12:00:47 #startmeeting 12:00:47 Meeting started Tue Jun 9 12:00:47 2015 UTC. The chair is atinmu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 12:00:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 12:00:55 who all do we have here today? 12:01:10 * rafi1 is here 12:01:25 #chair rafi1 12:01:25 Current chairs: atinmu rafi1 12:01:53 #info roll call 12:02:36 #topic Roll Call 12:02:49 #info Agenda https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-bug-triage 12:03:05 seems like apart from rafi1 no one is here 12:03:16 we will wait for another couple of minutes 12:03:42 * ndevos _o/ 12:04:03 #topic Action Items from last week 12:04:24 #topic ndevos needs to look into building nightly debug rpms that can be used for testing 12:04:32 ndevos, I believe this is done right? 12:04:47 ndevos, I see that patch is merged 12:04:51 atinmu: not completely, lets keep it on the list to remind me :) 12:05:01 ndevos, ok :) 12:05:14 providing the ability to build with debug is one step, there are more coming 12:05:36 #action ndevos to still follow up on building nightly debug rpms 12:05:46 moving on 12:05:51 #topic Group Triage 12:06:34 #info 13 new bugs that have not been triaged yet : http://goo.gl/WuDQun 12:06:52 * atinmu locks 1228142 12:08:03 * ndevos locks 1229639 12:08:35 * rafi1 locks 1229331 12:08:45 * atinmu locks 1229139 12:09:14 * ndevos locks 1229422 12:10:08 * atinmu locks 1229226 12:10:58 * rafi1 locks 1229127 12:12:27 * atinmu locks 1228785 12:13:02 atinmu: ndevos : what about setting documentation flag for doc bugd (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229127, ? 12:14:46 rafi1: we dont use that flag, it does not add any value 12:15:09 ndevos: Ok i will remove it 12:15:15 * ndevos locks 1228785 12:15:21 * ndevos fails 12:15:48 rafi1: yeah, dropping it is fine, keeping it does not matter either :) 12:15:59 ndevos: ok 12:16:18 * ndevos locks 1228696 12:16:39 * atinmu locks 1228111 12:17:13 * rafi1 locks 1228157 12:18:32 * rafi1 locks 1229228 12:18:50 * atinmu is left with 1226788, so locks it 12:19:50 ndevos: Do you know who is maintain Ubuntu packages ? (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229228) 12:19:54 ndevos, 1226788 was triaged last week and was marked needinfo, Csaba didn't get back, so no action required 12:21:03 rafi1: assign it to kkeithle for now 12:21:25 atinmu: yeah, leave it that way 12:21:30 ndevos: sure I will do that 12:24:09 so we are done with the Group Triage 12:24:13 #topic Open Floor 12:24:46 #info just FYI, there are 47 bugs which are still in Needinfo and not closed 12:24:55 ndevos: what about automated handling of bug state ? 12:25:21 ndevos: we can include triage keyword also :D 12:25:23 rafi1: ah, yeah, we need to follow up on that, I did not get (or see) any responses to my email 12:25:24 #info https://goo.gl/08IHrT tracks all the bugs which are in needinfo 12:25:31 wait, atinmu responded 12:26:14 ndevos: atinmu : can we put a keyword "triaged" if someone sends a patch ? 12:26:17 yes, automatically move bugs from MODIFIED to ON_QA when there is a alpha/beta release, not nightly 12:26:21 atinmu: ndevos : for a bug 12:27:12 ndevos, my concern is we can not move bugs to ON_QA based on nightly builds, that looks incorrect to me 12:27:15 rafi1: actually, "Triaged" would not be needed to set, we would move the bug to POST - and our search queries only list "NEW && !Triaged" 12:27:38 ndevos, rest of the flow looks good to me 12:27:48 ndevos: ok then it is fine 12:27:58 atinmu: yeah, I understand, and am happy with only doing ON_QA for alpha/beta releases 12:28:23 ndevos, shyam had some concerns there where he opts to do it manually, but I have seen enough negligence on this flow 12:28:55 atinmu: yes, and we will have a way to opt-out :) 12:29:15 ndevos, so I would be happy if this gets automated even though I try to do it manually and achieve 100% success criteria :) 12:29:37 atinmu: +1 12:30:26 atinmu: even Shyam confessed he did not always update the status, you are on a 100% hitrate? 12:30:53 ndevos, I do not do well on Modified->ON_QA 12:31:08 ndevos, rest I do, probably 99% :D 12:31:26 atinmu: hehe, and MODIFIED -> ON_QA would be a release-maintainers task 12:31:59 ndevos, and I have a reputation of doing this thing for other's patches :) 12:32:38 I would like to see: 1. tag a release, 2. push to Gerrit, 3. Jenkins catches the new tag, 4. Jenkins builds tarball, 5. Jenkins modifies bugs (ON_QA or CLOSED) 12:33:53 ndevos, +1 for sure 12:35:30 I guess we need to start implementing the auto-bug-update? 12:35:31 so that's it, any thing else? 12:36:34 nothing from me :) 12:36:42 rafi1, how about you> 12:36:50 atinmu: nothing for me 12:36:59 so that brings an end to this meeting 12:37:07 thanks ndevos rafi1 for your help 12:37:15 ndevos++ rafi1++ 12:37:23 #endmeeting