<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:00:30
!startmeeting EPEL (2026-01-21)
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
18:00:32
Meeting started at 2026-01-21 18:00:30 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
18:00:32
The Meeting name is 'EPEL (2026-01-21)'
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:00:39
!topic aloha
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:00:39
!meetingname epel
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
18:00:40
The Meeting Name is now epel
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:00:49
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:00:50
Diego Herrera (dherrera) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:01:03
Hi Diego Herrera
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:01:45
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:01:46
Carl George (carlwgeorge) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:02:57
Hi Carl George
<@elguero:fedora.im>
18:03:35
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:03:36
Michael Young (elguero)
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:04:21
morning
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:04:22
Hi Michael L. Young
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:04:28
Morning nirik
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:04:30
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:04:32
Neal Gompa (ngompa) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:04:36
Hi Conan Kudo
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:12
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/epel/docs/pulls
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:12
!topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:12
!link https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:31
We have two issues marked for meeting, although we talked about one last week.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:05:53
!epel 355
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:05:55
● **Last Updated:** 6 days ago
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:05:55
**epel #355** (https://pagure.io/epel/issue/355):**Transition from Pagure to Forgejo instance**
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:05:55
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:05:55
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:05:55
● **Opened:** 3 months ago by dherrera
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:06:23
If I remember correctly, we decided to do this work in the first week of February.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:06:40
But we kept the meeting label on, so on that week, we won't forget it.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:07:20
Yep, it says that in the comment, so moving on.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:07:34
FYI, qa has a checklist thing that I used for the infra move that could be helpful.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:08:10
Cool. Could you put that in a comment for the issue?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:08:29
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/836
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:08:30
please share :D
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:08:32
sure
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:09:03
oh, this is nice ^-^ I'll look into it
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:09:52
Anything else before we move on?
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:10:20
fine with moving on ^^
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:10:31
!epel 322
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:10:31
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:10:31
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:10:31
● **Last Updated:** 6 days ago
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:10:31
● **Opened:** 10 months ago by tdawson
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:10:31
**epel #322** (https://pagure.io/epel/issue/322):**Document EPEL policy on packages with epel in the name**
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:10:48
And it's related pull request...
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:11:00
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/epel/docs/pulls/358
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:11:22
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
18:11:23
Robby Callicotte (rcallicotte) - he / him / his
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:11:29
Hi Robby Callicotte
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:11:38
i'm ready to merge as-is, but did have a "what if" question in the comments
<@rcallicotte:fedora.im>
18:11:46
I'm juggling another meeting :)
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:12:04
basically it's written for an `-epel` suffix, but we could adjust it to be be `epel` in the package name at all
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:12:20
i'm not sure if it's necessary
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:13:15
I'm good with it being just 'epel' ... I can think of people thinking, Hey, I'm going to call this epel-xyz ...
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:14:11
You'd have to do a little tweeking, because you have "-epel suffixes" ... and if it's at the beginning, it wouldn't be a suffix.
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:14:55
really it should just be epel-release and epel-rpm-macros, i can't think of any others
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:15:15
Correct, which is why it would be good for someone else to not make one.
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:15:38
we could merge as-is, call it good enough, and switch it to an `epel` string if the situation arises in the future
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:15:46
or i can rework this pr, i'm fine either way
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:16:01
That sounds like a good plan.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:16:09
Because I really like what you have.
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:16:36
I think that other uses of epel should just be reserved
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:16:59
let's just fully reserve the name
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:17:03
we can always adjust if there comes another case.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:17:03
yeah
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:19:04
Conan Kudo: Are you ok with merging what we have now, and adding something that expands it to reserve the whole name?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:19:15
yeah sure
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:19:31
it occurs to me we need to add all the esc members to the epel forge org
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:19:36
there probably needs to be a fedora-level doc about reserved names though
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:19:49
that should be brought up to fpc
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:20:03
I just worry that if we don't merge this now, it will be several weeks before we merge it.
<@dherrera:fedora.im>
18:20:44
just merged it 👍️
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:22:23
Does someone want to write up a new issue dealing with reserving the epel name ?
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
18:22:44
yeah I'll file it with fpc
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:22:44
Since it will be a little bit different, It would be good to close this one, and create a new one.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:22:57
Sounds good.
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:23:06
fedora probably needs the same policy
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:23:41
Ya, once they have their policy, we can put a link in this section to that.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:23:51
Anything else on this before we move on?
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:24:16
!topic Old Business
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:24:36
Does anyone have any old business they want to bring up?
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:25:39
Looking like a no ... so I'll move on to Open Floor.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:25:47
!topic General Issues / Open Floor
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:26:17
Hmmm ... maybe I should have brought this up in Old Business, but next week we have canceled this meeting.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:26:57
That came out wierd. This meeting has been canceled for next week. That sounds better.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:29:04
I'm not getting back from FOSDOM until Tuesday Feb 3rd. If nobody sees me anywhere on Wedensday Feb 4th ... assume I have the FOSDOM Flu, and someone else can run the meeting.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:30:01
Any other Open Floor items?
<@carlwgeorge:fedora.im>
18:30:25
hope to see some of y'all at the epel hackfest and esc panel at connect
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
18:30:44
everyone have safe travels and a good time at connect/fosdem!
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:32:41
Looks like nobody has anything else. Are we ok closing early?
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:33:41
Sounds like ya'll want to end early.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:34:01
See some of ya'll next week, and the rest I'll talk to you in two weeks.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:34:13
Thank ya'll for all you do for EPEL and it's community.
<@tdawson:fedora.im>
18:34:32
!endmeeting