========================================== #gluster-meeting: Gluster Community Weekly ========================================== Meeting started by hagarth_ at 12:03:29 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-11-25/gluster_community_weekly.2015-11-25-12.03.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Rollcall (hagarth_, 12:03:59) * AIs from last week (hagarth_, 12:05:17) * ACTION: ndevos send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively enforcing backports of bugfixes (hagarth_, 12:05:53) * ACTION: raghu to call for volunteers and help from maintainers for doing backports listed by rwareing to 3.6.8 (hagarth_, 12:07:13) * ACTION: rafi to setup a doodle poll for bug triage meeting (hagarth_, 12:14:13) * ACTION: rastar and msvbhat to publish a test exit criterion for major/minor releases on gluster.org (hagarth_, 12:15:54) * ACTION: samikshan to send status on Gluster Eventing (hagarth_, 12:17:22) * ACTION: atinm/kshlm to put up the GlusterD 2.0 design doc by end of next week (hagarth_, 12:18:58) * ACTION: kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla,  github (hagarth_, 12:21:12) * ACTION: hagarth to check if a bruteforce approach to backporting regression framework will work (kshlm, 12:31:05) * ACTION: rastar to go the more elegant way. (kshlm, 12:31:24) * ACTION: jdarcy to bug amye about disucssion on long-term releases (hagarth_, 12:39:26) * LINK: http://review.gluster.org/#/q/message:glusterd+AND+status:open -> something like this can filter gerrit with a tag and patch status (Humble, 12:50:00) * ACTION: hagarth_ to start a thread on review backlog (hagarth_, 12:50:27) * GlusterFS 3.7 (hagarth_, 12:51:05) * GlusterFS 3.8 (hagarth_, 12:55:15) * ACTION: hagarth_ to start a discussion around 3.8 release dates. (hagarth_, 12:56:32) * Open Floor (hagarth_, 13:00:50) * ACTION: kkeithley_ to start a ML discussion on code hygiene for new features. (hagarth_, 13:03:41) Meeting ended at 13:12:57 UTC. Action Items ------------ * ndevos send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively enforcing backports of bugfixes * raghu to call for volunteers and help from maintainers for doing backports listed by rwareing to 3.6.8 * rafi to setup a doodle poll for bug triage meeting * rastar and msvbhat to publish a test exit criterion for major/minor releases on gluster.org * samikshan to send status on Gluster Eventing * atinm/kshlm to put up the GlusterD 2.0 design doc by end of next week * kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla, github * hagarth to check if a bruteforce approach to backporting regression framework will work * rastar to go the more elegant way. * jdarcy to bug amye about disucssion on long-term releases * hagarth_ to start a thread on review backlog * hagarth_ to start a discussion around 3.8 release dates. * kkeithley_ to start a ML discussion on code hygiene for new features. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * atinm * atinm/kshlm to put up the GlusterD 2.0 design doc by end of next week * hagarth_ * hagarth_ to start a thread on review backlog * hagarth_ to start a discussion around 3.8 release dates. * jdarcy * jdarcy to bug amye about disucssion on long-term releases * kkeithley_ * kkeithley_ to start a ML discussion on code hygiene for new features. * kshlm * atinm/kshlm to put up the GlusterD 2.0 design doc by end of next week * kshlm & csim to set up faux/pseudo user email for gerrit, bugzilla, github * msvbhat * rastar and msvbhat to publish a test exit criterion for major/minor releases on gluster.org * rafi * rafi to setup a doodle poll for bug triage meeting * raghu * raghu to call for volunteers and help from maintainers for doing backports listed by rwareing to 3.6.8 * rastar * rastar and msvbhat to publish a test exit criterion for major/minor releases on gluster.org * rastar to go the more elegant way. * **UNASSIGNED** * ndevos send out a reminder to the maintainers about more actively enforcing backports of bugfixes * samikshan to send status on Gluster Eventing * hagarth to check if a bruteforce approach to backporting regression framework will work People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * hagarth_ (142) * kshlm (52) * kkeithley_ (29) * rastar (27) * jdarcy (13) * atinm (10) * raghu (9) * msvbhat (5) * zodbot (4) * rafi (3) * Humble (2) * justinclift (2) * anoopcs (1) * skoduri (1) * poornimag (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot