#meeting-2:fedoraproject.org log

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:01:02

!startmeeting Fedora ARM Working Group Meeting

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

15:01:03

Meeting started at 2024-08-20 15:01:02 UTC

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

15:01:03

The Meeting name is 'Fedora ARM Working Group Meeting'

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:01:07

!chair pwhalen pbrobinson jlinton jforbes coremodule

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:01:13

!topic roll call

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:01:22

morning

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:01:27

morning

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:01:28

Hello all, who is around today for an ARM meeting?

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:03:05

Hello! Let's jump in.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:03:15

!topic 1) ==== Previous Release ====

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:03:19

!info Fedora-39-20240820.0

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:03:25

!link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=39&build=Fedora-Cloud-39-20240820.0&groupid=5

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:03:32

Anything new regarding F39? I have nothing.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:03:58

youtu

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:04:05

nothing here, no machines on f39

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:04:17

Me neither!

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:04:24

Alright, let's move on to F40 status.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:04:33

!topic 2) ==== Current Release ====

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:04:37

!info Fedora-40-20240820.0

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:04:43

!link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=40&build=Fedora-Cloud-40-20240820.0&groupid=5

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:05:06

Latest testing of mine (not really testing, but daily use) shows no issues.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:06:03

Cool. jforbes, it's your time to shine!

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:06:05

!topic 3) ==== Kernel Status ====

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:06:10

!info F40 kernel-6.10.6-200.fc40

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:06:15

!link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2532093

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:06:19

!info Rawhide kernel-6.11.0-0.rc4.37.fc41

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:06:24

!link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2532204

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:06:34

Things are moving along with both 6.11-rc4, I should have final configs set this week

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:07:08

As it will be the release kernel for F41, that brings up some other bits, specifically, this blocker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283978

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:08:25

I don't see a fix on the horizon in the beta timeframe, so I think the solution there is to document it and tell people to turn off the autosuspend feature, which the kernel does not control

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:09:16

Otherwise, stable Fedora is on 6.10.5 with 6.10.6 in updates testing, and I am not aware of any major issues

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:11:17

Okay, thanks jforbes. I can look to document this on our commonbugs for F41 so that we can wait it and see if it makes it into this release at all.

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:11:43

coremodule: appreciate that

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:12:10

!topic 4) ==== Bootloader Status ====

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:12:14

!info uboot-tools-2024.10-0.1.rc2.fc41

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:12:19

!link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2530785

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:12:50

I haven't tested this new uboot, testing here would be appreciated.

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:14:11

I think I did, on a couple devices

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:14:38

Awesome, thanks pwhalen. Do you happen to know what changed with this most recent release?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:14:43

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-9cd45f1576

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:15:01

Not sure about any changes, was just kicking tires

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:15:23

Cool. Works for me!

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:15:43

I'll try to test some others too, looks like I just did the Pi4

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:16:59

Awesome, thank you. I will do the same over here.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:17:07

!topic 5) ==== Fedora 41 status ===

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:17:15

!info Fedora-41-20240820.n.0

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:17:22

!link https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=41&build=Fedora-41-20240820.n.0&groupid=5

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:18:14

What do we have for F41? Branch occurred a week ago.

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:19:58

yesterday looks pretty good in openqa

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:20:07

Agreed.

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:20:45

coremoduleany bigger issues being discussed for x86?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:21:00

I missed the blocker review

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:22:09

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282171 came up in blocker review as well

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:22:20

I also missed it. It looks like there's an accepted blocker for gtk4 apps on ARM, specifically mentioned RPi4/00.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:22:36

I'll look into that this week and add feedback in the bug.

<@jforbes:fedora.im>

15:22:55

And of course the expired key bit is back, and I expect it will be waived again

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:23:02

Other than that, the other accepted blockers look to be faily status quo for this early in the cycle.

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:23:26

The BTI/anaconda bug I opened yesterday is probably a freeze exception

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:23:28

Image size issues and latest GRUB

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:23:47

if we can get if fixed soon, since it causes install failures on recent machines.

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:24:13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305877

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:24:17

sounds blockery, which BZ Jeremy Linton?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:24:19

thx

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:25:20

Jeremy Lintonwhat devices would be affected?

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:26:35

grace, libvirt cpu=max, m2+, grav3+

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:26:42

basically anything that is 8.5+

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:28:00

ok, sounds like FE will cover it as we have time too

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:29:46

This is for F41 right?

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:31:00

yes

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:31:54

OK, so it's at least not from enabling PAC/BTI support in libffi, that patch is absent from the package.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:35:03

That's all I have for F41, obviously testing is much appreciated.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:35:13

!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_41_Branched_20240820.n.0_Summary

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:35:20

!topic 6) ==== Open Floor ====

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:36:00

Does anyone have a direct line on benson and can poke him for me to take a look at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282603

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:36:17

I sent Benson an email and haven't heard back, busy/vacation perhaps?

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:39:29

He tends to look at stuff on the weekends, so when I was emailing him not long ago it was usually a couple days turnaround.

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:40:45

It's been almost a month

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:40:53

Maybe I got spam foldered

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:44:11

Probably worth it to send a follow-up or ping him on Matrix here.

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

15:45:16

just FYI, I got one of the snapdragon X laptops and have been poking at it... things are landing pretty fast upstream for them...

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:48:13

Benson has a handle here, but doesn't seem to respond on it, I have a 100+ day old messages to him that were never accepted.

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:48:26

email or BZ's.

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:48:38

I show like 6 handles, not sure which one to use

<@wcrobert:matrix.org>

15:49:12

I bumped the email, we shall see. Give him a couple of weeks in case he's away

<@jlinton:fedora.im>

15:49:24

maybe different servers.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:52:39

I'm gonna close us out here.

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:52:44

Thanks for attending all!

<@coremodule:fedora.im>

15:52:48

!endmeeting