12:04:28 <kkeithley_> #startmeeting
12:04:28 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Aug 27 12:04:28 2014 UTC.  The chair is kkeithley_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:04:28 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
12:04:34 <kkeithley_> #topic roll call
12:04:36 <hagarth> kkeithley_: maybe the first AI for today :)
12:04:39 * hagarth is here
12:04:44 * pranithk is here
12:04:53 * ndevos is present
12:05:13 * kshlm here
12:06:24 * kkeithley_ thinks there are more people here than that
12:06:37 * atinmu is here
12:06:43 <davemc> I'm here
12:06:56 <davemc> for the first time, I admit
12:07:00 <kkeithley_> welcome
12:07:01 <hagarth> davemc: would you want to introduce yourself?
12:07:11 <davemc> sure:
12:07:50 <davemc> I'm dave mcallister, in my second week with red hat
12:08:14 <jdarcy> davemc: welcome to the party
12:08:16 <davemc> I'll be taking over the Gluster community efforts from John Mark
12:08:32 <pranithk> davemc: Lot of work we have :-)
12:08:35 <davemc> and working with Big Data community as it evolves
12:08:45 <hagarth> davemc: yay! glad to have you with us here..
12:08:55 <davemc> started with Linux in 1994 at SGI
12:09:06 <davemc> released XFS into open source in 98
12:09:16 <davemc> and most recently with Adobe.
12:10:05 <davemc> and since it's 5AM, I'll _try_ to be coherent
12:10:20 <kkeithley_> welcome to the team. Any plans to get over to BLR any time soon?
12:10:26 <kkeithley_> Or Westford
12:10:40 <davemc> not yet, but planning calendar even as we speak
12:10:49 <davemc> it's in the high priority list
12:10:49 <hagarth> davemc: ow, we probably should have one more community poll to determine time for this meeting. We don't want to wake you up at 5 AM every week!
12:11:04 <pranithk> davemc: Which office do you work out of?
12:11:10 <davemc> well, since I thought it was 4 AM, I'm pretty happy
12:11:41 <davemc> I'm remote, in silicon valley. Mountain View is about 10 miles though
12:12:26 <kkeithley_> ready to move on to the next topic?
12:12:33 <hagarth> davemc: it might get to 4 am when we fall behind to DST. Let us figure out a time that works better for everybody.
12:12:51 <pranithk> hagarth: +1
12:12:51 <kkeithley_> #topic Action Items from previous meeting
12:13:09 <kkeithley_> sorry to cut you off,
12:13:11 <hagarth> #action hagarth to review community meeting slot
12:13:27 <davemc> hagarth: np
12:13:34 <kkeithley_> #topic bug triage email.  lalatenduM?
12:14:02 <kkeithley_> I think it was done and we had our first meeting yesterday
12:14:16 <hagarth> kkeithley_: right, that did go out on the ML
12:14:32 <kkeithley_> #topic Gluster consultants and suspport page.  JustinClift?
12:15:02 <hagarth> that is still TBD afaiu
12:15:08 <kkeithley_> No Justin, probably no page yet, I think
12:15:11 <davemc> JustinClift I can help with this
12:15:36 <kkeithley_> #action davemc to help Justin with consultants and support pages
12:15:57 <kkeithley_> #topic leaderboard stats blog, Justin again
12:16:18 <kkeithley_> nothing...
12:16:30 <kkeithley_> #topic Tamas Papp
12:16:41 <kkeithley_> Justin again, agenda says email was sent
12:17:27 <kkeithley_> #topic verify status of patches for 3.5.3 and request reviews in master
12:17:45 <kkeithley_> ndevos, mostly done? Are you still waiting for something from me?
12:17:55 <ndevos> kkeithley_: nothing from you
12:18:02 <kkeithley_> kewl
12:18:10 <ndevos> email sent yesterday, not sure if anyone did a review/patch/backport/..
