (+kparal,
+lruzicka, +bcotton, -catanzaro) (bcotton_,
18:17:01)
- AGREED: - 2079228 -
RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This falls outside of
"basic functionality", but is worth fixing if possible (bcotton_,
18:26:31)
- (2079274) Contact deletion is unreliable (bcotton_, 18:26:53)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079274
(bcotton_,
18:26:55)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/783
(bcotton_,
18:26:56)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-contacts, NEW
(bcotton_,
18:26:58)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+4,2,-1) (+kparal,
+bcotton, +catanzaro, +asciiwolf, lruzicka, retiredlake9230,
-geraldosimiao) (bcotton_,
18:26:59)
- AGREED: 2079274 -
Delay Blocker Decision, AcceptedFreezeException - We are gridlocked
on whether the severity of this bug merits blocker status, but
there's unanimous support for fixing it if possible (bcotton_,
18:40:35)
- (2079657) crash happens everytime when I scroll down/up to find a video (bcotton_, 18:40:46)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079657
(bcotton_,
18:40:48)
- https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/792
(bcotton_,
18:40:49)
- Proposed Blocker, totem, NEW (bcotton_,
18:40:51)
- Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-3) (-lruzicka,
-geraldosimiao, -humaton) (bcotton_,
18:40:52)
- AGREED: 2079657 -
RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This bug falls outside
"basic functionality" but is worth fixing if possible (bcotton_,
18:49:18)
- (2069239) openssl in crypto-policy LEGACY supports TLS 1.0, but not its signature algorithm rsa_pkcs1_md5_sha1 (Was: PEAP authentication failure) (bcotton_, 18:53:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069239
(bcotton_,
18:53:21)
- Proposed Freeze Exception, Informally Proposed
Blocker (bcotton_,
18:53:40)
- AGREED: 2069239 -
AcceptedFreezeException - Including this fix on GA images is
beneficial for users of affected WiFi networks (bcotton_,
19:00:11)
- Current status - test matrices (bcotton_, 19:00:27)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_36_Test_Results
(bcotton_,
19:00:29)
- ACTION: bcotton to
nudge Cloud WG on adding some testing coverage (bcotton_,
19:03:28)
- Go/No-Go decision (bcotton_, 19:05:26)
- AGREED: Fedora Linux
36 Final is NO-GO (bcotton_,
19:05:55)
- The next F36 Final Go/No-Go meeting will be
Thursday, 2022-05-05 at 1700 UTC (bcotton_,
19:06:14)
- F36 Final shifts to target date #3: Tuesday
2022-05-10 (bcotton_,
19:06:16)
- ACTION: bcotton to
announce decision (bcotton_,
19:07:26)
Meeting ended at 19:08:26 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- bcotton to nudge Cloud WG on adding some testing coverage
- bcotton to announce decision
Action items, by person
- bcotton
- bcotton to nudge Cloud WG on adding some testing coverage
- bcotton to announce decision
People present (lines said)
- bcotton_ (148)
- adamw (146)
- sgallagh (103)
- lruzicka (62)
- nirik (59)
- mhroncok (26)
- Southern_Gentlem (26)
- jednorozec (21)
- copperi[m] (21)
- coremodule (19)
- sumantro (19)
- zodbot (18)
- mboddu (17)
- bcotton (5)
- VipulSiddharth[m (2)
- frantisekz (2)
- geraldosimiao (1)
- neverpanic (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.4.