15:00:25 <kkeithley> #startmeeting
15:00:25 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed May  7 15:00:25 2014 UTC.  The chair is kkeithley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:25 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:33 <kkeithley> rollcall
15:00:50 * lalatenduM_ is here
15:00:58 * jarrpa is here
15:01:10 * purpleidea is here
15:01:49 * atinmu is here
15:02:09 * xavih is here
15:02:27 * ira is here.
15:03:00 <kkeithley> one more minute then we'll get started
15:03:25 <jdarcy> Boo.
15:03:26 <lalatenduM_> JustinClift, ^^
15:04:15 * kkeithley is chairing the meeting because Justin had to be somewhere else
15:04:44 <kkeithley> #topic docs for 3.5.1
15:04:59 <kkeithley> might be a short meeting.
15:05:10 <kkeithley> Anyone have anything to report on docs for 3.5.1?
15:05:23 <dbruhn> here
15:05:49 <kkeithley> anyone know if there's been anything new added?
15:06:19 <kkeithley> any suggestions for how we move this along?
15:06:41 <kkeithley> we don't want to have to hold up 3.5.1 like we did for 3.5.0
15:07:03 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, we should hod on till docs are in, thats was the plan
15:07:12 <kkeithley> exactly
15:07:36 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, may be we need to find out what doc is in , what not
15:08:04 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, and plan accordingly to get them in
15:08:12 <kkeithley> do we have list of things we need docs for?
15:08:47 <kkeithley> anybody?
15:08:49 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, we have created bugs for each doc req and the tracker bug is dependent on these bugs
15:09:06 <kkeithley> what is the tracker bug?
15:09:21 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, tracker bug for 3.5.1,
15:09:30 <lalatenduM_> dont have the id right now
15:09:36 <atinmu> lalatenduM_, In that case tracker bug can easily identify the progress
15:09:47 * lalatenduM_ checking for the bug id
15:09:58 <kkeithley> and bugzilla is so speedy
15:10:31 <purpleidea> i have been using python-bugzilla for some things. useful but not feature complete
15:11:17 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, here it is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071800
15:11:18 <glusterbot> Bug 1071800: unspecified, unspecified, ---, ndevos, ASSIGNED , 3.5.1 Tracker
15:11:46 <lalatenduM_> this would give more info (tree view) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1071800&hide_resolved=1
15:11:48 <glusterbot> Title: Dependency tree for Bug 1071800 (at bugzilla.redhat.com)
15:11:51 <kkeithley> #info tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071800
15:11:52 <glusterbot> Bug 1071800: unspecified, unspecified, ---, ndevos, ASSIGNED , 3.5.1 Tracker
15:12:08 <kkeithley> okay, moving on
15:12:17 <kkeithley> #topic 3.5.1 release
15:12:25 <kkeithley> ndevos is not here.
15:12:55 <kkeithley> last week we tentatively set an alpha or beta release date of 14 May.
15:13:08 <kkeithley> anything else on 3.5.1?
15:13:32 <kkeithley> don't all speak up at once
15:13:40 <kkeithley> okay, moving on
15:13:47 <kkeithley> #topic 3.4.4 release
15:14:39 <kkeithley> #info tracker bug  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095324
15:14:41 <glusterbot> Bug 1095324: unspecified, unspecified, ---, kkeithle, ASSIGNED , Release 3.4.4 tracker
15:15:06 <kkeithley> I need reviews on the two patches.
15:15:30 <kkeithley> anything else?
15:16:32 <kkeithley> for the record, 3.4.4 is small, I'm thinking we'll jump right to a beta release. GA a couple weeks later?
15:16:41 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, so we will try to 3.4.4 to Ubuntu Main?
15:16:53 <lalatenduM_> then it should have all cppcheck fix
15:17:18 <kkeithley> cppcheck fix is http://review.gluster.org/7583
15:17:20 <glusterbot> Title: Gerrit Code Review (at review.gluster.org)
15:17:56 <lalatenduM_> we should wait for this patch to merge
15:18:11 <kkeithley> yes, that's one of the two blocker bugs
15:18:19 <lalatenduM_> kkeithley, cool
15:18:41 <kkeithley> did everyone get the link to the agenda in google docs?
15:18:56 <lalatenduM_> yes
15:18:58 <purpleidea> kkeithley: yes
15:18:59 <atinmu> kkeithley, yes
15:19:17 <kkeithley> okay, anything else on 3.4.4?
15:19:34 <kkeithley> moving on
15:19:44 <kkeithley> #topic 3.6
15:20:15 <kkeithley> vbellur is off at the dentist. Anyone else have anything on 3.6?
15:20:30 <purpleidea> one question
15:20:51 <purpleidea> can the erasure coding code from ceph be useful to gluster ?
15:21:10 <purpleidea> xavih: maybe you know?
15:21:51 <jdarcy> Trivially so, if we decide "GlusterFS over RADOS" is a workable idea.  Otherwise, I think it's hard to tell.
15:22:00 <xavih> purpleidea: I don't know how ceph implements it...
15:23:09 <kkeithley> okay, nothing else on 3.6, moving on
15:23:34 <kkeithley> #topic failing regressions tests on rackspace vms
15:23:44 <kkeithley> and JustinClift is not here
15:24:48 <kkeithley> which leads us to other items
15:24:54 <kkeithley> #topic other items
15:25:04 <kkeithley> open floor
15:25:22 <kkeithley> anyone?
15:25:49 <purpleidea> one little thing
15:25:59 <kkeithley> go for it
15:26:11 <purpleidea> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094857 if anyone knows about who to ask for this... it's more related to puppet-gluster than gluster directly
15:26:13 <glusterbot> Bug 1094857: high, unspecified, ---, josef, NEW , btrfs-progs should support setting the UUID
15:26:30 <purpleidea> i started working on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094860
15:26:32 <glusterbot> Bug 1094860: unspecified, unspecified, ---, jshubin, NEW , Puppet-Gluster should support building btrfs bricks
15:26:36 <purpleidea> which is blocked on the first one...
15:27:32 <kkeithley> I can probably help with this off-line
15:27:40 <purpleidea> kkeithley: great!
15:28:02 <kkeithley> anything else then?
15:28:37 <kkeithley> do I hear a motion to adjourn?
15:29:01 <kkeithley> I believe I do. meeting adjourned
15:29:30 <kkeithley> #endmeeting