12:01:10 <hagarth> #startmeeting
12:01:10 <zodbot> Meeting started Wed Dec 17 12:01:10 2014 UTC.  The chair is hagarth. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:01:10 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
12:01:14 <JustinClift> Awesome :)
12:01:39 <JustinClift> https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings
12:01:52 <hagarth> #topic roll call
12:01:57 * raghu is here
12:01:57 <hagarth> who do we have here today?
12:02:00 <JustinClift> Moi
12:02:04 * ndevos _o/
12:02:09 * lalatenduM is here
12:02:22 <hagarth> sounds great, let us move on to AIs from last week.
12:02:33 <hagarth> believe me the list is the longest I've seen in a while :)
12:02:39 <lpabon> hi (long time)
12:02:40 <hagarth> so bear with me while we go through the list
12:02:48 <hagarth> lpabon: welcome back!
12:03:03 <lpabon> hagarth: thanks! :-D
12:03:04 <hagarth> #topic AI review
12:03:12 <hagarth> hchiramm sends a patch that adds the new maintainers/components to the MAINTAINERS file
12:03:15 <hagarth> this has been done
12:03:25 * hchiramm is here
12:03:25 <hagarth> I intend to massage it a bit and merge it later this week
12:03:27 <hchiramm> yep. done
12:03:28 <lalatenduM> not merged I think
12:03:34 <lalatenduM> yeah
12:03:34 <hchiramm> not merged
12:03:41 <ndevos> filed as rfc?
12:03:53 <hagarth> #action hagarth to merge MAINTAINERS file this week
12:04:02 <hagarth> next AI: JustinClift fix the "wiki" link on gluster.org to redirect to the wiki and not to the blog
12:04:24 <JustinClift> Didn't do it.  Won't do it.
12:04:34 * JustinClift isn't interested in the website stuff, and I'm going on leave
12:04:41 <JustinClift> Someone else needs to do it
12:04:49 <hagarth> JustinClift: are you the wrong person to own this AI? :)
12:04:53 <JustinClift> Yep :)
12:05:05 <hagarth> JustinClift: can you suggest an alternate for this?
12:05:09 <JustinClift> misch:
12:05:11 <JustinClift> misc
12:05:22 <hagarth> ok
12:05:31 <JustinClift> Actually, tigert for the design, and misc to do the actual roll out
12:05:37 <hagarth> #action misch and tigert to fix the "wiki" link on gluster.org to redirect to the wiki and not to the blog
12:05:48 <JustinClift> misc still seems to want other people to do the commits... but hassle him enough and he'll do them himself ;)
12:05:53 <hagarth> maybe we can discuss this on gluster-infra
12:06:01 <lalatenduM> looks like a mail in gluster-infra :0
12:06:02 <JustinClift> Sure
12:06:03 <lalatenduM> :)
12:06:15 <hagarth> next AI - hchiramm will try to fix the duplicate syndication of posts from blog.nixpanic.net
12:06:21 <hagarth> this is TBD
12:06:26 <hagarth> #action hchiramm will try to fix the duplicate syndication of posts from blog.nixpanic.net
12:06:33 <hchiramm> hagarth, yet to do.
12:06:37 <hagarth> next AI - Debloper to write  a blog post about complete revamp
12:06:38 <hchiramm> discussing with JustinClift
12:06:42 <hagarth> hchiramm: ok
12:06:57 <hagarth> don't think we have debloper here, will send him a reminder
12:07:08 <hchiramm> hagarth, I will check with hum
12:07:11 <hchiramm> hum/him
12:07:14 <hagarth> hchiramm: thanks!
12:07:22 <hagarth> next AI - jdarcy schedules a "small file performance" meeting
12:07:34 * jdarcy hangs his head in shame.
12:07:41 <lpabon> lol
12:07:47 <lalatenduM> :)
12:07:49 <hagarth> an AI in present continuous tense  :)
12:08:00 <jdarcy> Very continuous.   Yes, still pending.
12:08:01 <hagarth> jdarcy: how about monday next?
12:08:23 <jdarcy> Week after Xmas won't work.  I'll be busy sliding down a mountain.
12:08:43 <jdarcy> I could do this coming Monday, though.
12:09:08 <hagarth> Let us aim for it. we would need Ben, shyam and Rudra Siva probably in addition to the usual suspects.
12:09:17 <jdarcy> OK.
12:09:32 * ndevos is interested in that too :)
12:09:44 <hagarth> #action jdarcy to schedule small file performance meeting for Dec 22nd
12:09:54 <JustinClift> hagarth: Btw, hchiramm has admin on the WordPress site now.  So, he's empowered to fix the duplicate syndication stuff
12:10:08 <hagarth> JustinClift: awesome, thanks for that!
12:10:12 <JustinClift> :)
12:10:23 <hagarth> next AI - builds in ubuntu
12:10:35 <hagarth> kaleb and partner_ seem to be looking into this one
12:10:48 <hagarth> partner_: if you are around, any update on this one?
12:10:50 <hchiramm> JustinClift, thanks
12:11:18 <hagarth> moving on to next AI
12:11:21 <hagarth> atinmu continues looking into the mgmt_v3 regression test issue
12:11:33 <hagarth> we have a patch for this now, needs review & merge
12:11:42 <hagarth> kshlm: are you looking into this patch?
12:12:02 <hagarth> maybe a question for kshlm later
12:12:06 <hagarth> next AI - atinmu will look for someone that can fix the spurious fop-sanity test
12:12:21 <hagarth> don't think we have atinmu today, let us carry this further
12:12:26 <hagarth> #action atinmu will look for someone that can fix the spurious fop-sanity test
12:12:38 <hagarth> next AI - atinmu will contact JustinClift to update the regression.sh script and capture /var/log/messages too
12:12:39 <JustinClift> #action kshlm to review into the mgmt_v3 regression test patch
12:12:41 <JustinClift> ;)
12:12:45 <hagarth> JustinClift: thanks :)
12:12:57 <hagarth> I think this is complete, JustinClift ?
12:13:21 <JustinClift> I haven't updated regression.sh, as I was under the impression it turned out to be unneeded
12:13:30 <JustinClift> If that's wrong, I'm happy to update it tho
12:13:32 <JustinClift> ???
12:13:47 <hagarth> JustinClift: I thought we decided to capture messages into the tarball
12:13:48 <ndevos> I think it could help in future?
12:14:00 <JustinClift> k, I'll update it then
12:14:15 <JustinClift> Probably be live on the slaves in about an hour from now
12:14:25 <hagarth> #action JustinClift to update the regression.sh script and capture /var/log/messages too
12:14:42 <hagarth> next AI - raghu` creates a 3.6.2 beta today (10 december) or tomorrow, release follows later this week or early next week
12:14:58 <hagarth> we have the tarball generated today
12:14:59 <raghu> I have made the beta1.
12:15:18 <hagarth> hchiramm, lalatenduM: are you folks going to spin the RPMs?
12:15:27 <lalatenduM> hagarth, yeah
12:15:28 <hagarth> once the RPMs are out we can blog & send out a note
12:15:32 <hagarth> lalatenduM: cool, thanks
12:15:42 <hagarth> next AI - JustinClift and misc should post an update or plan about upgrading Gerrit
12:15:49 <hchiramm> will follow up..
12:16:07 <hagarth> gerrit upgrade is still pending, maybe one of the first things we'll do in 2015 :)
12:16:08 <lalatenduM> hagarth, upgrading Gerrit IMO is imp
12:16:14 <hagarth> lalatenduM: +1
12:16:32 <raghu> But there are still some USS (user serviceable snapshots) related patches that have to be backported. I want to do a beta2 before making 3.6.2. Is that ok?
12:16:36 <JustinClift> It should be easy to do... pretty much shut down gerrit, backup existing data dirs, and then put the new .jar in place
12:16:38 <hagarth> lalatenduM: check the agenda page, JustinClift seems to have a plan.
12:16:39 <lalatenduM> it will enable to plug sonar in to gerrit
12:16:47 <hagarth> raghu: let us discsuss this in the 3.6 topic
12:16:48 <lalatenduM> hagarth, checking
12:17:09 <hagarth> next AI - JustinClift to respond to Soumya Deb on gluster-infra about website
12:17:20 <JustinClift> Give that to tigert
12:17:28 <hagarth> we need tigert and debloper to co-ordinate here.
12:17:42 <JustinClift> Bother tigert and Soumya are invested in the GlusterFS website
12:17:44 <hagarth> #action tigert to respond to Soumya Deb on gluster-infra about website.
12:17:49 <JustinClift> tigert already has next version designs
12:17:55 <hagarth> JustinClift: ok
12:18:13 <JustinClift> I'm unsure if they're done in co-ordination with Soumya tho.  Hasn't sounded like it. :/
12:18:53 <hagarth> JustinClift: let us loop all of them into gluster-infra
12:19:04 <hagarth> and carry out our discussions there
12:19:21 <hagarth> next AI - Discuss stabiity issues and directions
12:19:44 <hagarth> I think this was from davemc, since we don't seem to have more context I prefer nuking this.
