<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:00:10
!startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
20:00:11
Meeting started at 2025-02-10 20:00:10 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
20:00:12
The Meeting name is 'Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting'
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:00:18
!info meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:00:18
!info agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:00:18
!info reminder: speak up if you want to work on a ticket!
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:00:18
!chair nirik phsmoura james
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:00:18
!meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
20:00:18
The Meeting Name is now fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:00:21
morning
<@james:fedora.im>
20:00:54
afternoon
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:01:53
hello
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:02:11
!topic Tickets needing review
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:02:11
!info https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&priority=1
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:02:26
!ticket 12395
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:02:27
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:02:27
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:02:27
● **Last Updated:** 3 days ago
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:02:27
● **Opened:** 3 days ago by walters
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:02:27
**fedora-infrastructure #12395** (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12395):**improved gitlab runners**
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:03:42
low low ops? I think it needs wider discussion probibly.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:04:05
I'm not sure how happy I would be with it in our openshift... but I could be persuaded
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:04:51
or med med I suppose... might be harder to do and might get us some gain...
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:06:04
ok, med med then
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:06:20
!ticket 12397
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:06:21
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:06:21
**fedora-infrastructure #12397** (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12397):**investigate using libdnf5-plugin-actions for f41+/wsgi hosts**
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:06:21
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:06:21
● **Opened:** 21 minutes ago by kevin
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:06:21
● **Last Updated:** Never
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:06:45
I just filed this one. ;) med gain, low trouble? I think it should work, but someone needs to get the right syntax and test it.
<@james:fedora.im>
20:07:38
This feels like it's a problem other people would have ... can you package these plugin action things?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:07:42
This thing caused the outage this morning. ;(
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:07:56
I would think so? it's just a drop in file
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:08:23
so, perhaps httpd package could even ship them? or mod_wsgi?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:09:21
There dont' seem to be any packaged currently
<@james:fedora.im>
20:10:05
yeh, searching and people are mainly doing them in github or whatever and using it for cloudy stuff?
<@james:fedora.im>
20:10:27
Also some confusion between dnf plugins and libdnf plugins
<@james:fedora.im>
20:10:47
Sigh ... I would go med med again
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:10:57
anyhow, I hope we can use it to avoid the problem we have with python updating and breaking apps
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:11:07
fair
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:11:43
!ticket 12398
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:11:44
● **Assignee:** Not Assigned
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:11:44
● **Last Updated:** Never
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:11:44
● **Opened:** 23 minutes ago by kevin
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:11:44
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
20:11:44
**fedora-infrastructure #12398** (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12398):**Fix logrotate on kojipkgs01/02**
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:12:30
I just filed this too. There's a mismatch between the logrotate and the actual logs. ;)
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:12:55
happy to provide more info, etc... med gain, low trouble (hopefully)
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:13:25
+1
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:14:12
!topic Planning, Upcoming work and Open floor
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:14:22
anything for open floor?
<@james:fedora.im>
20:15:31
The main thing I had was how much nirik was actually thinking about reverting the handing thing ... I had a look at the git logs, and there are a bunch of commits now over a non-trivial amount of time.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:15:32
I had a few items. ;)
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:15:51
yeah, that was one thing I was gonna talk about.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:16:06
We have that PR from Zlopez now... it's a ton of changes. ;(
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:16:37
I guess I was gonna say we could try it and see how broken things are after and if it's bad revert, if it's small fix the rest?
<@james:fedora.im>
20:17:12
Yeh, it'll be a bit of work to get a list of revert commits and maybe have to resolve conflicts ... but it's going to get worse after the big commit.
<@james:fedora.im>
20:17:48
Yeh, there's a very human trend of just keep walking down the road we are on ... and it's probably mostly fixed after the latest commit.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:18:05
the sunk cost falacy! :)
<@james:fedora.im>
20:18:32
Yeh, and ansible lint will stop telling us we are bad ;)
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:18:41
but yeah... I'm inclined to give it this last chance... since Zlopez put in a bunch of work on it...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:19:30
is that reasonable? or do you all think it's already too far? 😄
<@james:fedora.im>
20:20:47
My question was more ... if you are mildly annoyed at the extra work it caused, I understand but it will hopefully be better soon ... but if you are annoyed enough you want to undo it, now is probably better than a week from now
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:21:39
yeah... well, I am fine to push on at this point. The playbooks I hit it on I have since fixed...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:21:58
so, I guess I will merge that and then try a main playbook run and see whats still broken. ;)
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:22:32
Next thing: I have some vacation days from last year I need to use... so I will be out wed and friday of this week. ;) and various other days coming up. I'll try and note them as they come up.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:22:50
and I have a lovely dentist appt this afternoon. ;(
<@james:fedora.im>
20:23:11
Souds good, well probably not the dentist
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:23:32
Next tuesday is also the start of f42 beta freeze.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:23:56
so, we should try and make sure we get anything needed in before that if we have big changes to make (or wait until after).
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:24:32
I think thats all I had. ;) For me, I am going to work on some datacenter move planning. Hopefully I can get some docs out so people can help plan...
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:25:33
nirik: is proxy02 stg working? If so I could do the same for proxy01 stg
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:25:59
phsmoura: yep. It is. Just let me know when you want 01 down.
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:26:27
cool, I can start working on it after this meeting then
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
20:27:06
ok, great. I'll go take it down... you can ack/set downtime in nagios
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:28:14
ok, lets go back then
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:28:24
thanks everyone :)
<@james:fedora.im>
20:28:28
phsmoura: thanks
<@phsmoura:fedora.im>
20:28:38
!endmeeting