12:18:31 <hagarth> ndevos: we probably should track the status of this in next week's meeting
12:18:51 <ndevos> http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2014-August/042051.html for the interested
12:19:30 <kkeithley_> #topic DHT backport 3.5.3->3.4.6  https://bugzilla.redhat.com:443/show_bug.cgi?id=1116150,  https://bugzilla.redhat.com:443/show_bug.cgi?id=1117851
12:19:31 <glusterbot> Bug 1116150: high, unspecified, ---, nsathyan, POST , [DHT:REBALANCE]: Rebalance failures are seen with error message  " remote operation failed: File exists"
12:19:32 <glusterbot> Bug 1117851: high, unspecified, ---, jdarcy, MODIFIED , DHT :- data loss - file is missing on renaming same file from multiple client at same time
12:19:33 <ndevos> hagarth: I'll try to update the status before every weekly meeting :)
12:19:41 <kkeithley_> that's me, it's not done yet
12:19:46 <hagarth> ndevos: ok :)
12:19:57 <kkeithley_> guess I should move it to the top of my list
12:20:16 <kkeithley_> #topic add branch checking to rh-bugs
12:20:19 <kkeithley_> ndevos?
12:20:36 <ndevos> active and working fine, mostly
12:20:36 <kkeithley_> are we ready to start enforcing?
12:20:52 <ndevos> tere are some strange branches that trigger errors
12:20:58 <jdarcy> Going back one item, who's responsible for backports?  Original authors?  Release maintainers?
12:21:28 <hagarth> jdarcy: primarily the authors I think .. release maintainers can work with the authors to make it happen?
12:22:12 <ndevos> jdarcy: I'd say it depends, simple fixes can be done by the release maintainers, but more complex ones should probably be done by the original authors or component maintainers
12:22:13 <kkeithley_> sometimes I do the backport, if it's easy. Usually it's easier than to nag a dev that's 12 timezones away
12:22:26 <kkeithley_> or 10.5
12:23:13 * jdarcy will take a look at 1117851, but there are a couple of others that are related.
12:23:44 <kkeithley_> #action jdarcy will take a look at 1117851
12:23:58 <hagarth> jdarcy: right, I will also request Raghavendra to send backports of all relevant patches for dht.
12:24:00 <ndevos> jdarcy: check with Nithya, I think work is already under way
12:24:14 <jdarcy> OK< cool.
12:24:47 <kkeithley_> any more on who does the backports?
12:24:59 * lalatenduM was trapped in a meeting :(. Here now
12:25:12 <hagarth> kkeithley_: guess not
12:25:46 <kkeithley_> back to "are we ready to enforce branch checking in rh-bugs?
12:26:07 <ndevos> ah, do we have a list of branches that we use in gerrit?
12:26:16 <hagarth> ndevos: what branches yield errors?
12:26:24 <ndevos> I think there is a branch for dht-fixes, and that trips the script a little
12:26:40 <hagarth> ndevos: I think we should just look at "master" and release-* branches in your script
12:26:48 <hchiramm> ndevos,  http://review.gluster.org/#/admin/projects/glusterfs,branches
12:27:19 <ndevos> hagarth: ah, cool!
12:27:30 <kkeithley_> and have we updated the web page accordingly?
12:27:34 <ndevos> hagarth: yeah, I was thinking about doing that, that should be easy enough
12:28:06 <ndevos> kkeithley_: which web page?
12:28:46 <kkeithley_> dunno, action item from previous meeting says "ndevos when we know how to update the webpage, add a pointer to proposed features for new contributors"
12:28:55 <kkeithley_> was that for branch checking or something else?
12:29:03 <ndevos> something else :)
12:29:04 <hchiramm> dont think so :)
12:29:11 <kkeithley_> okay
12:29:35 <kkeithley_> hmm, real-time edits to the agenda ftw
12:29:36 <ndevos> #action ndevos only have the master and release-* branches check for correct bug/versions - enable enforcing
12:30:03 <kkeithley_> are we agreed that branch checking starts to be enforced?
