17:38:49 <riecatnor> #startmeeting Mindshare weekly meeting
17:38:49 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Apr  1 17:38:49 2020 UTC.
17:38:49 <zodbot> This meeting is logged and archived in a public location.
17:38:49 <zodbot> The chair is riecatnor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:38:49 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
17:38:49 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'mindshare_weekly_meeting'
17:39:05 <riecatnor> hey folks, how's everyone doing today?
17:39:38 <hhlp> great and you
17:40:20 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Fine thanks
17:41:02 <riecatnor> Pretty good today, the sun is actually out :)
17:42:45 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> :)
17:42:53 <riecatnor> Curious if people care to discuss the git forge situation
17:44:27 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> I'm a little away from that discussion; I love pagure but if the decision is migrate inwill migrate all the repos
17:44:39 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> (edited) I'm a little away from that discussion; I love pagure but if the decision is migrate I will migrate all the repos
17:45:24 <riecatnor> to me it isn't clear if staying with pagure is an option for some teams or repos
17:48:07 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Right
17:48:58 <riecatnor> I posted this on council-discuss if anyone has more thoughts about where to go from here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2JXE3GOMER2VQLYDACG2YDE46YR5GB2O/
17:49:23 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Thanks for sharing, I will read it
17:50:00 <riecatnor> it's short :)
17:51:39 <riecatnor> anyways
17:51:49 <riecatnor> doesn't seem like there is more?
17:52:02 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Not really
17:52:27 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> I don't update the metrics script on two weeks
17:52:47 <riecatnor> Oh, I see jwf made some comments on a couple tickets
17:53:23 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Yeah
17:53:24 <riecatnor> I was curious about the metrics script, can it do things like determine the top 500 contributors, for example?
17:53:49 <riecatnor> Or is it more unique info grabbed about specific accounts
17:54:05 <hhlp> second option
17:54:09 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> The second one right now
17:54:13 <hhlp> :)
17:54:27 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> I can get those metrics in a second iteration
17:54:31 <riecatnor> gotcha
17:54:38 <riecatnor> that would be really helpful to me :)
17:54:44 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Sure
17:56:55 <nb> hi
17:57:01 <riecatnor> hiya nb
17:57:17 <nb> I wish we would stay with pagure, but I guess I understand the reasoning
17:59:51 <misc> well, using a SaaS where people pay by user and month seems like setting incentive against growing the community
18:00:04 <riecatnor> nb, I feel the same too. I have become attached as well. Every reason they have provided seems to have some valid basis
18:00:19 <riecatnor> misc, do you know that will be the solution?
18:01:04 <misc> riecatnor: reading the thread, it seems that the idea is to delegate hosting
18:01:26 <misc> and the only free option mean having 2 accounts for everybody
18:01:54 <riecatnor> that doesn't seem like a reasonable solution, and I don't think the CPE team would implement that
18:02:08 <misc> yeah
18:03:15 <riecatnor> I also can't imagine a situation where we would pay by user in this broad of an instance
18:03:25 <riecatnor> I would avoid conjecture
18:06:25 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Yeah
18:07:27 <riecatnor> there are 3 new tickets surrounding advocates
18:08:09 <riecatnor> https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/194
18:08:16 <riecatnor> https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/195
18:08:24 <riecatnor> https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/196
18:09:19 <riecatnor> 194: refer advocates to mindshare mailing list instead of ambassadors
18:09:31 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> #194 looks like a great idea for me
18:09:44 <hhlp> +1
18:10:12 <riecatnor> Yeah, I am +1 to this.
18:10:14 <riecatnor> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/mindshare-committee/advocate/
18:10:23 <riecatnor> here it needs to say something different under Joining
18:10:50 <riecatnor> 195 is semi related
18:11:02 <riecatnor> is there an advocate FAS group?
18:11:43 <hhlp> it seen exist but with a few people only 10 or something
18:12:21 <hhlp> I read somewhere in the ticket
18:12:25 <riecatnor> I think jwf is just referring to the badge, if I look on the FAS account system, I see no group under advocates
18:12:38 <riecatnor> oh, nope I see it
18:12:42 <riecatnor> I searched wrong :P
18:12:48 <hhlp> yes :)
18:12:58 <riecatnor> owner is nb :)
18:13:24 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> I am a sponsor of that has group
18:13:33 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> *fas
18:14:03 <riecatnor> ok, great
18:14:06 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Thanks nb
18:14:23 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> I will document it
18:14:36 <riecatnor> so to become an advocate, do you run an event and then request to be a part of the team? or vice versa
18:14:42 <riecatnor> how does that work
18:16:18 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Actually, it's not clear so I need to do some research
18:18:09 <riecatnor> ok, thanks bt0
18:18:21 <riecatnor> I appreciate you!
18:19:05 <riecatnor> bt0, if you gather the process formally, we can probably tackle all 3 of these tickets at next weeks meeting
18:19:18 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Cool
18:19:31 <riecatnor> :)
18:19:51 <riecatnor> alright folks, open floor for any other topics
18:21:25 <tg-fedmindshare> <b​t0dotninja> Nothing from me
18:21:36 <hhlp> not from my side
18:22:14 <riecatnor> I hope everyone is holding up okay with life adjustments due to coronavirus
18:22:25 <hhlp> thx
18:22:43 <riecatnor> Have a great day, folks!
18:22:49 <riecatnor> #endmeeting