#meeting-2:fedoraproject.org log

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:01:57

!startmeeting Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

15:01:59

Meeting started at 2026-01-21 15:01:57 UTC

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

15:02:00

The Meeting name is 'Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting'

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:02:10

!chair pwhalen kgiusti coremodule saypaul djachimo sarmahaj miabbott mcattamo knecasov

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:02:26

!topic roll call

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:02:50

Ok lets get started with the meeting.

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:03:04

!topic 1) ==== Working Group ====

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:03:24

Any relevant updates from the working group? News or events relevant to share?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:03:56

Klara Necasovahas been fixing up our docs a bit, thanks kindly!

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:04:11

Otherwise, not aware of anything else

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:05:09

Alright then, moving on to the next topic

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:05:23

!topic 2) Fedora 43 - Stable

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:06:07

Regarding today's compose

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:06:12

!info OpenQA testing https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=43&build=Fedora-IoT-43-20260121.0&groupid=1

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:06:36

Just known issue in iot_clevis test failing.

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:06:55

Is this relevant pwhalen ?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:07:36

Its a known console issue on aarch64, we can ignore it

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:08:20

Ok, anything else before moving to Rawhide?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:09:15

Looks good with our internal testing as well. Nothing else from me

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:09:27

Nice

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:09:44

Moving on to Rawhide

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:09:53

!topic 3) Fedora 44 - Rawhide

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:10:20

!info OpenQA testing https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=44&build=Fedora-IoT-44-20260121.0&groupid=1

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:10:57

Ok I see here iot-clevis test failing (I guess we can also ignore it)

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:11:12

And

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:11:31

Also 5 soft failures due to:

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:11:42

Pre-release warning shown when it should not be!

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:11:42

# Soft Failure:

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:12:02

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:12:02

"# Soft Failure:"

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:12:02

Pre-release warning shown when it should not be!

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:12:12

Are those expected? Or harmful?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:12:19

OpenQA looks ok, but our internal testing is still failing. Do we know why?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:12:56

We can also ignore those Pre-release warnings, it is pre-release and those are expected

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:13:31

I feel like those shouldn't be in the first place, since this is pre release software

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:14:08

I believe the internal failures are due to the issue filed in upstream https://github.com/fedora-iot/greenboot-rs/issues/147

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:14:12

something needs to be changed in openqa so we don't hit that

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:14:28

thanks Mario Cattamo

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:14:42

!info https://github.com/fedora-iot/greenboot-rs/issues/147

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:14:43

Maybe if $releasever = rawhide then don't show the warning?

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:16:10

Unless that's not how this works

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:16:33

Seems mainline isnt hitting it. I'll ping to see why we do

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:16:58

Nik Nikovsky I'm not sure

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:17:28

I'm less sure since I'm not even in the iot team

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:17:46

Or have experience in development, just chiming in and learning as I go

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:18:18

Cool! All are welcome! :D

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:19:05

Okey, anything else to discuss about Rawhide?

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:19:30

I know that plasma crashed for me when I started up fedora

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:19:34

Nothing from me

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:19:56

But I've hosed the install plus it was from a KDE Desktop version, so probably something on my end

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:21:38

Nik NikovskySorry to hear about the troubles, definitely worth asking the KDE folks. IoT is primarily used headless so out of scope of this meeting.

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:22:16

I see, but at the same time it might be unsupported since it was from a non atomic spin, so..

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:22:28

Either way, I understand

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:24:31

Alright, nothing else from my side. So we can move on to the next topic

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

15:24:56

niknikovsky gave a cookie to pwhalen. They now have 72 cookies, 1 of which were obtained in the Fedora 43 release cycle

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:25:15

!topic 4) Open Issues & General Bugs

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:25:27

!link https://github.com/fedora-iot/iot-distro/issues

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:26:10

I don't see any new issues

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:26:36

Almost got it down to one page

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:26:45

Nothing new I am aware of

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:27:48

In that case, we can go to the last topic

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:28:07

!topic 5) Open Floor

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:28:35

Any item to discuss in our open floor?

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:28:46

Nothing from me

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:28:59

I think this is like a general space for discussion, right?

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:29:09

Yes it is

<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>

15:29:25

Thanks, I'll remember that.

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:31:14

Alright I have nothing else, so if we don't have more items to discuss I guess we can give back to folks 30 minutes of your time and call the meeting

<@pwhalen:fedora.im>

15:32:15

Thanks Mario Cattamoet al.

<@knecasov:matrix.org>

15:32:50

Thank you!

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:33:11

Thanks all for attending!

<@mcattamo:matrix.org>

15:33:26

!endmeeting