12:20:00 <hagarth> anybody has objections to drop this from our AI list?
12:20:30 <hagarth> none I guess
12:20:31 <JustinClift> No objections atm
12:20:38 <hagarth> will drop that for now
12:21:01 <hagarth> that ends our AI list :)
12:21:04 <hagarth> #topic Gluster 3.6
12:21:19 <hagarth> raghu: can you provide an update on the current status of 3.6?
12:21:28 <raghu> I have made the beta1.
12:21:38 <ndevos> \o/
12:21:53 <hagarth> yay! a fair number of fixes already seem to be in 3.6.2beta1
12:22:08 <raghu> But there are still many changes that have to go in (mainly USS related patches)
12:22:13 <hagarth> raghu: congratulations on your first glusterfs beta release :)
12:22:24 <raghu> ha ha. Thanks :)
12:22:37 <hagarth> raghu: do we plan a beta2 soon then?
12:22:38 <jdarcy> You never forget your first.  Mainly because of the scars.
12:22:50 <raghu> I want to do beta2 before making 3.6.2
12:23:13 <hagarth> quite a few dependent bugs for 3.6.2 open - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?maxdepth=2&hide_resolved=1&id=glusterfs-3.6.2
12:23:30 <raghu> because I am backporting many of the USS related patches in next few days
12:23:32 <hagarth> raghu: can you propose a date by which you need patches for these bugs?
12:23:34 <raghu> yeah
12:23:51 <hagarth> if you don't get them, let us move the bugs to 3.6.3
12:23:54 <raghu> I prefer end of this week.
12:24:02 <raghu> Ok. Sure.
12:24:13 <hagarth> I suspect that we will have to do quite a few releases in 3.6
12:24:25 <raghu> Based on the patches I get by this weekend I either do a beta2 or 3.6.3 itself. Is that ok?
12:24:35 <raghu> oops 3.6.2
12:24:38 <hagarth> raghu: let us do a beta2 by end of this week
12:24:49 <raghu> hagarth: ok
12:24:57 <hagarth> and probably schedule 3.6.2 as a xmas present to the community :D
12:25:22 <hagarth> raghu: please drop a note on the mailing list about this schedule & deadline for patches
12:25:34 <raghu> I would have liked it more if all the USS related patches were backported before 3.6.2
12:25:43 <raghu> hagarth: sure
12:25:51 <ndevos> raghu: fwiw, when I do a beta for 3.5, no patches get merged before a release, more patches mean an other beta
12:25:57 <hagarth> raghu: let us aim to have that. Also do call out if you need help with reviews.
12:26:12 <lalatenduM> raghu, I think we can wait for all the USS related patches were backported before 3.6.2 GA
12:26:42 <raghu> ndevos: Good point. Thats why I was waiting till now for making beta1
12:26:45 <hagarth> I think we would need to merge ec and rdma patches too.
12:27:01 <hagarth> I would love to lift the tech preview embargo on rdma in 3.6.2
12:27:19 <lalatenduM> cool
12:27:20 <JustinClift> FYI, the slaves all have regression.sh updated now.  It should capture /var/log/messages* from here onwards
12:27:31 <hagarth> JustinClift: awesome, thanks!
12:27:34 <JustinClift> :)
12:27:38 <hagarth> anything more on 3.6?
12:27:45 <raghu> Nope
12:27:55 <raghu> I will send a mail to mailing list about deadline and patches
12:28:03 <hagarth> #action raghu to send out a mail to communicate 3.6.2 schedule and patch deadlines.
12:28:09 <hagarth> moving on to 3.5
12:28:11 <hagarth> #topic 3.5
12:28:24 <hagarth> ndevos: any updates here?
12:29:05 <ndevos> no, not really...
12:29:23 <hagarth> ndevos: any outstanding patches in release-3.5 that need review attention?
12:29:39 <ndevos> no plans for a release, nothing very urgent that needs fixing that was brought to my attention
12:30:05 <ndevos> several minor changes have been merged
12:30:08 <hagarth> http://review.gluster.org/#/q/branch:+release-3.5,n,z seems to have mostly rdma fixes
12:30:40 <ndevos> yeah, they can use some review
12:30:59 <hagarth> ndevos: ok, let us notify Raghavendra G & Rafi
12:31:21 <hagarth> anything more on 3.5?