12:30:23 <hagarth> +1 from me
12:30:36 <pranithk> kkeithley_: +1
12:30:42 <ndevos> I think so, there have not been any incorrect errors, except for the dht-fixes branch
12:30:54 <kkeithley_> ETA?
12:31:01 <kkeithley_> later today, tomorrow?
12:31:07 <ndevos> later today should work
12:31:48 <kkeithley_> #agreed. branch checking will be enforced in rh-bugs, effective later today
12:32:23 <kkeithley_> same bug on different branches now requires separate bugs in bugzilla
12:33:09 <kkeithley_> #topic, features for new contributors web page
12:33:15 <kkeithley_> agenda says still tbd
12:33:46 <kkeithley_> I guess that's still accurate
12:33:49 <hagarth> right
12:33:56 <ndevos> hmm, I did not add the TBD, but yes, thats correct
12:34:16 <ndevos> although I've added a list of proposed features to the wiki, and others have extended it
12:34:33 <ndevos> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features#Proposed_Features.2FIdeas
12:34:57 <kkeithley_> #topic karmabot for #gluster-meeting
12:35:06 <pranithk> kkeithley_++
12:35:07 <ndevos> JoeJulian++ fixed it
12:35:07 <glusterbot> pranithk: kkeithley_'s karma is now 1
12:35:13 <hchiramm> done.. Thanks JoeJulian++
12:35:21 <pranithk> JoeJulian++
12:35:22 <glusterbot> pranithk: JoeJulian's karma is now 2
12:35:30 <kkeithley_> <montyburns>excellent</montyburns>
12:35:32 <hagarth> JoeJulian++
12:35:33 <glusterbot> hagarth: JoeJulian's karma is now 3
12:35:40 <kkeithley_> okay
12:35:48 <hagarth> hchiramm++
12:35:50 <glusterbot> hagarth: hchiramm's karma is now 1
12:35:56 <kkeithley_> #topic Who's Who? page
12:35:57 <hchiramm> still TBD - working on it..
12:36:55 <kkeithley_> #topic self-heald backport memory leak
12:36:58 <pranithk> kkeithley_: Patch submitted and reviewed for self-heal daemon memory leak. You need to merge http://review.gluster.org/8541
12:37:08 <kkeithley_> yup, I saw that
12:37:24 <kkeithley_> we can mark that done
12:37:36 <kkeithley_> #topic backport NFS hang
12:37:41 <kkeithley_> ndevos says it's done
12:37:57 <kkeithley_> #topic update backport request page
12:38:01 <pranithk> kkeithley_: action item on you to merge the patch?
12:38:02 <hchiramm> http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Backport_Wishlist
12:38:10 <kkeithley_> :-)
12:38:11 <hchiramm> sections added for 3.4.6
12:38:14 <hchiramm> and 3.6.0
12:38:30 <hchiramm> which include tracker bugs
12:38:32 <kkeithley_> #action: kkeithley to merge self-heald memory leak backport
12:38:46 <kkeithley_> excellent
12:38:48 <hagarth> hchiramm: cool, thanks!
12:38:49 <ndevos> #action kkeithley_ to merge the NFS fix in 3.4 too
12:38:58 <hchiramm> yw
12:39:23 <kkeithley_> #topic plan for 3.6 feature sessions
12:39:33 <kkeithley_> hagarth says this week
12:39:39 <hagarth> right
12:39:48 <kkeithley_> #topic script for afrv2 hangout
12:39:52 <kkeithley_> pranithk?
12:40:21 <pranithk> kkeithley_: Don't have any script yet :-(. May be next to next week I will have some cycles :-|
12:40:47 <kkeithley_> #topic hangout on glusterd
12:40:50 <kkeithley_> klshm?
12:40:56 * kshlm is not here.
12:41:13 <kkeithley_> kshlm?
