#meeting-1:fedoraproject.org log

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:29:20

!startmeeting fedora_coreos_meeting

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

15:29:21

Meeting started at 2026-08-05 15:29:20 UTC

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

15:29:22

The Meeting name is 'fedora_coreos_meeting'

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:30:09

!topic roll call

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:30:09

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

15:30:18

!hi

<@rapneset:matrix.org>

15:30:20

!hi

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

15:30:26

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

15:30:29

rapneset: Rolv Apneseth (rapneset)

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

15:30:32

Nemric: Emeric Chassagne (nemric)

<@hricky:fedora.im>

15:30:44

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

15:30:45

Hristo Marinov: Hristo Marinov (hricky) - he / him / his

<@marmijo:fedora.im>

15:31:29

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

15:31:30

marmijo: Michael Armijo (marmijo)

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:33:17

!topic Action items from last meeting

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:33:36

Hey everyone, we have three action items for the last meeting.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:34:57

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:34:57

I know Rolv Apneseth and Angel Cervera Roldan has been working on this one. Do you have any updates to share with us?

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:34:57

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:34:57

**[/boot Partition Size]: Perform tests to determine actual failure scenarios related to the /boot partition size, following up on a previous meeting.**

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:34:57

First one is:

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

15:36:09

I have currently been running some tests to see if there are any issues that could come from re-provisioning to a base image with larger partition sizes, the main goal being to make sure that we never corrup the partitions following the rootfs

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

15:36:45

I will continue testing this a little more in deeply / with different setups, and give a more detailed update once that is done

<@rapneset:matrix.org>

15:38:01

Yeah we'll probably need another meeting with Dusty too

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

15:38:01

But it seems that generally, there will not be a loss of data, but re-provisioning may fail. You can always re provision to the old image and your data should be just fine

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

15:38:42

But it seems that generally, there will not be a loss of data, but re-provisioning may fail. You can always re provision to the old image and your data should be just fine (so you can do a backup/shrink it)

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:38:53

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:38:53

I also wanted to share with the community the hackmd document that we wrote in the meeting about this topic if someone want to share their insights or some specific scenario that they may have doubts about.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:38:53

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:38:53

Nice, thank you Angel Cervera Roldan and Rolv Apneseth.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:38:53

https://hackmd.io/@angelcerveraroldan/BJX3ZtvBMx

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

15:39:32

Feel free to add anything anyone wants tested to open questions, and well get around to it during testing

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:40:13

Thanks!

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:40:18

Next action item:

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:41:07

**[Fedora 45 Test Day]: Hristo Marinov will open a ticket in the quality tracker to begin organizing the test day.**

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:41:07

Hristo Marinov did you had the opportunity to do it?

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:41:07

<@hricky:fedora.im>

15:41:32

I was unable to open the issue, but I'll do it by the end of the week.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:42:35

No problem! Thanks for your initiative to help in our test week!

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:43:31

Not sure if Peyton Robertson is here with us today, but if someone has any news about it feel free to share.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:43:31

We have one more action item before we go to our topics:

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:43:31

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:43:31

**[Ignition/Butane]: Peyton Robertson will ask the Flatcar team for their feedback on the proposed native Butane support in Ignition.**

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:43:31

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:47:16

I guess we don't have any information about this action item so let's see if we can ask her about the flatcar feedback in the next community meeting.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:47:43

That's all we have for our action items, so let's go take a look on Fedora 45 Release Schedule

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:47:47

!topic Review Fedora 45 Release Schedule

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:47:52

!link https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-45/f-45-key-tasks.html

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:49:46

And we have `*Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable)`* and `*Branch Fedora Linux 45 from Rawhide*` scheduled to 2026-08-11.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:49:46

**Retire Orphaned and Long-Time FTBFS Rawhide Packages

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:49:46

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/**

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:49:46

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:49:46

So, yesterday we had this step:

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:49:46

<@marmijo:fedora.im>

15:50:28

Wow, branching is next week! How the time flies

<@marmijo:fedora.im>

15:51:46

We'll have some steps to enable the `branched` stream and have it start tracking F45

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:53:10

Do you need any help with this steps?

