17:30:18 #startmeeting Mindshare 17:30:18 Meeting started Wed Mar 13 17:30:18 2019 UTC. 17:30:18 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:30:18 The chair is bexelbie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:30:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:30:18 The meeting name has been set to 'mindshare' 17:30:18 #chair jsmith sumantrom robyduck nb x3mboy bt0dotninja mleonova bex bexelbie bt0 17:30:18 Current chairs: bex bexelbie bt0 bt0dotninja jsmith mleonova nb robyduck sumantrom x3mboy 17:30:18 #topic Roll Call 17:30:18 .hello bex 17:30:19 bexelbie: bex 'Brian (bex) Exelbierd' 17:30:36 nb if we need to let me know - I am just following my calendar :) 17:30:49 well not let me know - let the group know 17:30:50 typo sorry 17:33:17 hi 17:34:10 #topic Agenda 17:34:10 Proposed: Tickets: 100 and then Open Floor 17:34:10 Any suggested additions or modifications? 17:34:39 +1 17:35:29 #topic #100 NA Ambassador - Red Hat Summit 2019 - Request for Funding. 17:35:29 #link https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/100 17:35:48 Right now we don't really ahve anything to vote on 17:36:01 however, I think we need to think about this one a bit without regards to the money 17:36:20 WDYT about funding someone to attend RH Summit? 17:36:51 I have opinions, but I'd like to not influence y'all's thoughts - especially those of you who don't also work for RH 17:37:44 bexelbie, I would like to hear them 17:38:25 * bexelbie wants to hear from nb and @bt0dotninja first if possible 17:38:33 and you too sumantro :P 17:38:35 hi 17:38:37 but after them if you don't mind 17:38:54 actually they are active fedora contributors for me is fine 17:39:12 bexelbie, we historically haven't funded people because we had enough people already there to work our booth 17:40:17 * nb is not necessarily opposed 17:40:33 In general, we have the FPL, FCAIC and often the FPgM there along with many other RH employed Fedora contributors 17:40:56 I am a bit conflicted in my opinions 17:41:08 I think it is good to fund a variety of people 17:41:33 but the budget side of me thinks if we already have plenty of people that we don't have to fund, then we might not should spend budget on getting more people there 17:41:45 but since he is already going to be there and just needs hotel....... maybe? does he have a cost estimate? 17:42:09 I think it is good to have non-RH people at our tables also, so people don't get the impression that Fedora is just RH employees 17:43:23 What I am hearing you say, nb, is that we might want to fund people who just need partial funding and are already scheduled to be at RH Summit - but we don't normally fund because we have so many folks there already\ 17:43:26 is that right? 17:43:59 it's a fair point 17:44:25 bexelbie, yeah, i think so 17:44:36 i concur with nb 17:45:43 @bt0dotninja? 17:45:59 sounds very fair the nb pov 17:46:06 cool 17:46:13 this basically mirrors my own thoughts as well 17:46:35 I am going to coordinate with mattdm about what our booth conversation points are and then continue talking with David about his comfort with the message 17:46:43 any other thoughts? 17:47:00 nopes 17:47:25 #topic Open Floor 17:47:48 my laptop died on Monday so I ahven't had a chance to go through the "needs event reports" and do follow ups 17:48:14 I got funding approved at work for SELF so I won't need to ask for an increase to it's budget 17:48:25 when I got the event approved initially i wasn't sure 17:48:34 i can do it bex 17:48:45 i can help you bex with that 17:49:39 @bt0dotninja and sumantro that would be awesome-sauce 17:49:40 thank you! 17:49:44 nb that is fantastic 17:49:53 :) 17:52:13 anything else? 17:52:49 not from my side 17:53:11 .hello 17:53:20 Sorry I'm late 17:53:26 I will keep up in tickets 17:54:08 x3mboy there are no votes :D 17:54:25 just a conversation around ticket 100 please read it and offer any opinions when we get to the voting or by email 17:54:33 thank you all - short meeting :D 17:54:36 #endmeeting