12:41:13 <hagarth> anyway the hangout will happen :)
12:41:16 <kshlm> I've not got around to that.
12:41:18 <kshlm> Yet.
12:41:43 <kkeithley_> #topic Ubuntu cppcheck reviews
12:41:46 <hagarth> stat kshlm - ENOENT
12:41:48 <kkeithley_> hagarth will do this week
12:41:58 <hagarth> kkeithley_: for certain, sorry about missing last week
12:42:22 <kkeithley_> much obliged
12:42:37 <ndevos> oh, and that one is also listed on my email from yesterday, it blocks 3.5.3
12:42:51 <ndevos> others are welcome to review it too :)
12:42:54 <kkeithley_> indeed
12:42:57 <hagarth> ndevos: +1
12:42:58 <kkeithley_> and indeed
12:43:21 <kkeithley_> #topic JustinClift to remove himself from Glupy maintainers
12:43:39 <kkeithley_> unknown?
12:43:40 <hagarth> not yet done
12:43:58 <kkeithley_> #topic blog about owncloud/GlusterFS talk
12:44:03 <kkeithley_> JustinClift?
12:44:16 <kkeithley_> unknown
12:44:20 <ndevos> hmm, was the talk not last week Friday?
12:44:34 <kkeithley_> dunno, maybe
12:44:34 <hagarth> yes it was last week
12:44:37 <kkeithley_> okay
12:44:53 <kkeithley_> #topic periodic bug triage meetings
12:44:57 <kkeithley_> ndevos, done, right?
12:45:10 <ndevos> partially, yes, need to send out a new invite for next week
12:45:28 <kkeithley_> #action ndevos to send invite for bug triage
12:45:35 <kkeithley_> whew
12:45:42 <kkeithley_> fifteen minutes remaining
12:45:49 <kkeithley_> #topic 3.4
12:45:59 <hagarth> think we need to reduce our AI backlog soon :)
12:46:05 <hchiramm> :)
12:46:15 <hagarth> kkeithley_: still awaiting dht fixes for 3.4.6?
12:46:20 <kkeithley_> looks like I have some fixes to merge
12:46:26 <kkeithley_> and still waiting for dht fixes
12:46:51 <kkeithley_> IIRC we're aiming for early September for a 3.4.6beta
12:47:02 <hagarth> kkeithley_: right
12:47:42 <kkeithley_> okay
12:47:49 <kkeithley_> #topic 3.5
12:47:53 <kkeithley_> ndevos?
12:47:57 * jdarcy adds an action item to reduce the action-item backlog.
12:48:07 <ndevos> waiting for dht fixes and Ubunty cppcheck...
12:48:30 <ndevos> other than that, things look good, ETA for 3.5.3 <unknown>
12:48:47 <pranithk> ndevos: Do you mind taking backport of http://review.gluster.org/8402
12:49:02 <hagarth> ndevos: maybe we could target a week after 3.4.6?
12:49:14 <pranithk> ndevos: it fixes crash reported by JoeJulian
12:49:30 <ndevos> hagarth: actually beta was planned for later this week, but its blocked on the dht fixes
12:49:34 <pranithk> kkeithley_: May be I should backport it to 3.4.x also as he is using 3.4.5 now...
12:49:44 <hagarth> ndevos: right, I remember that now
12:49:53 <ndevos> pranithk: file a bug with a backport?
12:49:56 <kkeithley_> pranithk: +1
12:50:00 <hagarth> pranithk: add a dependency on the respective trackers
12:50:01 <pranithk> ndevos: Will do
12:50:06 <ndevos> pranithk: thanks!
12:50:40 <kkeithley_> any last thoughts on 3.5?
12:50:48 <ndevos> not from me
12:50:50 <kkeithley_> #topic 3.6
12:50:57 <kkeithley_> hagarth, take it away
12:51:21 <hagarth> kkeithley_: sure
12:51:31 <pranithk> hagarth: Last week status: 10 patches sent 4 merged. 6 patches awaiting review. Need one more week I guess.