<@marmijo:fedora.im>

15:54:16

I dont think so, but I'm happy to show the process to anyone who is interested

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:55:17

I am interested to see how it works, but we can talk about it later!

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:55:23

Thanks, marmijo

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:55:28

marmijo: ++

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

15:55:29

ydesouza gave a cookie to marmijo. They now have 25 cookies, 6 of which were obtained in the Fedora 44 release cycle

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

15:56:28

as https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3661 is approved, what would be the next steps to make it available in CoreOS

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

15:57:11

I'll get in touch with jbtrystram 😉

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

15:59:19

Is anyone familiar with the proccess after the proposal is accepted?

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:00:06

I think that should land in rowhide first, isn't it ?

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:00:07

I am not, since Dusty and Timothee are on PTO I think that asking JB is likely the best way to go

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:00:17

I think that should land in rawhide first, isn't it ?

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:00:43

Yes, I do think that rawhide should be the first target

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:01:24

What I am not sure is if there are any specific things that need to be done after the proposal gets accepted

<@hricky:fedora.im>

16:01:32

Basically, you have to actually implement the change.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:02:56

@nemric, feel free to bring this in our channel so people who are not here today can answer how the process works properly. But yes, I guess first step is implement the change and them the first target would be rawhide.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:03:01

Thanks for bring this up!

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:03:40

Nemric: ++

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

16:03:50

acervera gave a cookie to nemric. They now have 4 cookies, 2 of which were obtained in the Fedora 44 release cycle

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:03:52

Nemric: ++

<@rapneset:matrix.org>

16:07:16

Nemric: ++

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

16:07:19

rapneset gave a cookie to nemric. They now have 5 cookies, 3 of which were obtained in the Fedora 44 release cycle

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:08:35

So, we don't have any topics in our tracker repository. No issues labeled as "meeting" to discuss.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:11:05

I guess we can go to our open floor next.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:11:20

!topic Open Floor

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:12:25

perhaps should I wait for PTO returns, but this PR https://github.com/coreos/butane/pull/698 is stuck, I'm not under time pressure that said ^^

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:14:54

Ah, the PR fell through the cracks. The butane repo is in the process of being archived (being moved into the ignition repo), maybe its worth moving the PR to there ?

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:16:46

Ah, the PR fell through the cracks. The butane repo is in the process of being archived (the butane source is being moved into the ignition repo), maybe its worth moving the PR to there ?

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:16:57

I will review your PR. But yes, we are waiting for a FESCO votation to merge butane into ignition. I am not sure how much time it will takes for it to happen, but we can move it to Ignition if necessary.

<@rapneset:matrix.org>

16:17:37

I think that was approved wasn't it. I thought we were just waiting on https://github.com/coreos/ignition/pull/2235

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:17:46

Ok, not a point as json schemas are online on my repo 😉

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:17:53

We cold ask spresti when he comes back. I am not sure how far in the process he is, but the butane repo had the readme edited to be archived. I would certainly like to see the shemas for butane

<@gotmax23:fedora.im>

16:18:05

Are you talking about https://forge.fedoraproject.org/fesco/tickets/issues/3650? That was approved last week

<@rapneset:matrix.org>

16:18:26

That's what I thought yeah

<@rapneset:matrix.org>

16:18:50

That PR will probably be merged when spresti is back

<@angelcr:matrix.org>

16:19:05

I assume it won't be long until it gets merged after that yes

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:19:29

ok, I'll wait for later move

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:20:53

Any other subjects for our open floor?

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:21:19

I'm ok 🙂

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:21:58

Nice, I guess we can end our meeting a little bit earlier today.

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:22:14

Thanks everyone for your participation!

<@nemric:relativit.fr>

16:22:33

thanks Yasmin Valim de Souza and all 🙂

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:22:37

Feel free to bring any topics in our FCOS room and see you all next week!

<@ydesouza:fedora.im>

16:22:46

!endmeeting