12:31:42 <ndevos> Rafi should be aware already, but no harm in pinging him again
12:31:47 <ndevos> no, nothing from me
12:31:53 <hagarth> ndevos: ok
12:31:55 <hagarth> moving on
12:31:57 <hagarth> #topic 3.4
12:32:04 <hagarth> kkeithley: any updates here?
12:32:11 <lalatenduM> ..
12:32:11 <kkeithley> no, nothing of note
12:32:13 <lalatenduM> ..
12:32:14 <lalatenduM> .
12:32:22 <hagarth> I am yet to find some time to figure out the memory leak in 3.4
12:32:28 <kkeithley> same here
12:32:43 <hagarth> lalatenduM: was that some form of morse code?
12:33:00 <hagarth> don't have a morse decipher handy ;)
12:33:07 <lalatenduM> hagarth, nope , sorry abt that, not intended :)
12:33:17 <hagarth> lalatenduM: ok :)
12:33:19 <hagarth> moving on
12:33:26 <hagarth> #topic Gluster next
12:33:39 <hagarth> 3.7 has had a few new feature pages added
12:33:52 <hagarth> upcalls, CLI for nfs ganesha etc.
12:34:04 <hagarth> bitrot design document is also out for review
12:34:19 <hagarth> please feel free to review and provide your comments
12:34:35 <hagarth> I expect more feature pages to appear in the next few weeks
12:34:52 <hagarth> any thoughts, questions on 3.7?
12:35:11 <jdarcy> Is there a "theme" for 3.7?
12:35:28 <jdarcy> I mean, something we can state briefly when people ask?
12:35:29 <hagarth> jdarcy: data services - tiering, bitrot etc.
12:35:44 <lalatenduM> we need a blog :)
12:35:57 <hagarth> nah that can't be a theme
12:36:12 <hagarth> there are two ways of arriving at a theme
12:36:19 <jdarcy> In the absence of a real community mangler, I could write a blog entry to drum up some interest.
12:36:31 <hagarth> jdarcy: +1
12:36:39 <lalatenduM> jdarcy, +1
12:36:47 <hagarth> one is proactively & the other would be a retrofit
12:37:03 <hagarth> for most community projects, we seem to do the latter :)
12:37:26 <hagarth> nevertheless we can try to be more proactive .. 4.0 already has well defined themes
12:37:54 <JustinClift> For a theme for 3.7, I'd like us to concentrate on code cleanup and stability
12:38:09 <JustinClift> Features are secondary.  But that's just me, and unrealistic. :)
12:38:20 <hagarth> performance improvement is definitely I would like to see as a theme for 3.7
12:38:43 <JustinClift> By code clean up I mean stuff like "prepare the code, for future big changes"
12:39:16 <JustinClift> eg like the stuff kshlm did for getting the name/address stuff in good shape
12:39:23 <hagarth> JustinClift: part of it is in progress, the glusterd folks are doing that. quota & geo-replication will most likely get a cleanup in 3.7.
12:39:24 <JustinClift> But for other things too
12:39:29 <JustinClift> np :)
12:39:32 <jdarcy> I do need to think some more about what "4.0 prep" might belong in 3.7
12:40:18 <hagarth> jdarcy: right, there is some ongoing work on sharding too which might land in 3.7 .. so there are bound to be overlaps between 3.next releases & 4.0
12:40:23 <JustinClift> It'd be good to get IPv6 support into 3.7 too I suppose.
12:40:41 <JustinClift> No idea of how important/priority/effort-requred tho
12:40:51 <hagarth> JustinClift: yes, recently I came across a IPv6 only cloud
12:41:02 * JustinClift is just spitballing, and this isn't the place for that ;)
12:41:19 <jdarcy> That's what the wiki is for.
12:41:35 <hagarth> and somebody else mentioned that due to the address crunch in v4, IPv4 addresses/network was being charged while IPv6 was being given out for free.
12:41:49 <hagarth> JustinClift: please feel free to open a few feature pages :)
12:42:06 <jdarcy> BTW, some of us are looking at freedcamp for 4.0 PM.  People might want to think about it for 3.7 as well.
12:42:11 <hagarth> having feature pages will be useful in getting new contributors over
12:42:17 <hagarth> jdarcy: sounds like a good idea
12:42:41 <hagarth> jdarcy: any updates from 4.0 that you want to share here?
12:42:59 <jdarcy> Only one thing, really...
12:43:28 <jdarcy> We've had some discussions about sharing infrastructure for databases and logs, since several features depend on one or the other.
12:43:57 <hagarth> right..
12:43:57 <jdarcy> I invite anyone working on (or interested in) such a feature to make sure their needs in that area are represented on the 4.0 feature pages.
12:44:22 <jdarcy> Otherwise we'll have three databases and four logs in our I/O stack, and we'll be slower than molasses in January.
12:44:54 <hagarth> jdarcy: ok, what are the database and log generators that you foresee?
12:44:59 <hagarth> changelog, NSR, tiering?
12:45:45 <jdarcy> There has been talk of it in AFR.  Some of what AFR/georep do is also related in purpose (even if it uses links or xattrs currently).
12:45:53 <jdarcy> Also talk in EC, I meant to say.
12:45:54 <purpleidea> (is meeting now?)
12:45:58 <hagarth> right
12:46:24 <hagarth> we can also throw quota into the mix
12:46:24 <JustinClift> purpleidea: Yeah, we're at the end of it nearly
12:46:29 <JustinClift> purpleidea: Last few minutes
12:46:36 <jdarcy> hagarth: Yes, I knew there was at least one I was forgetting.  Thanks.
12:46:55 <jdarcy> Even DHT might have a use for such a thing.
12:47:03 <hagarth> jdarcy: should we start a discussion on gluster-devel?
12:47:10 <hagarth> right
12:47:12 <jdarcy> hagarth: Yes.
12:47:32 <hagarth> jdarcy: let us do this.. else we'll end up fsyncing our way to performance hell.
12:47:33 <purpleidea> JustinClift: better late than never? ;)
12:47:39 <JustinClift> purpleidea: :)
12:48:10 <jdarcy> BTW, information from those same logs might be useful for performance monitoring/tuning.
12:48:39 <hagarth> jdarcy: agree, we could probably look at making it more consumable/presentable
12:49:24 <hagarth> ok, anything more on Gluster.next?
12:49:38 * jdarcy shakes his head.
12:49:44 <hagarth> OK, let's move on
12:49:46 <hagarth> #topic Other Agenda items
12:50:03 <hagarth> we discussed Gerrit & Ubuntu already
12:50:38 <hagarth> random question - do any of us happen to notice duplicate posts from gluster.org on Facebook/twitter?
12:51:01 <jdarcy> Not so much dups as *really old* stuff reappearing.
12:51:03 <JustinClift> Hmmm, I think that used to be a problem with Twitter.  Haven't looked recently tho
12:51:08 <JustinClift> jdarcy: Yeah
12:51:39 <kkeithley> is that @glusterfs or something else?
12:51:47 <jdarcy> Don't recall one for the last coupla weeks though.
12:51:55 <hagarth> Hmm, we need to figure out what's happening here. Twitter, blog & Facebook are linked in some fashion. An update somewhere probably triggers duplication/stale reposts.
12:52:05 <JustinClift> I don't know the mechanism that's used to push the posts to thigs
12:52:06 <JustinClift> things
12:52:12 <hagarth> kkeithley: @gluster.. unfortunately we don't own @glusterfs
12:52:28 <kkeithley> oh, haha
12:52:43 <JustinClift> hagarth: Are you sure?
12:52:50 <hagarth> JustinClift: absolutely
12:52:56 <ndevos> lol, https://twitter.com/gluster has my last blog post 4x
12:52:59 <JustinClift> hagarth: Didn't Twitter give that to us recently, after we asked them for it?  Or was that a different one?
12:53:10 <jdarcy> It's the Twitter equivalent of a domain squatter.  Wants $$$ IIRC.
12:53:22 <hagarth> JustinClift: haven't heard that
12:53:25 * JustinClift could have sworn we got some version of that rixed not long ago
12:53:36 <hagarth> ndevos: yeah, we need to sort this over.
12:53:50 <hagarth> ndevos: could be linked to the duplicate syndication problem
12:53:50 <JustinClift> #action hagarth to contact Rikki Endsley about fixing the twitter glusterfs domain squatter problem
12:53:59 <hagarth> JustinClift: will do
12:54:35 <hagarth> another topic - we need an interim replacement for JustinClift to manage/moderate mailing lists when he is away
12:54:40 <hagarth> any volunteers?
12:55:02 <JustinClift> It just needs someone to go through the queue once per day, and approve the messages that are valid
12:55:08 <JustinClift> It's 90% spam
12:55:08 <jdarcy> We do have a trademark on "GlusterFS" don't we?  That should be sufficient as far as Twitter is concerned.