12:51:36 <hagarth> still awaiting afrv2 and dht fixes to land
12:51:55 <hagarth> before we can get to do meaningful stuff with 3.6
12:52:18 <hagarth> pranithk: thanks, will move the entire schedule by a week
12:52:55 <hagarth> any other questions on 3.6?
12:53:32 <hagarth> guess not..
12:53:32 <lalatenduM> hagarth, none from me
12:53:43 <hagarth> #action hagarth to update planning36 page
12:53:48 <kkeithley_> okay then---
12:53:56 <kkeithley_> #topic open floor
12:54:01 <kkeithley_> anything?
12:54:21 <pranithk> #action pranithk to backport graph switch crash to 3.5 and 3.6
12:54:36 <pranithk> #action pranithk to backport graph switch crash to 3.5 and 3.4
12:54:46 <pranithk> OMG 3 backports for each patch :-)
12:54:57 <hagarth> pranithk: more the merrier :)
12:55:00 <kshlm> Who wants a crash backported?? And Why??
12:55:06 <kkeithley_> remind me again when we EOL 3.4?
12:55:09 <pranithk> ah! fix
12:55:15 <ndevos> lol
12:55:21 <lalatenduM> :)
12:55:22 <pranithk> ndevos: :-D
12:55:25 <hagarth> kkeithley_: I think we can go slow on 3.4 after 3.6 happens
12:55:35 <lalatenduM> hagarth, +100 :)
12:55:38 * kkeithley_ was going to say something, but I figured everyone else would, so...
12:55:43 <hagarth> EOL probably after 3.6 stabilizes
12:55:48 <hchiramm> very very slow
12:55:50 <hchiramm> :)
12:55:51 <ndevos> oh, and we have a student that would like to implement FS-Cache for FUSE, watch out for an email to the devel list :)
12:56:12 <pranithk> ndevos++
12:56:13 <glusterbot> pranithk: ndevos's karma is now 1
12:56:18 <lalatenduM> hagarth,  how much is very very slow ? we should quantify :)
12:56:21 <pranithk> ndevos+=100
12:56:25 <ndevos> hmm, maybe the right vimal is here too?
12:56:40 <hagarth> lalatenduM: maybe a good topic for next week's meeting
12:56:46 <lalatenduM> hagarth, sure
12:57:12 <vimal> ndevos, yes, i'm here, just to see how the meetings go on
12:57:24 <ndevos> lalatenduM: add it as a topic for next week :)
12:57:31 <hagarth> vimal: welcome!
12:57:36 <pranithk> vimal: hi!
12:57:39 <vimal> hagarth, thank you
12:57:40 <lalatenduM> ndevos, :)
12:57:46 <vimal> pranithk, hello
12:58:00 <hchiramm> vimal, welcome :)
12:58:13 <vimal> hchiramm, o/
12:58:17 <hchiramm> \o
12:58:35 <ndevos> vimal: there is quite some interest in your project, so you should be able to get help/feedback/testers/... easily :D
12:59:10 <kkeithley_> any last thoughts before we wrap? (With one minute to go!)
12:59:17 <ndevos> kkeithley_++
12:59:19 <vimal> i'm discussing this with ndevos offline, and would send a mail to both the fs-cache and gluster-devel lists within a couple of days
12:59:19 <glusterbot> ndevos: kkeithley_'s karma is now 2
12:59:21 <pranithk> kkeithley_++
12:59:22 <glusterbot> pranithk: kkeithley_'s karma is now 3
12:59:29 <ndevos> I never thought you would  make it within the hour!
12:59:35 <kkeithley_> ;-)
12:59:35 <hchiramm> lets wrap :) kkeithley++
12:59:39 <kkeithley_> going once
12:59:43 <kkeithley_> going twice
12:59:45 <lalatenduM> kkeithley_++ :)
12:59:49 <kkeithley_> #endmeeting