12:55:21 <JustinClift> jdarcy: Yeah, I don't think it'll take us much effort
12:55:26 <hagarth> jdarcy: yes the gluster.org board owns the trademark IIUC.
12:55:37 <hagarth> hchiramm: can you help with moderation?
12:56:02 <hchiramm> yep
12:56:08 <hagarth> hchiramm: awesome, thanks!
12:56:10 <jdarcy> Unfortunately, everyone from Red Hat US tends to be on forced leave over the holidays.
12:56:22 <hagarth> JustinClift: you have your answer here for list-admin :)
12:56:33 <JustinClift> hchiramm: it is. :)
12:56:45 <hchiramm> :)
12:56:50 <hagarth> shall we cancel the community meetings for next 2 weeks?
12:56:58 <hchiramm> +!
12:57:04 <hchiramm> +1
12:57:13 <purpleidea> +1!
12:57:17 <JustinClift> hchiramm: Ahhh, you already get the mailing list notifications yeah?
12:57:28 <hchiramm> yep
12:57:38 <JustinClift> k.  I'll leave them to you to do then.
12:57:39 <hagarth> OK, next meeting will be on Jan 7th.
12:57:44 <hagarth> another listed topic from purpleidea
12:57:48 <hagarth> purpleidea: go ahead please
12:57:56 <purpleidea> have a look at: https://github.com/purpleidea/puppet-gluster/commit/9b5f690da9f6c000325682f5b8e0b8003eeb5219#diff-7cb3f60a533975d869ffd4a772d66cfeR1
12:58:06 <purpleidea> puppet-gluster needs to know about the operating version table...
12:58:17 <purpleidea> i made it easy to add new version mappings by dropping in a yaml file...
12:58:36 <purpleidea> so if anyone is bumping the versions, please send me a patch, or poke me if you remember :)
12:58:40 <hagarth> purpleidea: cool, can you please also drop a note on gluster-devel?
12:58:46 <purpleidea> hagarth: sure!
12:59:03 <hagarth> purpleidea: we normally bump the op-versions at least once per major release
12:59:19 <hagarth> kshlm and others would be interested in this.
12:59:30 <hagarth> we have one more minute left .. any other topics?
12:59:54 <ndevos> any plans for FOSDEM?
12:59:58 <JustinClift> Happy holidays everyone that's doing them?
13:00:07 <purpleidea> i'll be at config mgmt camp and maybe fosdem too
13:00:10 <ndevos> or, the CentOS Dojo happening the day before?
13:00:15 <JustinClift> RH OSAS team will almost all be at FOSDEM is my understanding, if that's useful
13:00:20 <hagarth> ndevos: If my talk gets accepted, I will be there
13:00:40 <ndevos> ah, cool, I'll be there - and I think kkeithley too
13:00:54 <hagarth> ndevos: maybe we could have a Gluster BoF session there
13:00:59 <kkeithley> I registered, yes
13:01:25 <lalatenduM> for Fosdem check  http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-promo/2014-December/001492.html
13:01:31 <JustinClift> jdarcy: Freedcamp != open source :(
13:01:52 <lalatenduM> I might go too, if my talks gets accepted
13:01:58 <jdarcy> JustinClift: True enough, but it's hard to find a service in this particular space that is.
13:02:01 <hagarth> we probably need a community events calendar for Gluster .. let's have one in 2015
13:02:02 <kkeithley> +1 for a BoF
13:02:02 <ndevos> hagarth: or a gluster meetup/drinks/dinner with people who are interested to talk glusterey things
13:02:23 <hagarth> ndevos: sure, anything works
13:02:28 <JustinClift> jdarcy: Damn.  Once of those non-optimal situations.  Oh well. ;)
13:02:45 <kkeithley> I was tempted to go to the Gluster meetup in Finland, but it's nine days before Fosdem
13:03:15 <hagarth> kkeithley: yeah, that's unfortunate.
13:03:21 <ndevos> ah, right, I wanted to ask you about that
13:03:25 <hagarth> alright folks, we seem to be done for this year :)
13:03:37 <hagarth> happy holidays to everyone and see you all in 2015!
13:03:39 <JustinClift> :)
13:03:46 <JustinClift> Thanks everyone.  Have fun, etc. :D
13:03:48 <ndevos> wohoo, I can go home now!
13:03:51 <lalatenduM> same to you :)
13:03:56 <hagarth> #endmeeting